Partnership working in services for children: Use of the common assessment framework

References

• Allen G.. 2011. Early intervention: The next steps. An Independent Report to Her Majesty's Government, London.
   Google Scholar
• Avis J.. Further education: Policy hysteria, competitiveness and performativity. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 2009; 30 5: 653–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson G.. 2000. Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution and epistemology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter S.K., Brumfitt S.M.. Professional differences in interprofessional working. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2008; 22 3: 239–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon M., Howe A., Dagley V., Salter C., Warren C., Black J.. 2006. Evaluating the common assessment framework and lead professional guidance and implementation in 2005–6. London: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, F. (2011). Interprofessional working: Cultures, identities and conceptualisations of practice. PhD thesis. Chichester University, UK..
   Google Scholar
• Cottrell D., Bollom P.. Translating research into practice: The challenges of establishing a new multi-agency team for vulnerable children. Journal of Children's Services. 2007; 2 3: 52–63.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels H., Leadbetter J., Edwards A., Martin D., Middleton D., Popova A., Warmington P., . Learning in and for multi-agency working. Oxford Review of Education. 2007; 33 4: 521–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Children, Schools and Families. 2007. The children's plan: Building brighter futures. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Children, Schools and Families. 2008. Building brighter futures: Next steps for the children's workforce. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills. 2004. The children act. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA). 2009. Protecting children is everyone's business. National framework for protecting Australia's children 2009–2020. Greenway, Canberra: Australian Government. ACT 2600.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. 1989. The children's act. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson H., Glasby J.. Not throwing out the partnership agenda with the personalisation bathwater. Journal of Integrated Care. 2008; 16 4: 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström Y.. Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work. 2001; 14 1: 133–156.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman M., Miller C., Ross N.. The impact of individual philosophies on multi-professional practice and the implications for education. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2000; 14 3: 237–247.
   Google Scholar
• Hall P.. Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2005; 1 Suppl.: 188–196.
   Google Scholar
• Horwath J., Morrison T.. Collaboration, integration and change in children's services: Critical issues and key ingredients. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2007; 31 1: 55–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham C., Vangen S.. 2005. Managing to collaborate. The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kvarnström S.. Difficulties in collaboration: A critical incident study of interprofessional healthcare teamwork. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2008; 22 2: 191–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laming L.. 2009. The protection of children in England: A progress report. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Leadbetter J.. Learning in and for interagency working: Making links between practice development and structured reflection. Learning in Health and Social Care. 2008; 7 4: 198–208.
   Google Scholar
• Lonnie B., Parton N., Thompson J., Harries J.. 2008. Reforming child protection. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Munro E.. 2011. The Munro review of child protection: Final report, a child centred system. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver B.. Reforming the children and young people's workforce: A higher education response. Learning in Health and Social Care. 2008; 7 4: 209–218.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew T.F.. Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology. 1998; 49:65–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prenkert F.. A theory of organizing informed by activity theory. Journal of Organizational Change. 2006; 19 4: 471–490.
   Google Scholar
• Puonti A.. Tools for collaboration: Using and designing tools in interorganizational economic-crime investigation. Mind, Culture and Activity. 2004; 11 2: 133–152.
   Google Scholar
• Reder P., Duncan S.. Making the most of the Victoria Climbie inquiry report. Child Abuse Review. 2004; 13:95–114.
   Google Scholar
• Smith J.A.. Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology and Health. 1996; 11:261–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith J.A.. Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2004; 1:39–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith J.A., Flowers P., Larkin M.. 2009. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Victor B., Boynton A.. 1998. Invented here: Maximizing your organization's internal growth and profitability. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar