Using design to drive organizational performance and innovation in the corporate workplace: implications for interprofessional environments

REFERENCES

• Adams, P.C. (2011). A taxonomy for communication geography. Progress in Human Geography, 35, 37–57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, P.S. (2001). Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12, 215–234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adrian, L.M. (2010). Active learning in large classes: Can small interventions produce greater results than are statistically predictable? The Journal of General Education, 59, 223–237
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J.A. (2011). Space and place. In J.A. Agnew and D.N. Livingstone (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of geographical knowledge (pp. 316–330). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T.J. and Henn, G.W. (2007). The organization and architecture of innovation: Managing the flow of technology. New York: Elsevier
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T.M., Barsade, S.G., Mueller, J.S., & Staw, B.M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367–403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnoldi, J. (2007). Universities and the public recognition of expertise. Minerva, 45, 49–61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacevice, P.A., & DeGraff, J. (2013). Leading innovation in a creative milieu. Kindai Management Review, 1, 118--131
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, R.M. (2007). Organizations as orientation systems: Some remarks on the aesthetic dimension of organizational design. In M. Shamiyeh & DOM Research Laboratory (Eds.), Organizing for change – Profession: Integrating architectural thinking in other fields (pp. 35–49). Boston: Birkhaüser
   Google Scholar
• Beekun, R.I., & Glick, W.H. (2001). Organizational structure from a loose coupling perspective: A multi-dimensional approach. Decision Sciences, 32, 227–250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, K.S., Quinn, R.E., DeGraff, J., & Thakor, A.V. (2006). Competing values leadership: Creating value in organizations. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D.T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, P.R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15, 555–568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, J. (2006). Behind the glass curtain: The design for Google's headquarters balances the company's utopian desire for transparency with its very real need for privacy. Metropolis, 25, 136–147
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, M. & Ross, P. (2011). VWork: Measuring the benefits of agility at work. Hampton Wick, Kingston upon Thames: Unwired Ventures, Ltd
   Google Scholar
• Djellal, F. & Gallouj, F. (2007). Innovation in hospitals: A survey of the literature. The European Journal of Health Economics, 8, 181–193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drucker, P.F. (1969). The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society. New York: Harper and Row
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, F. (2008). Work and the city. London: Black Dog Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, F., Craig, D., & Gillen, N. (2011). Purpose, process, place: Design as a research tool. Facilities, 29, 97–113
   Google Scholar
• Dugdale, S. (2009). Space strategies for the new learning landscape. Educause Review, 44, 50–63
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1893 [1997]). The division of labor in society. New York: The Free Press
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M., & Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25–32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsbach, K.D., & Bechky, B.A. (2007). It’s more than a desk: Working smarter through leveraged office design. California Management Review, 49, 80–101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayard, A., & Weeks, J. (2007). Photocopiers and water-coolers: The affordances of informal interaction. Organization Studies, 28, 605–634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, B., & Boynton, A. (2005). Virtuoso teams. Harvard Business Review, 83, 116–123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forlano, L. (2009). Wi-fi geographies: When code meets place. The Information Society, 25, 344–352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Ghandi. New York: Basic Books
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C.B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209–226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T.F. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 463–496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E.L. (2011). Triumph of the city: How our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, and happier. New York: The Penguin Press
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (1998). The end of geography or the explosion of place? Conceptualizing space, place, and information technology. Progress in Human Geography, 22, 165–185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumport, P.J., & Snydman, S.K. (2002). The formal organization of knowledge: An analysis of academic structure. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 375–408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallett, T., & Ventresca, M.J. (2006). How institutions form: Loose coupling as mechanism in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 908–924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, A., Wheeler, P., & Whitehead, C. (2004). The distributed workplace: Sustainable work environments. New York: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johns, T., & Gratton, L. (2013). The third wave of virtual work. Harvard Business Review, 91, 66–73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, K.C., Orlikowski, W.J., & Yates, J. (2006). Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organization Science, 17, 22–44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laing, A. (2006). North American office design at the start of the new millennium. In J. Worthington (Ed.), Reinventing the Workplace (2nd ed., pp. 235–258). New York: Elsevier
