Older rehabilitees’ life-course agency in Finnish gerontological rehabilitation

References

• Grönlund R. [Living at home – with rehabilitation? Gerontological group rehabilitation work in study.] Sosiaali- ja terveysturvan tutkimuksia 111. Helsinki: Kela; 2010; Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkka K, Karppi SL. Toim. [AGE Project. Realization and effectiveness of net-work-based rehabilitation for frail elderly people.] Sosiaali- ja terveysturvan tutkimuksia112. Helsinki: Kela; 2010. Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Eteläpelto A, Vähäsantanen K, Hökkä P, Paloniemi S. What is agency? Conseptualizing professional agency at work. Educ Res Rev 2013;10:45–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitlin S, Elder GH. Time, self and the curiously abstract concept of agency. Sociol Theory 2007;25:170–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyt Schell BA, Schell JW. Clinical and professional reasoning in occupational therapy. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sumsion T. editor. Client-centred Practice in Occupational Therapy. A guide to implementation. 2nd ed. Toronto: Churchill Livingstone; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Pikkarainen A, Vaara M, Salmelainen U. [The practice, effectiveness and information exchange in gerontological rehabilitation.]. Helsinki: Kelan tutkimusosasto; 2013; Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Cardol M, DeJong BA, Ward CD. On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:970–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saadah MA. On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:977–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Client-centred practice in occupational therapy: Critical reflection. Scan J Occ Ther 2013;20:174–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautala T, Hämäläinen T, Mäkelä L, Rusi-Pyykönen M. [The power of occupation. Occupational therapy in practice.]. Helsinki: Edita; 2011; Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Brown T, Shien CW. Top-down or bottom-up occupational therapy assessment. Which way do we go? Br J Occup Ther 2010;73:95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social welfare and health care reform. A solution for key provisions of the act on the arrangement of social welfare and health care services and the next steps in the process [Internet]. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. 2014. cited 8 October 2014 Available from http://www.stm.fi/en/ministry/strategies/service_structures.
   Google Scholar
• Lindström M. Promoting agency among people with severe psychiatric disability. Umeå: Umeå University Medical Dissertation, New Series 1456; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Tapola-Haaranen M. [The professional social workers as reflexive agents. The study of the theoretical perspective of Margaret Archer.]. Helsingin yliopisto: Sosiaalitieteen laitoksen julkaisuja 4; 2011; Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Vähäsantanen K. Vocational teachers’ professional agency in the stream of change. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research; 2013. 460.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens A. The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Policy Press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 2001;52:1–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer MS. Being Human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Nyman A, Josephsson S, Isaksson G. A narrative of agency enacted within the everyday occupations of an older Swedish woman. J Occup Sci 2014;21:459–72.
   Google Scholar
• Ratner C. Agency and culture. J Ther Soc Behav 2000;30:413–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray S. What constitutes agency and empowerment for women in later life? Soc Rev 2004;52:22–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emirbayer M, Mische A. What is agency? Am J Sociol 1998;103:962–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta G, Tedder M. Agency and learning in life course: Towards an ecological perspective. Stud Edu Adults 2007;39:132–49.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. A Model of human occupation: Theory and Application. 4th ed. Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Phelan S, Kinsella EA. Occupational Identity: Engaging socio-cultural perspectives. J Occup Sci 2009;16:85–91.
   Google Scholar
• Bergström AL, Eriksson G, Asaba E, Erikson A, Tham K. Complex negotiations: The lived experience of enacting agency after a stroke. Scan J Occup Ther 2015;22:43–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald F, Wahl HW. Creating and sustaining homelike places in residential environments. In Rowles GD, Bernard M, editors. Environmental gerontology. Making meaningful places in old age. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2013. p 53–77.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie V, Cutchin MP, Humphry R. Occupation as transactional experience: A critique of individualism in occupational science. J Occup Sci 2006;13:83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall VW. Agency, Structure, and Life Course in the Era of Reflexive Modernization. In The Life Course in the 21st Century. [Internet] Washington DC. 2000. Available from https://www.researchgate.net/home.Home.html.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall VW. Agency, events, and structure at the end of the life course. Adv Life Course Res 2005;10:57–91.
   Google Scholar
• Lood Q, Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Dellenborg L, Mårtensson L. Health-promotion in the context of ageing and migration: A call for person-centred integrated practice. Int J Integr Care 2014; URN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-114771.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brownie S, Nancarrow S. Effects of person-centered care on residents and staff in aged-care facilities: A systematic review. Clin Interv Aging 2013;8:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordin ES. Theory and research on the therapeutic working alliance. New direction. In Horvath AO, Greenberg LS, editors. The working alliance: Theory, research and practice. New York: Wiley; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Harra T. Therapeutic Collaboration. Enabling Client Participation in Occupational Therapy. Acta Universitas Lapponiensis 288 (Doctoral Dissertation, Finnish). Rovaniemi: University of Lapland; 2014; Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Mackrill T. Differentiating life goals and therapeutic goals: Expanding our understanding of working alliance. Br J Guid Couns 2011;39:25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivaraman Nair KP. Life goals: The concept and its relevance to rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:192–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright FA, Boland P, Rytherfor SJ, Kayes NM, McPherson KM. Implementing a client-centred approach in rehabilitation. An autoethnography. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:997–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearon LB, Crowley GM, Chadler J, Robbins MS, Studenski S. Personal functional goals: A new approach to assessing patient-centered outcomes. J Appl Gerontol 2000;19:326–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in practice. 3rd ed. Abingdon: Routledge; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kiresuk TJ, Smith A, Cardillo JE. Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory, and measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Hsien HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1277–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieblich A, Tuval-Mashiasch R, Zilber T. Narrative research: Reading analysis and interpretation. London: Sage; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Farkas MD, Sullivan Soyden A, Gagne C. Introduction to rehabilitation readiness. Boston, MA: Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Järvikoski A, Härkäpää K. [Basis of Rehabilitation. Perspectives for rehabilitation and science of rehabilitation]. 5th ed. Helsinki: WSOYPro; 2011; Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Occupational Therapy Practice. Framework: Domains and Process. 3rd ed. Am J Occup Ther 2014;68:1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Larson EA. The time of our lives: The experience of temporality in occupation. Can J Occup Ther 2004;75:24–35.
   Google Scholar
• McNay L. Agency and experience: Gender as a lived relation. Soc Rev 2004;52:175–90.
   Google Scholar