Use of a qualitative methodological scaffolding process to design robust interprofessional studies

References

• Alavi M, Irajpour A, Abdoli S, SaberiZafarghandi M. Clients as mediators of interprofessional collaboration in mental health services in Iran. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2012; 26:36–42 doi: 10.3109/13561820.2011.623803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggs J, Schmitt M. Nurses' and resident physicians' perceptions of the process of collaboration in an MICU. Research in Nursing & Health. 1997; 20 1: 71–80 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199702).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bainbridge L. 2008. The power of prepositions: Learning with, from, and about others in interprofessional health education. Cincinnati, OH: Union Institute & University of Cincinnati (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
   Google Scholar
• Baxter S, Brumfitt S. Professional differences in interprofessional working. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2008; 22 3: 239–251 doi:10.1080/13561820802054655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . 2000. The process of group psychotherapy: Systems for analyzing changeBeck AP, Lewis CM. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Benne KD, Sheats P. Functional roles of group members. Journal of Social Issues. 1948; 4 2: 41–49 doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1948.tb01783.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer H. 1969. Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke H, Mass H. Comox valley nursing centre: From collaboration to empowerment. Public Health Nursing. 1998; 15 3: 216–224 doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.1998.tb00342.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. 2003. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. 2007. Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty M. 1998. The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Davis DR, Burlingame GM, Layne CM. 2006. Integrating small group process principles into trauma focused group psychotherapy. In: LA Schein, HI Spitz, GM Burlingame, PR Muskin. editors. Psychological effects of catastrophic disaster. New York: Haworth Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman DC. The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review. 1984; 9 1: 47–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetterman D. 2009. Ethnography: Step-by-step. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gough B. 2003. Deconstructing reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. In: L Finlay, B Gough. editors. . Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hammick M. Interprofessional education: Evidence from the past to guide the future. Medical Teacher. 2000; 22 5: 461–467 doi:10.1080/01421590050110713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvan R, Royeen C, Jensen G. 2009. Grounding interprofessional education and practice in theory. In: C Royeen, G Jensen, R Harvan. editors. Leadership in interprofessional health education and practice. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett45–63.
   Google Scholar
• Helitzer-Allen D, Makhambera M, Wangel A. Obtaining sensitive information: The need for more than focus groups. Reproductive Health Matters. 1994; 2 3: 75–82.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber. 2007. Teaching grounded theory. In: A Bryant, K Charmaz. editors. Handbook of grounded theory. Thorofare: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt JP, Shulman D. 2009. Self & society: A symbolic interactionist social psychology. USA: Pearson Higher Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Leask J, Hawe P, Chapman S. Focus group composition: A comparison between natural and constructed groups. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2001; 25:152–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leipzig R, Hyer K, Ek K, Wallenstein S, Vezina M, Fairchild S, Howe J. Attitudes toward working on interdisciplinary healthcare teams: A comparison by discipline. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2002; 50 6: 1141–1148 doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50274.x….
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemieux-Charles L, McGuire W. What do we know about health care team effectiveness? A review of the literature. Medical Care Research & Review. 2006; 63 3: 263–300 doi: 10.1177/1077558706287003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin K. 1943. Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamicsGertrude W Lewin. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Martin G, Finn R. Patients as team members: Opportunities, challenges and paradoxes of including patients in multi-professional healthcare teams. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2011; 33 7: 1050–1065 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01356.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald J, Jayasuriya R, Harris M. The influence of power dynamics and trust on multidisciplinary collaboration: A qualitative case study of type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMC Health Services Research. 2012; 12 63: 1–10 doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan DL. 1997. Focus groups as qualitative research: Qualitative research methods series. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ødegard A. Exploring perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in child mental health care. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2006; 6:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Patton M. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Piquette D, Reeves S, LeBlanc V. Interprofessional intensive care unit team interactions and medical crisis: A qualitative study. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2009; 23 3: 273–285 doi:10.1080/13561820802697818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prus R. 1994. Approaching the study of human group life: Symbolic interaction and ethnographic inquiry. In: ML Dietz, R Prus, W Shaffir. editors. Doing everyday life: Ethnography as human lived experience. Canada: Copp Clark Longman Ltd10–29.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves S, Albert M, Kuper A, Hodges D. Qualitative research: Why use theories in qualitative research?. British Medical Journal. 2008; 10:631–634 doi: 10:1136/bmj.a949.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves S, Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Barr H, Freeth D, Hammick M, Koppel I. Interprofessional education: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Review). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008. 2009a1 Art. No.: CD002213. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002213.pub2.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves S, Rice K, Conn L, Miller K-L, Kenaszchuk C, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional interaction, negotiation and non-negotiation on general internal medicine wards: An ethnographic study. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2009b; 23:633–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose L. Interprofessional collaboration in the ICU: How to define?. Nursing in Critical Care. 2011; 16 1: 5–10 doi:10.1111/j.1478-5153.2010.00398.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutan S, Stone W. 2001. Psychodynamic group psychotherapy. New York: The Gilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Finding the findings in qualitative studies. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2002; 34:213–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Martin-Rodriguez L, Beaulieu M, D'Amour D, Ferrada-Videla M. The determinants of successful collaboration: A review of theoretical and empirical studies. Journal Interprofessional Care. 2005Suppl. 1: 132–147 doi: 10.1080/13561820500082677.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwandt TA. 2007. The SAGE dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sexton J, Makary M, Tersigni A, Pryor D, Hendrich A, Thomas E, Pronovost P. Teamwork in the operating room: Frontline perspectives among hospitals and operating room personnel. Anesthesiology. 2006; 105 5: 877–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw A, DeLusignan S, Rowlands G. Do primary care professionals work as a team: A qualitative study. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2005; 19 4: 396–405 doi:10.1080/13561820500053454.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shenton AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information. 2004; 22:63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN, Rook DW. 2007. Focus groups: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckman BW, Jensen MA. Stages of small-group development revisited. Group & Organizational Studies. 1977; 2 4: 419–427.
   Google Scholar
• Warr DJ. “It was fun…but we don't usually talk about these things”: Analyzing sociable interactions in focus groups. Qualitative Inquiry. 2005; 11:200–225 doi: 10.1177/1077800404273412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg D, Cooney-Miner D, Perloff J, Babington L, Avgar A. Building collaborative capacity: Promoting interdisciplinary teamwork in the absence of formal teams. Medical Care. 2011; 49 8: 716–723 doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318215da3f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalom ID, Leszcz M. 2005. The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zwarenstein M, Reeves S. Knowledge translation and interprofessional collaboration: Where the rubber of evidence-based care hits the road of teamwork. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2006; 26 1: 46–54 doi: 10.1002/chp.50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Reeves S. Interprofessional collaboration: Effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (Review). Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. 20093: CD000072.
   Google Scholar