   Google Scholar
• Laing, A., Craig, D., & White, A. (2011). High-performance office space. Harvard Business Review, 89, 32–33
   Google Scholar
• Laurel, B. (2003). Introduction: Muscular design. In B. Laurel (Ed.), Design research: Methods and perspectives (pp. 16–19). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Leaman, A. (2006). The logistical city. In J. Worthington (Ed.), Reinventing the workplace (2nd ed., pp. 11–28). New York: Elsevier
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1991 [1974]). The production of space (Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, D., & Sensiper, S. (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Review, 40, 112–132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, D., & Swap, W. (1999). When sparks fly: Igniting creativity in groups. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
   Google Scholar
• Loch, C. (2003). Moving your idea through the organization: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. In B. Laurel (Ed.), Design research: Methods and perspectives (pp. 212–220). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, G. (1995). Origins and consequences of novelty. In S.M. Smith, T.B. Ward, & R.A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. (1996). City of bits: Space, place, and the infobahn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. (2005). After the revolution: Instruments of displacement. In G. Flachbart & P. Weibel (Eds.), Disappearing architecture: From real to virtual to quantum (pp. 18–23). Boston: Birkhaüser
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & von Krogh, G. (2009). Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20, 635–652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordquist, J., Kitto, S., Peller, J., Ygge, J., & Reeves, S. (2011). Focusing on future learning environments: Exploring the role of space and place for interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25, 391–393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D.A. (1988 [2002]). The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books
   Google Scholar
• Ogle, R. (2007). Smart world: Breakthrough creativity and the new science of ideas. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C.A. III, & Tushman, M.L. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California Management Review, 53, 5–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podolny, J.M., & Page, K.L. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57–76
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfield, D., Oandasan, I., & Reeves, S. (2011). Perceptions versus reality: A qualitative study of students’ expectations and experiences of interprofessional education. Medical Education, 45, 471–477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shusterman, R. (2005). Somaesthetics and Burke’s sublime. British Journal of Aesthetics, 45, 323–341
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D.K. (1983). Formal education, eminence, and dogmatism: The curvilinear relationship. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1, 149–162
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D.K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Soja, E.W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. New York: Verso
   Google Scholar
• Sorkin, M. (Ed.) (1992). Variations on a theme park: The new American city and the end of public space. New York: Hill and Wang
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26, 399–441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange, C.C., & Banning, J.H. (2001). Educating by design: Creating campus learning environments that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
   Google Scholar
• Sudjic, D. (2009). The language of things: Understanding the world of desirable objects. New York: W. W. Norton
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, F.W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper and Brothers
   Google Scholar
• Thakor, A. (2000). Becoming a better value creator. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
   Google Scholar
• Thibault, G. (2011). Interprofessional education: An essential strategy to accomplish the future of nursing goals. Journal of Nursing Education, 50, 313–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistlethwaite, J. (2012). Interprofessional education: A review of context, learning, and the research agenda. Medical Education, 46, 58–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, A., Simeti, A., Spiegel, D., Forlano, L., & Bacigulpo, T. (2011). Situating knowledge work in contemporary public spaces: Breakout! Escape from the Office. In M. Shepard (Ed.), Sentient City: Ubiquitous computing, architecture, and the future of urban space (pp. 128–151). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press and the Architectural League of New York
   Google Scholar
• von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K.E. (1998). Introductory essay: Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9, 543–555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington, J. (2006). Introduction: The changing workplace. In J. Worthington (Ed.), Reinventing the workplace (2nd ed., pp. 1–7). New York: Elsevier
   Google Scholar
• Zack, M.H. (2000). Jazz improvisation and organizing: Once more from the top. Organization Science, 11, 227–234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar