Determining client cognitive status following mild traumatic brain injury

References

• Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Peloso PM, et al. Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med. 2004 Feb;43 Suppl:28–60.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson EE, Emanuelson I, Olsson M, et al. The new Swedish post-concussion symptoms questionnaire: a measure of symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury and its concurrent validity and inter-rater reliability. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38:26–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohling ML, Binder LM, Demakis GJ, et al. A meta-analysis of neuropsychological outcome after mild traumatic brain injury: re-analysis and reconsiderations of Binder et al. (1997), Frenchman et al. (2005), and Pertab et al. (2009). Clin Neuropsychol. 2011;25:608–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenchman KA, Fox AM, Maybery MT. Neuropsychological studies of mild traumatic brain injury: a meta-analytic review of research since 1995. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005;27:334–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder LM, Rohling ML, Larrabee GJ. A review of mild head trauma. Part I: meta-analytic review of neuropsychological studies. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997;19:421–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englander J, Hall K, Stimpson T, Chaffin S. Mild traumatic brain injury in an insured population: subjective complaints and return to employment. Brain Inj. 1992;6:161–166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holmqvist K, Kamwendo K, Ivarsson AB. Occupational therapists’practice patterns for clients with cognitive impairment following acquired brain injury: development of a questionnaire. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:150–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waehrens EE, Fisher AG. Improving quality of ADL performance after rehabilitation among people with acquired brain injury. Scand J Occup Ther. 2007;14:250–257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2:81–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagoda AS, Bzazarian JJ, Bruns JJ, et al. Clinical policy: neuroimaging and decision making in adult mild traumatic brain injury in the acute setting. J Emerg Nurs. 2009;35:6–40.
   Google Scholar
• Rees PM. Contemporary issues in mild traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1885–1894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake AI, McDonald EC, Magnus NE, et al. Utility of Glasgow Coma Scale-Extended in symptom prediction following mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2006;20:469–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kierman RJ, Mueller J, Langston W, van Dyke C. The neurobehavioral cognitive status examination: a brief but quantitative approach to cognitive assessment. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:481–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns T. Cognitive performance test. Pequannock, NJ: Maddak; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Baum C, Morrison T, Hahn M, Edwards D. Executive Function Performance Test: test protocol booklet. St. Louis, MO: Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AG. Assessment of motor and process skills. User’s manual 6th ed. Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Morarty J. The development of a clinical protocol for the management of mild head injuries. Paper presented at: the 6th World Congress on Brain Injury; 2005 May 6-8; Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson L, Blaga L. Occupational therapy assessments used in acute physical care settings. Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20:127–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas A, Liu L, Warren S, Hopper T. Cognitive assessments for older adults: which ones are used by Canadian therapists and why. Can J Occup Ther. 2007;74:370–381.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown T, Mapleston J, Nairn A, Molloy A. Relationship of cognitive and perceptual abilities to functional independence in adults who have had a stroke. Occup Ther Int. 2013;20:11–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz N, Hartman-Maeir A, Ring H, Soroker N. Relationships of cognitive performance and daily function of clients following right hemisphere stroke: predictive and ecological validity of the LOTCA battery. Occup Ther J Of Res. 2000;20:3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guide for the Uniform Data Set for medical Rehabilitation (including the FIM^TM instrument). Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:703–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blostein PA, Jones SJ, Buechler CM, Vandongen S. Cognitive screening in mild traumatic brain injuries: analysis of the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination when utilized during initial trauma hospitalization. J Neurotrauma. 1997;14:171–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1993;8:86–87.
   Google Scholar
• Luoto TM, Tenovuo O, Kataja A, et al. Who gets recruited in mild traumatic brain injury research?. J Neurotrauma. 2013 Jan 1;30:11–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller J, Kierman R, Langston JW. Cognistat & Cognistat Assessment System Manual. Fairfax, C.A: Cognistat, Inc.; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Tate R. A compendium of tests, scales and questionnaires. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Lannin NA, Scarcia M. Multidisciplinary Screening of Cognitive Impairment Following Acquired Brain Injury. Is there Repetition? J Cogn Rehab. 2004;23:19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Marcotte TD, van Gorp W, Hinkin CH, Osato S. Concurrent validity of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Exam subtests. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997;19:386–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mithrushina M, Abara J, Blumenfeld A. Aspects of validity and reliability of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (NCSE) in assessment of psychiatric patients. J Psychiatr Res. 1994;28:85–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaulay C, Battista M, Lebby P, Mueller J. Geriatric performance on the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (Cognistat). Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003;18:463–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricke J, Unsworth C. Inter-rater reliability of the original and modified Barthel index, and a comparison with the Functional Independence Measure. Aust Occup Ther J. 1997;44:22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Shah S, Muncer S, Griffin J, Elliott L. The utility of the modified barthel index for traumatic brain injury rehabilitation and prognosis. Br. J Occup Ther. 2000;63:469–475.
   Google Scholar
• Adult Trauma Clinical Practice Guidelines Initial Management of Closed Head Injuries in Adults. New South Wales: Ministry of Health; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. NJ: Prentice Hall; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Binder LM. Restrictions on statistics imposed by method of measurement: some reality, much mythology. J Crim Justice. 1984;12:467–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosenthal AC, Livingston DH, Lavery RF, et al. The effect of age on functional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: 6-month report of a prospective multicenter trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2004;56:1042–1048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Doninger NA, Bode RK, Heinemann AW, Ambrose C. Rating scale analysis of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2000 Feb;15:683–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doninger NA, Ehde DM, Bode RK, et al. Measurement properties of the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination (Cognistat) in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 2006;51:281–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullagh S, Oucherlony D, Protzner A, et al. Prediction of neuropsychiatric outcome following mild trauma brain injury: an examination of the Glasgow Coma Scale. Brain Inj. 2001;15:489–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Naalt J, van Zomeren AH, Sluiter WJ, Minderhoud JM. One year outcome in mild to moderate head injury: the predictive value of acute injury characteristics related to complaints and return to work. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66:207–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar