Evaluating learning environments for interprofessional care

References

• American College of Surgeons. (2011, June 29). Kirkpatrick hierarchy for assessment of research papers
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, S.K., & Brumfitt, S.M. (2008). Professional differences in interprofessional working. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22, 239–251. doi: 10.1080/13561820802054655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, F., & Sims, W. (2001). Offices that work: Balancing communication, flexibility and cost. International Workplace Studies Program (pp. 77). Cornell: Cornell University
   Google Scholar
• Bines, J., & Jamieson, P. (2013). Designing new collaborative learning spaces in clinical environments: Experiences from a children's hospital in Australia. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(S2), 63–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blomkvist, V., Eriksen, C.A., Theorell, T., Ulrich, R.S., & Rasmanis, G. (2005). Acoustics and psychosocial environment in intensive coronary care. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62, 132–139
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process (2nd ed.). Boston: D.C. Heath and Company
   Google Scholar
• Earthman, G.I. (2004). Prioritization of 31 criteria for school building adequacy. Baltimore: American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Maryland
   Google Scholar
• Glanville, R. (2004). Impact of the built environment. Practice Development in Health Care, 3, 182–185
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (2005). Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19, 188–196
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammick, M., Freeth, D., Koppel, I., Reeves, S., & Barr, H. (2007). A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9. Medical Teacher, 29, 735–751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, C.N. (2011a). Designing for autism: Lighting. Arch daily. Retrieved from www.archdaily.com website: http://www.archdaily.com/177293/designing-for-autism-lighting/
   Google Scholar
• Henry, C.N. (2011b). Designing for autism: More able not less disabled. Arch daily. Retrieved from www.archdaily.com website: http://www.archdaily.com/190322/designing-for-autism-more-able-not-less-disabled/
   Google Scholar
• Henry, C.N. (2011c). Designing for autism: Spatial considerations. Arch daily. Retrieved from www.archdaily.com website: http://www.archdaily.com/179359/designing-for-autism-spatial-considerations/
   Google Scholar
• Henry, C.N. (2011d). Designing for autism: The “neuro-typical” approach. Arch daily. Retrieved from www.archdaily.com website: http://www.archdaily.com/181402/designing-for-autism-the-neuro-typical-approach/
   Google Scholar
• Henry, C.N. (2012). Designing for autism: Architects moving in the right direction. Arch daily. Retrieved from www.archdaily.com website: http://www.archdaily.com/197788/architecture-for-autism-architects-moving-in-the-right-direction/
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, S., Hall, E., Wall, K., Woolner, P., & McCaughey, C. (2005). The impact of school environments: A literature review. London: CfBT/Design Council
   Google Scholar
• Izzo, M.V., Rissing, S.W., Anderson, C., Nasar, J.L., & Lissner, L.S. (2001). Universal design for learning in the college classroom. In W.F.E. Preiser & K.H. Smith (Eds.), Universal design handbook (2nd ed., pp. 31–39). New York: McGraw Hill
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L. (2006). The role of the physical environment in delivering better health care. Practice Development in Health Care, 3, 234–237
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, A., & Hamilton, D. K. (2008). The Pebble Projects: Coordinated evidence-based case studies. Building Research & Information, 36, 129–145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, D. (1996). Revisiting Kirkpatrick's four-level model. Training and Development, 50, 54–59
   Google Scholar
• Küller, R., & Lindsten, C. (1992). Health and behavior of children in classrooms with and without windows. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 305–317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, N., & Tan, S. (2011). A comprehensive learning space evaluation model. Strawberry Hills NSW: Australian Learning and Teaching Council Ltd
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, P. (2007). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. London: Pearson Education
   Google Scholar
• Mostafa, M. (2008). An architecture for autism: Concepts of design intervention for the autistic user. International Journal of Architectural Research, 2, 189–204
   Google Scholar
• Pauzé, E., & Reeves, S. (2010). Examining the effects of interprofessional education on mental health providers: Findings from an updated systematic review. Journal of Mental Health, 19, 258–271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preiser, W.F.E. (2002). The evolution of post-occupancy evaluation: Toward building performance and universal design evaluation Learning from Our Buildings: A State-of-the-Practice Summary of Post-Occupancy Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press
   Google Scholar
• Preiser, W.F.E., & Nasar, J.L. (2008). Assessing building performance: Its evolution from post-occupancy evaluation. International Journal of Architectural Research, 2, 84–99
   Google Scholar
• Preiser, W.F., Rabinowitz, H.Z., & White, E.T. (1988). Post-occupancy evaluation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold
   Google Scholar
• Preiser, W.F.E., & Vischer, J. (2005). The evolution of building performance evaluation: An introduction. In W.F.E. Preiser & J. Vischer (Eds.), Assessing building performance. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, D., Wilson, H., Powell, D., & Tibbetts, B. (2008). Designing next generation places of learning: Collaboration at the pedagogy-space-technology nexus. The University of Queensland
   Google Scholar
• Ringsted, C., Hodges, B., & Scherpbier, A. (2011). “The research compass”: An introduction to research in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 56. Medical Teacher, 33, 695–709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanoff, H. (2001). School building assessment methods. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities-NCEF
   Google Scholar
• Sommer, R., & Olsen, H. (1988). The soft classroom. Environment and Behavior, 12, 3–16
   Google Scholar
• Spooner, D. (2008). Assessing the learning value of campus open spaces through post-occupancy evaluations. Planning for Higher Education, 36, 44–55
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, C.K. (2008). Explaining relationships among student outcomes and the school's physical environment. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19, 444–471
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R.S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 224--225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R.S., Zimring, C., Zhu, X., DuBose, J., Seo, H.-B., Choi, Y.-S., Joseph, A., et al. (2008). A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design (Part I). Health Environments Research & Design, 1, 61–125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velarde, M.D., Fry, G., & Tveit, M. (2007). Health effects of viewing landscapes – Landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6, 199–212
   Google Scholar
• Vischer, J.C. (2008). Toward an environmental psychology of workspace: How people are effected by environments for work. Architectural Science Review, 51, 97–108
   Google Scholar
• Vosko, R.S., & Hiemstra, R. (1988). The adult learning environment: Importance of physical features. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 7, 185–195
   Google Scholar
• Wong, C.Y., Sommer, R., & Cook, E.J. (1992). The soft classroom 17 years later. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 337–343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolner, P., Hall, E., Higgins, S., McCaughey, C., & Wall, K. (2007). A sound foundation? What we know about the impact of environments on learning and the implications for building schools for the future. Oxford Review of Education, 33, 47–70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar