Appraising clinical guidelines and the development of criteria–a pilot study

References

• Brennan P., Silman A. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. British Medical Journal 1992; 304: 1491–1494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CLINICAL RESOURCE AND AUDIT GROUP. Clinical Guidelines: a Report of the Working Group set up by the Clinical Resource and Audit Group. Scottish Office, Edinburgh 1993
   Google Scholar
• Cluzeau F., Littlejohns P., Grimshaw J., Hopkins A. Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines. A Pilot Study of an Evaluation Instrument. Health Care Evaluation Unit, St George's Hospital Medical School. 1994a, Improving Clinical Effectiveness No 7
   Google Scholar
• Cluzeau F., Littlejohns P., Grimshaw J. Appraising clinical guidelines: towards a ‘which’ guide to purchasers. Quality in Health Care 1994b; 3: 121–122
   Google Scholar
• EFFECTIVE HEALTH CARE. Implementing Clinical Guidelines: Can Guidelines be Used to Improve Clinical Practice. University of Leeds, Leeds 1994, Bulletin No 8
   Google Scholar
• Feder G. Which guidelines to follow. British Medical Journal 1994a; 305: 785–786
   Google Scholar
• Feder G. Clinical guidelines in 1994. Let's be careful out there. British Medical Journal 1994b; 309: 1457–1458
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program, M. J. Field, K. N. Lohr. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1990, Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines, Institute of Medicine
   Google Scholar
• Guidelines for Clinical Practice, from Development to Use, Institute of Medicine, M. J. Field, K. N. Lohr. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1992
   Google Scholar
• Fink A., Kosecoff J., Chassin M., Brook R. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. American Journal of Public Health 1984; 74: 979–983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss J. L. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. Wiley, New York 1981
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw J. M. Guidelines, letter to the editor. British Medical Journal 1994; 308: 1511
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw J. M., Russell L T. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 1993; 342: 1317–1322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw J. M., Russell I. T. Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines; II. Ensuring that guidelines change medical practice. Quality in Health Care 1994; 3: 45–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grimshaw J. M., Eccles M., Russell I. T. Developing clinically valid guidelines. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1995, (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Haines A., Jones R. Implementing findings of research. British Medical Journal 1994; 308: 1488–1492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes B. Some problems in applying evidence in clinical practice, in: Doing more good than harm: the evaluation of health care interventions. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 1994; 703: 210–224
   Google Scholar
• Hayward R., Wilson M., Tunis S., Bass E., Rubin H., Haynes B. More informative abstracts of articles on clinical practice guidelines. Annals of Internal Medicine 1993; 118: 731–737
   Google Scholar
• Hayward R., Laupacis A. Initiating, conducting and maintaining guidelines development programmes. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1993; 148: 507–512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins A. Some reservations about clinical guidelines. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1995; 72: 70–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kraemer H. C. Ramifications of a population model for kappa as a coefficient of reliability. Psychometrika 1979; 44: 365–377
   Google Scholar
• Leape L., Park R., Kahan J., Brook R. Group judgements of appropriateness: the effect of panel composition. Quality Assurance in Health Care 1992; 4: 151–159
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lomas J. Teaching old (and not so old) docs new tricks: effective ways to implement research findings. Disseminating Research/Changing Behaviour. Research Methods for Primary Care, E. Dunn, et al. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks 1994
   Google Scholar
• Long A. Guidelines, protocols and outcomes. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 1994; 7: 4–7
   Google Scholar
• McKee M., Clarke A. Guidelines, enthusiasms, uncertainty, and the limits to purchasing. British Medical Journal 1995; 310: 101–104
   Google Scholar
• Oxman A., Guyatt G., Singer J., Goldsmith C, Hutchison B., Milner R., Streiner D. Agreement among reviewers of review articles. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1991; 44: 91–98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oxman A., Guyatt G. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1991; 44: 1271–1278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner C, Sampson P., Caplan R., Ward R., Cheney F. Measuring interrater reliability among multiple raters: an example of methods for nominal data. Statistics in Medicine 1990; 9: 1103–1115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott E., Black N. When does consensus exist in expert panels. Journal of Public Health Medicine 1991; 13: 35–39
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon T., Borowttz M. Changing the measure of Quality in the NHS: from purchasing activity to purchasing protocols. Quality in Health Care 1993; 2: 149, 1950
   Google Scholar
• Srvberg B. Professional Judgement. A Theoretical Model and Multi-Experiments in Nursing Professional Judgement. Lund University Press. 1993
   Google Scholar
• Streiner D., Norman G. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use. Oxford Medical Publications, New York 1989
   Google Scholar
• Woolf S. Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine. II: methods of developing guidelines. Archives of Internal Medicine 1992; 152: 946–952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar