Interaction in online interprofessional education case discussions

References

• Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, H. (2005). The Theory-Practice Relationship in Interprofessional Education. London: Centre for the advancement of interprofessional education, CAIPE.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J., & Hewstone, M. (1996). Shared learning for doctors and social workers: Evaluation of a program. British Journal of Social Work, 26(1), 239–257.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll-Barefield, A., & Murdoch, C. (2004). Using online learning to enhance interdisciplinary education. Journal of Allied Health, 33(1), 78–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chandler-Crichlow, C. (1995). A comparison of facilitators’ use of summarizing vs. synthesizing intervention techniques on cognitive performance in computer mediated conferences. Unpublished Doctoral, University of Toronto, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Colyer, H., Helme, M., & Jones, I. (Eds.). (2005). The theory-practice relationship in interprofessional education. Occasional Paper no. 7. London: Higher Education Academy, Health Sciences & Practice.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, C. (2003). Virtual learning and inter-professional education: Developing computer-mediated communication for learning about collaboration. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(4), 341–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennen, V. (2005). From message posting to learning dialogues: Factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion. Distance Education, 26(1), 127–148.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(2–3), 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, S. (2001). A constructivist approach to online training for online teachers. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1), 35–57.
   Google Scholar
• Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the ‘contact hypothesis’. In M.Hewstone & R.Brown (Eds.), Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters (pp. 1–44). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hiltz, S. R. (2005). Creating and sustaining effective alns. JALN: Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, J., Watt-Watson, J., McGillion, M., Raman-Wilms, L., Cockburn, L., Lax, L., et al. (2008). An interfaculty pain curriculum: Lessons learned from six years' experience. Pain, 140(1), 74–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1992). Positive interdependence: Key to effective cooperation. In R.Hertz-Lazarowitz & N.NMiller (Eds.), Interaction in Cooperative Groups: The Theoretical Anatomy of Group Learning (pp. 174–202). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2004). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D.Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (2nd edn., pp785–809). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Juntunen, A., & Heikkinen, E. (2004). Lessons from interprofessional e-learning: Piloting a care of the elderly module. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 18(3), 269–278.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, S., Kolko, B., & Greer, T. (2002). Web-based problem solving learning: Third-year medical students' participation in end-of-life care virtual clinic. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(6), 761–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindqvist, S., Duncan, A., Shepstone, L., Watts, F., & Pearce, S. (2005). Case-based learning in cross-professional groups – The development of a pre-registration interprofessional learning programme. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(5), 509–520.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Masters, K., & Oberprieler, G. (2004). Encouraging equitable online participation through curriculum articulation. Computers and Education, 42, 319–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, C. (2002). Computer supported teamwork: An integrative approach to evaluating cooperative learning in an online environment. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18(2), 227–254.
   Google Scholar
• Miers, M., Clarke, B., Pollard, K., Rickaby, C., Thomas, J., & Turtle, A. (2007). Online interprofessional learning: The student experience. Journal of interprofessional care, 21(5), 529–542.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picciano, A. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1), 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Quinney, A., Hutchings, M., & Scammell, J. (2008). Student and staff experiences of using a virtual community, wessex bay, to support interprofessional learning: Messages for collaborative practice. Social Work Education, 27(6), 658–664.
   Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2). Retrieved March 10, 2011, from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/153
   Google Scholar
• Santy, J. , Beadle, M., & Needham, Y. (2009). Using an online case conference to facilitate interprofessional learning. Nurse Education in Practice, 5, 383–387.
   Google Scholar
• Sleightholm Cairns, B. (1994). The facilitation process in computer conferencing courses: The perspectives of teachers. Unpublished Doctoral, University of Toronto, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2004). Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning. Computers and Education, 42(4), 403–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication & Information, 5(1), 23–49.
   Google Scholar
• Waterston, R. (2006). Interaction in online interprofessional education case discussions. Unpublished Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume 68-01, 0074, University of Toronto, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N., & Palinscar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C.Berliner & R. C.Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 841–873). New York, London: Prentice Hall International.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, K., & Peck, K. L. (2003). The effects of peer-controlled or moderated online collaboration on group problem solving and related attitudes. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 29(3). Retrieved March 10, 2011, from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/viewArticle/91/85
   Google Scholar