The inter-rater and test–retest reliability of the Self-care and Transfer scales, and intra-rater reliability of all scales of the Swedish Translation of the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT-S)

References

• Unsworth CA. Evidence-based practice depends on the routine use of outcome measures. Br J Occup Ther 2011;74:209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan EAS. Routine outcome measurement in practice: Overcoming challenges, seeking solutions, demanding impact. Aust Occup Ther J 2011;58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver Fawcett A. Principles of assessment and outcome measurement for occupational therapists and physiotherapists: Theory, skills and application. Chichester: Wiley; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth CA. Measuring the outcome of occupational therapy: Tools and resources. Aust Occup Ther J 2000;47:147–58.
   Google Scholar
• FSA [Swedish association of occupational therapists]. Etisk kod för arbetsterapeuter [Ethical code for occupational therapists]. Stockholm: Förbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen [National Board of Health and Welfare]. Kompetensbeskrivningar för arbetsterapeuter [Desciptions of competence for occupational therapists]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baum CM, Dunn W. Measuring occupational performance: Supporting best practice in occupational therapy. Thorofare: SLACK; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman T, Bennett S, Del Marc C. Evidence-based practice across the health professions. Sydney: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kaae Kristensen H, Persson D, Nygren C, Boll M, Matzen P. Evaluation of evidence within occupational therapy in stroke rehabilitation. Scand J Occup Ther 2011;18:11–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majnemer A. Benefits of using outcome measures in pediatric rehabilitation. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2010;30:165–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, McColl MA. Interventions, effects, and outcomes in occupational therapy: Adults and older adults. Thorofare: SLACK; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AG. Assessment of motor and process skills. 2nd ed. Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Ottenbacher KJ, Cusick A. Goal attainment scaling as a method of clinical service evaluation. Am J Occup Ther 1990;44:519–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks R. Euroqol: The current state of play. Health Policy 1996;37:53–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl MA, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian occupational performance measure. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. Guide for the uniform data set for medical rehabilitation (including the FIM^TM instrument). Version 5.1 Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney F, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Maryland State Med J 1965;14:61–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perry A, Morris M, Unsworth CA, Ducket S, Skeat J, Dodd K, Therapy outcome measures for allied health practitioners in Australia: The AusTOMs. Int J Qual Health C 2004;16:285–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enderby P, John A. Therapy outcome measures for speech and language pathology. San Diego, CA: Singular; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Enderby P, John A, Petheram B. Therapy outcome measures manual: Physiotherapy, occupational therapy, rehabilitation nursing. San Diego, CA: Singular; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Enderby P, John A. Therapy outcome measures in speech and language therapy: Comparing performance between different providers. Int J Lang Comm Dis 1999;43:417–29.
   Google Scholar
• John A, Enderby P. Reliability of speech and language therapists using therapy outcome measures. Int J Lang Comm Dis 2000;9:287–302.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth CA, Duncombe D. AusTOMs for occupational therapy. Melbourne: La Trobe University; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth CA, Duncombe D. AusTOMs for occupational therapy. 2nd ed. Melbourne: La Trobe University; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Perry A, Skeat J. AusTOMs for speech pathology. Melbourne: La Trobe University; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Morris M, Dodd K, Taylor J. AusTOMs for physiotherapy. Melbourne: La Trobe University; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth CA. Measuring outcomes using the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT): Data description and tool sensitivity. Br J Occup Ther 2005;68:354–66.
   Google Scholar
• Wilby HJ. The importance of maintaining a focus on performance components in occupational therapy practice. Br J Occup Ther 2007;70:129–32.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Fayed N, Cieza A, Edmond Bichenbach J. Linking health and health-related information to the ICF: A systematic review from 2001 to 2008. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:1941–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haglund L, Henriksson C. Concepts in occupational therapy in relation to the ICF. Occup Ther Int 2003;10:253–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott F, Unsworth CA, Fricke J, Taylor N. Reliability of the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy Self-care scale. Aust Occup Ther J 2006;53:265–76.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth CA. Using the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT) to measure outcome for clients following stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008;15:351–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth CA, Duncombe D. A comparison of client outcomes from two acute neurological services using self-care data from the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT). Br J Occup Ther 2005;68:477–82.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth CA, Bearup A, Rickard K. A benchmark comparison of outcomes for clients with upper limb dysfunction following stroke using the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT). Am J Occup Ther 2009;63:732–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris M, Perry A, Unsworth CA, Skeat J, Taylor N, Dodd K, Reliability of the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for quantifying disability and health. Int J Ther Rehabil 2005;12:340–6.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth CA, Ducket S, Duncombe D, Perry A, Skeat J, Taylor N. Validity of the AusTOMs scales: A comparison of the AusTOMs and EurQol-5D. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004;2:64–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gwet KL. Handbook on inter-rater reliability. Gaithersburg: Advanced Analytics, LLC; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:617–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousson V, Gasser T, Seifert B. Confidence intervals for intraclass correlation in interrater reliability. Scand J Stat 2003;30:617–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkle DE, Viersma W, Jurs S. Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Keller SD, Gandek B, Brazier JE, Sullivan M. Evaluating translations of health status questionnaires: Methods from the IQOLA project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1995;11:525–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Fricke J, Unsworth CA, Worrell D. Reliability of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) with occupational therapists. Aust Occup Ther J 1993;40:5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth CA, Duncombe D. Australian Therapy Outcome Measures Swedish Version (AusTOMs-S) for Occupational Therapy (Fristedt S, Jonsson L, Londos Y, Timen E, from Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs). 2nd ed. Melbourne, Victoria: La Trobe University; 2007. Available from http://www.fsa. akademikerhuset.se.
   Google Scholar