A critical realist model of complexity for interprofessional working

References

• Atkinson M., Jones M., Lamont E.. 2007. Multi-agency working and its implications for practice: A review of the literature. Reading: CfBT.
   Google Scholar
• . 2010. Children's services at the crossroads: A critical evaluation of contemporary policy for practiceAyre P., Preston-Shoot M.. Lyme Regis: Russell House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar R.. 2008. A realist theory of science. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar R.. 2009. Scientific realism and human emancipation. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar R.. 1989. The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Hassocks: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K., & White, K. (2006). Exploring the evidence base for integrated children's services. Retrieved from: www.openscotland.gov.uk/publications.
   Google Scholar
• Collier A.. 1994. Critical realism: An introduction to Roy Bhaskar's philosophy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Conway P.. Falling between minds: The effects of unbearable experiences on multi-agency communication in the care system. Adoption and Fostering. 2009; 33:18–29.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper H., Braye S., Geyer R.. Complexity and interprofessional education. Learning in Health & Social Care. 2004; 3 4: 179–189.
   Google Scholar
• Danermark B., Ekstrom M., Jacobsen L., Karlsson J.C.. 2002. Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Devaney J., Spratt T.. Child abuse as a complex and wicked problem: Reflecting on policy developments in the United Kingdom in working with children and families with multiple problems. Children and Youth Services Review. 2009; 31 6: 635–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Children Schools and Families. 2008. Building brighter futures: Next steps for the children's workforce. Nottingham: DCSF.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Children Schools and Families. 2010. Children's trusts: Statutory guidance on cooperation arrangements, including the children's trust board and the children and young people's plan. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills. 2006. Working together to safeguard children: A guide to inter-agency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of children. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström Y.. Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education & Work. 2001; 14 1: 133–156.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson H.. 2010. The understanding systemic caseworker: The (changing) nature and meanings of working with children and families. In: P. Ayre, M. Preston-Shoot. editors. Children's services at the crossroads: A critical evaluation of contemporary policy for practice. Lyme Regis: Russell House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett B., Featherstone B., Goddard J.. 2004. Contemporary child care policy and practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fish S., Munro E., Bairstow S.. 2008. Working together to safeguard children: Developing a multi-agency systems approach for case reviews. London: SCIE.
   Google Scholar
• Hallett C., Birchall E.. 1995. Interagency coordination in child protection. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey D.L., Reed M.. 1996. Social science as the study of complex systems. In: D.L. Kiel, E. Elliot. editors. Chaos theory in the social sciences: Foundations and applications. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgs J., Jones M.A.. 2008. Clinical decision-making and multiple problem spaces. In: J. Higgs, M.A. Jones, S. Loftus, N. Christensen. editors. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. Oxford: Butterworth-Heineman.
   Google Scholar
• Irvine R., Kerridge I., McPhee J., Freeman S.. Interprofessionalism and ethics: Consensus or clash of cultures?. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2002; 16 3: 199–210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lash S.. 2000. Risk Culture. In: B. Adam, U. Beck, J. Van Loon. editors. The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leathard A.. 2003. Models for interprofessional collaboration. In: A. Leathard. editors. Interprofessional collaboration: From policy to practice in health and social care. Hove: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Menzies-Lyth I.. 1988. Containing anxiety in institutions. London: Free Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nybell L.. Meltdowns and containments. Constructions of children at risk as complex systems. Childhood. 2001; 8 2: 213–230.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien M., Bachmann M.O., Jones N.R., Reading R., Thoburn J., Husbands C., Shreeve A., Watson J.. Do Integrated Children's Services Improve Children's Outcomes?: Evidence From England's Children's Trust Pathfinders. Children & Society. 2009; 23 5: 320–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovretveit J.. 1993. Coordinating community care: Multidisciplinary teams and care management. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parton N.. Every child matters: The shift to prevention whilst strengthening protection in children's services in England. Children and Youth Services Review. 2006; 28 8: 976–992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen J.. Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem. Safety Science. 1997; 27 2: 183–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reder P., Duncan S.. Understanding communication in child protection networks. Child Abuse Review. 2003; 12 2: 82–100.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves S., Goldman J., Gilbert J., Tepper J., Silver I., Suter E., Zwarenstein M.. A scoping review to improve conceptual clarity of interprofessional interventions. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2011; 25 3: 167–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett D.L., Rosenberg W.M.C., Gray J.A.M., Haynes R.B., Richardson W.S.. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996; 312 7023: 71–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson I.. Complexity, ‘practical rationality’ and evidence-based policy making. Policy and Politics. 2006; 34 1: 115–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer A.. 2000. Realism and social science. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer A.. 2010. Method in social science: A Realist Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sloper P.. Facilitators and barriers for co-ordinated multi-agency services. Child: Care, Health and Development. 2004; 30 6: 571–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spratt T.. Identifying families with multiple problems: Possible responses from child and family social work to current policy developments. British Journal of Social Work. 2009; 39:435–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens I., Cox P.. Complexity theory: Developing new understandings of child protection in field settings and in residential child care. British Journal of Social Work. 2008; 38 7: 1320–1336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart A., Petch A., Curtice L.. Moving towards integrated working in health and social care in Scotland: From maze to matrix. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2003; 17 4: 335–350.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thelen E., Smith L.B.. 1994. A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift N.. The Place of Complexity. Theory, Culture & Society. 1999; 16 3: 31–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warmington P., Daniels H., Edwards A., Brown S., Leadbetter J., Martin D., Middleton D.. 2004. Interagency collaboration: A review of the literature. Bath: University of Bath.
   Google Scholar
• Webb A.. Coordination: A problem in public sector management. Policy & Politics. 1991; 19:229–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodhouse D., Pengelly P.. 1991. Anxiety and the dynamics of collaboration. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White S., Hall C., Peckover S.. The descriptive tyranny of the common assessment framework: Technologies of categorization and professional practice in child welfare. Br J Soc Work. 2009; 39 7: 1197–1217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar