Improving chronic care through continuing education of interprofessional primary healthcare teams: a process evaluation

References

• Bamberger, M., Rao, V., & Woolcock, M. (2010). Using mixed methods in monitoring and evaluation. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Mixed methods in social & behavioural research (2nd ed., pp. 613–641). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Borkan, J. (1999). Immersion/crystallization. In B.F. Crabtree & W.L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 179–194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Bricker, P.L., Baron, R.J., Scheirer, J.J., DeWalt, D.A., Derrickson, J., Yunghans, S., & Gabbay, R.A. (2010). Collaboration in Pennsylvania: Rapidly spreading improved chronic care for patients to practices. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 30, 114–125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, H. (2005). Practical program evaluation: Assessing and improving planning, implementation, and effectiveness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, K., Mattke, S., Perrault, P.J., & Wagner, E.H. (2009). Untangling practice redesign from disease management: How do we best care for the chronically ill? Annual Review of Public Health, 30, 385–408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooksy, L.J., Gill, P., & Kelly, P.A. (2001). The program logic model as an integrative framework for a multimethod evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24, 119–128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabtree, B.F., Chase, S.M., Wise, C.G., Schiff, G.D., Schmidt, L.A., Goyzueta, J.R., Malouin, R.A., et al. (2011). Evaluation of patient centered medical home practice transformation initiatives. Medical Care, 49, 10–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis, D., O'Brien, M.A.T., Freemantle, N., Wolf, F.M., Mazmanian, P., & Taylor-Vaisey, A. (1999). Impact of formal continuing medical education: Do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 867–874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehar, M.A., Casswell, S., & Duignan, P. (1993). Formative and process evaluation of health promotion and disease prevention programs. Evaluation Review, 17, 204–220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckers, M., Wagner, C., & Groenewegen, P. (2008). Developing and testing an instrument to measure the presence of conditions for successful implementation of quality improvement collaboratives. BMC Health Services Research, 8, 172
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedberg, M.W., Hussey, P.S., & Schneider, E.C. (2010). Primary care: A critical review of the evidence on quality and costs of health care. Health Affairs, 29, 766–772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, M., Staley, C., Lydall-Smith, S., & Castle, D.J. (2008). Use of collaboration to improve outcomes in chronic disease. Disease Management & Health Outcomes, 16, 381–390
   Google Scholar
• Hammick, M., Freeth, D., Koppel, I., Reeves, S., & Barr, H. (2007). A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME guide no. 9. Medical Teacher, 29, 735–751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, S., Paquette-Warren, J., Roberts, S., Fournie, M., Thind, A., Ryan, B., Thorpe, C., et al. (2013). Results of a mixed-methods evaluation of partnerships for health: A quality improvement initiative for diabetes care. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 26, 711–719
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hutchison, B., Levesque, J.F., Strumpf, E., & Coyle, N. (2011). Primary health care in Canada: Systems in motion. Milbank Quarterly, 89, 256–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (2003). The breakthrough series: IHI's collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. Boston, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Retrieved from http://www.IHI.org
   Google Scholar
• Langley, G.J. (2009). The improvement guide: A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
   Google Scholar
• Marsteller, J.A., Shortell, S.M., Lin, M., Mendel, P., Dell, E., Wang, S., Cretin, S., et al. (2007). How do teams in quality improvement collaboratives interact? Joint Commission Journal on Quality & Patient Safety, 33, 267–276
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mills, P.D., & Weeks, W.B. (2004). Characteristics of successful quality improvement teams: Lessons from five collaborative projects in the VHA. Joint Commission Journal on Quality & Safety, 30, 152–162
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moretti, C., Kalucy, E., Hordacre, A., & Howard, S. (2010). South Australian divisions of general practice supporting diabetes care: Insights from reporting data. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 16, 60–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2010). Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. British Medical Journal, 341, c4587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. (2007). Preventing and managing chronic disease: Ontario's framework. Retrieved from http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/cdpm/pdf/framework_full.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ovretveit, J. (2002). How to run an effective improvement collaborative. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 15, 192–196
   Google Scholar
• Ovretveit, J., Bate, P., Cleary, P., Cretin, S., Gustafson, D., McInnes, K., McLeod, H., et al. (2002). Quality collaboratives: Lessons from research. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 11, 345–351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q. (1994). Developmental evaluation. Évaluation Practice, 15, 311–319
   Google Scholar
• Petrosino, A. (2000). Answering the why question in evaluation: The causal-model approach. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 15, 1–24
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, S., Goldman, J., Burton, A., & Sawatzky-Girling, B. (2010). Synthesis of systematic review evidence of interprofessional education. Journal of Allied Health, 39, 198–203
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rush, B., & Ogborne, A. (1991). Program logic models: Expanding their role and structure for program planning and evaluation. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 6, 93–106
   Google Scholar
• Schouten, L.M., Schouten, L.M., Hulscher, M.E., van Everdingen, J.J., Huijsman, R., & Grol, R.P. (2008). Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: Systematic review. British Medical Journal, 336, 1491–1494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroder, C., Medves, J., Paterson, M., Byrnes, V., Chapman, C., O'Riordan, A., Pichora, D., & Kelly, C. (2011). Development and pilot testing of the collaborative practice assessment tool. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25, 189–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solberg, L.I. (2007). Improving medical practice: a conceptual framework. Annals of Family Medicine, 5, 251–256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, E.H., Glasgow, R.E., Davis, C., Bonomi, A.E., Provost, L., McCulloch, D., Carver, P., & Sixta, C. (2001). Quality improvement in chronic illness care: A collaborative approach. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 27, 63–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson, T., Berwick, D.M., & Cleary, P.D. (2003). What do collaborative improvement projects do? Experience from seven countries. Joint Commission Journal on Quality & Safety, 29, 85–93
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2005). Preventing chronic diseases: A vital investment. WHO global report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/chp/chronic_disease_report/full_report.pdf
   Google Scholar