Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the FIM + FAM in patients with cerebrovascular accident

References

• Law MC. Client-centered occupational therapy. New Jersey: Slack Incorporated; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Model of human occupation: Theory and application. 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons DC, Crepeau EB, White BP. The predictive power of narrative data in occupational therapy evaluation. Am J Occup Ther 2000;54:471–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mita S, Fujiwara T, Sonoda S, Kondo S, Yamamoto M, Kimura A. Experience of using Functional Assessment Measure (FAM): usability as ADL and IADL assessment (in Japanese). Sogo Rehabilitation 2001;29:361–4.
   Google Scholar
• Hall KM, Hamilton BB, Gordon WA, Zasler ND. Characteristics and comparisons of functional assessment indices: disability rating scale, functional independence measure, and functional assessment measure. J Head Traum Rehabil 1993;8:60–74.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley CA, Taylor R, Hellawell DJ, Pentland B. Use of the functional assessment measure (FIM + FAM) in head injury rehabilitation: a psychometric analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;67:749–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson KM, Pentland B. Disability in patients following traumatic brain injury-which measure? Int J Rehabil Res. 1997;20:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobart JC, Lamping DL, Freeman JA, Langdon DW, McLellan DL, Greenwood RJ, et al. Evidence-based measurement: which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation? Neurology 2001;57:639–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Siegert RJ. A comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the UK FIM + FAM. . Disabil Rehabil 2013;35:1885–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson KM, Pentland B, Cudmore SF, Prescott RJ. An inter-rater reliability study of the Functional Assessment Measure (FIM + FAM). Disabil Rehabil 1996;18:341–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaghy S, Wass PJ. Interrater reliability of the Functional Assessment Measure in a brain injury rehabilitation program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:1231–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcott D, Dixon K, Swann R. The reliability of the items of the Functional Assessment Measure (FAM): differences in abstractness between FAM items. Disabil Rehabil 1997;19:355–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L. Standardized outcome assessment in brain injury rehabilitation for younger adults. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:383–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seel RT, Wright G, Wallace T, Newman S, Dennis L. The utility of the FIM + FAM for assessing traumatic brain injury day program outcomes. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007;22:267–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson FC, Wheatley-Smith L, Downes C. Analysis of intensive outpatient neuro-rehabilitation outcomes using FIM + FAM(UK). NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;24: 377–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara T, Sonoda S, Mita S, Okajima Y, Kimura A, Chino N. ADL in Traumatic Brain Injuries with Functional Assessment Measure (FAM) (in Japanese). Jpn J Rehabil Med 2001;38:253–8.
   Google Scholar
• Yamanaka M, Sonoda S, Suzuki R, Okamoto S, Sakai K, Okazaki H, et al. Reliability of Functional Assessment Measure for the patients with cognitive impairment (in Japanese). Jpn J Rehabil Med 2006;43:383
   Google Scholar
• Tsuji T, Sonoda SS, Chino N. The ADL Structure for Stroke Patients at admission and discharge Based on the Functional Independence Measure. T Jpn J Rehabil Med 1996;33:301–9.
   Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Nyein K, Turner-Stokes T, Gatehouse C. The UK FIM + FAM: development and evaluation. Functional Assessment Measure. Clin Rehabil 1999;13: 277–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law J, Fielding B, Jackson D, Turner-Stokes L. The UK FIM + FAM Extended Activities of Daily Living module: evaluation of scoring accuracy and reliability. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:825–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The UK FIM + FAM (Functional Assessment Measure) [Internet]: UK FIM + FAM users Group: 2010 Oct 10-[cited 2015 July 12]; Available from: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/lsm/research/divisions/cicelysaunders/attachments/Tools-FIMFAM-FAM-items-only.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lyden P, Lu M, Jackson C, et al. Underlying structure of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: results of a factor analysis. NINDS tPA Stroke Trial Investigators. Stroke 1999;30:2347–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988;19:604–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunnstrom S. Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia: based on sequential recovery stages. Phys Ther 1966;46: 357–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B. The FAB: a Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside. Neurology 2000;55:1621–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azouvi P, Olivier S, de Montety G, Samuel C, Louis-Dreyfus A, Tesio L. Behavioral assessment of unilateral neglect: study of the psychometric properties of the Catherine Bergego Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:51–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colton T. Statistics in Medicine. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences. 2nd edition. Academic Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Making measures reliable. In: Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. 3rd edition. Psychometric Theory. 1994:262-5.
   Google Scholar
• Charter RA. A breakdown of reliability coefficients by test type and reliability method, and the clinical implications of low reliability. J Gen Psychol 2003;130:290–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar