Peeling the layers: a grounded theory of interprofessional co-learning with residents of a homeless shelter

References

• Barnes, D., Carpenter, J., & Dickinson, C. (2006). The outcomes of partnerships with mental health service users in interprofessional education: A case study. Health and Social Care in the Community, 14(5), 426–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, H. (2007). Interprofessional education: The fourth focus. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 21(1), 40–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barr, H., Koppel, I., Reeves, S., Hammick, M., & Freeth, D. (2005). Effective interprofessional education: Argument, assumption & evidence. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2007). User involvement, research and health inequalities: Developing new directions. Health and Social Care in the Community, 15(4), 306–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., & Branfield, F. (2006). Developing inclusive partnerships: User-defined outcomes, networking and knowledge – A case study. Health and Social Care in the Community, 14(5), 436–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, S. (1993). User participation and interprofessional collaboration in community care. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 7(2), 151–159.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, S. (1997). User voice, interprofessionalism and postmodernity. Jounal of Interprofessional Care, 11(2), 195–203.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. (2006). Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. (2005). The power of critical theory: Liberating adult learning and teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research. (Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Couturier, Y., Gagnon, D., Carrier, S., & Etheridge, F. (2008). The interdisciplinary condition of work in relational professions of the health and social care field: A theoretical standpoint. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22(4), 341–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, R.M., & Cunningham, P. (2000). Co-learning in the community. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 87(Fall), 73–82.
   Google Scholar
• D'Amour, D., & Oandasan, I. (2005). Interprofessionality as the field of interprofessional practice and interprofessional education: An emerging concept. Journal of Interprofessional Education, 19(Suppl.), 8–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farrell, C., Towle, A., & Godolphin, W. (2006). Where’s the Patient’s voice in Health Professional Education?? Vancouver, BC Division of Health Care Communication. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. (Vol. 20). New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Garth, R., Felicetti, D., & Sigmon, R. (2004). Engaging communities and campuses: Building college and university capacity to engage with communities. Washington, DC: The Council of Independent Colleges.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, W., & Callery, P. (2001). Enhancing the rigor of grounded theory: Incorporating reflexivity and relationality. Qualitative Health Research, 11(2), 257–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labaree, R. (2002). The risk of “going observationalist”: Negotiating the hidden dilemmas of being an insider participant observer. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 97–122.
   Google Scholar
• Lenney, M. (2006). Inclusion, projections of difference and reflective practice. An interactionist perspective. Reflective Practice, 7(2), 181–192.
   Google Scholar
• McKeown, M., Malihi-Shoja, L., & Downe, S. (2010). Service User and Carer Involvement in Education for Health and Social Care. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, L., & Savage, J. (2002). Participant observation, informed consent and ethical approval. Nurse Researcher, 9(4), 58–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Introduction: Inquiry and participation in search of a world worthy of human aspiration. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 1–14). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Regan De Bere, S. (2003). Evaluating the implications of complex interprofessional education for improvements in collaborative practice: A multidimensional model. British Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 105–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer Kirkham, S., Van Hofwegen, L., & Hoe, H.C. (2005). Narratives of social justice: Learning in innovative clinical settings. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 2(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Repper, J., & Breeze, J. (2004). A review of the literature on user and carer involvement in the training and education of health professionals. Sheffield, UK: The Sheffield Health and Social Care Research Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Roberto, A., Meyer, G., Preston, S., & Dearing, J. (1994). Orientation to co-learning among University Extension Personnel. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Rolls, L., Davis, E., & Coupland, K. (2002). Improving serious mental illness through interprofessional education. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 9, 317–324.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roschelle, A., Turpin, J., & Elias, R. (2000). Who learns from service learning?? American Behavioral Scientist, 43(5), 839–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheyett, A., & Diehl, M. (2004). Walking our talk in social work education: Partnering with consumers of mental health services. Social Work Education, 23(4), 435–450.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, R.S. (2001). The “how to” of grounded theory: Avoiding the pitfalls. In R.S. Schreiber & P.N. Stern (Eds.), Using grounded theory in nursing (pp. 55–83). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stacy, R., & Spencer, J. (1999). Patients as teachers: A qualitative study of patient’s views on their role in a community-based undergraduate project. Medical Education, 33, 688–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistlethwaite, J., & Cockayne, E. (2004). Early student-patient interactions: The views of patients regarding their experiences. Medical Teacher, 26(5), 420–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, P., Sheldon, F., Coles, C., Mountford, B., Hillier, R., Radway, P. et al. (2000) Listening to and learning from the family carer’s story: An innovative approach in interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 14(4), 387–395.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C., Rutherford, G., & Kuzmak, N. (2009) Characteristics of home: Perspectives of women who are homeless. The Qualitative Report, 14(2), 299–317.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C., Rutherford, G., & Sears, A. (2010) Fostering inclusivity through teaching and learning action research. Action Research, 8(2), 191–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar