Results of UAE in women under 40 years of age

References

• Pron G, Bennett J, Common A, Wall J, Asch M, Sniderman K. The Ontario Uterine Fibroid Embolization Trial. Part 2. Uterine fibroid reduction and symptom relief after uterine artery embolization for fibroids. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:120–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clerissi, Merland, Ravina JH, Aymard A, Ciraru-Vigneron, NJJJ. Embolisation des fibromes utérins : résultats sur 454 cas. Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité. 2003;31:597–605.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bouret, Ravina JH, Merland JJ, Ciraru-Vigneron NJM, Herbreteau D, Houdart E, et al. [Arterial embolization: a new treatment of menorrhagia in uterine fibroma]. Presse medicale. 1995;24–1754.
   Google Scholar
• Birnie, Hehenkamp WJ, Volkers NA, Broekmans FJ, de Jong FH, Themmen APE, et al. Loss of ovarian reserve after uterine artery embolization: a randomized comparison with hysterectomy. Human Reprod. 2007;22:1996–2005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tropeano G, Di Stasi C, Litwicka K, Romano D, Draisci G, Mancuso S. Uterine artery embolization for fibroids does not have adverse effects on ovarian reserve in regularly cycling women younger than 40 years. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:1055–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLucas B, Adler L, Perrella R. Uterine fibroid embolization: nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic fibroids. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192:95–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mara M, Maskova J, Fucikova Z, Kuzel D, Belsan T, Sosna O. Midterm clinical and first reproductive results of a randomized controlled trial comparing uterine fibroid embolization and myomectomy. Cardiovas Intervent Radiol. 2008;31:73–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang E, BrownB, Kirsop R, Stewart P, Stuart A. Efficacy of uterine artery embolisation for treatment of symptomatic fibroids and adenomyosis - an interim report on an Australian experience. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52:106–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spies JB, Ascher SA, Roth AR, Kim J, Levy EB, Gomez-Jorge J. Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:29–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Kooij SM, Hehenkamp WJK, Volkers NA, Birnie E, Ankum WM, et al. Uterine artery embolization vs hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 5-year outcome from the randomized EMMY trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:105.e1–e13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirst A, Dutton S, Wu O, Briggs A, Edwards C, Waldenmaier L, et al. A multi-centre retrospective cohort study comparing the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of hysterectomy and uterine artery embolisation for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. The HOPEFUL study. Health Technol Assess. 2008;12:1–248, iii.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lurie S, PIper I, Woliovitch I, Glezerman M. Age-related prevalence of sonographicaly confirmed uterine myomas. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;25:42–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mclucas B, Danzer H, Wambach C, Lee C. Ovarian reserve following uterine artery embolization in women of reproductive age: A preliminary report. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2013;22:45–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MD, Lee HS, Lee MH, Kim HJ, Cho JH, Cha SH. Long-term results of symptomatic fibroids treated with uterine artery embolization: In conjunction with MR evaluation. Eur J Radiol. 2010;73:339–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan A, Lee AS, Kuo GP, Powe N, Kim HS. Uterine Artery Embolization versus Abdominal Myomectomy: A Long-term Clinical Outcome Comparison. J Vascular Intervent Radiol. 2010;21:1011–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan A, Lee AS, Kuo GP, Powe N, Kim HS. Uterine Artery Embolization versus Abdominal Myomectomy: A Long-term Clinical Outcome Comparison. J Vascular Intervent Radiol. 2010;21:1011–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Specific fertility rates by age and total fertility rates for female by prefectures: 1986. Jinko Mondai Kenkyu. 1988;186:74–5.
   Google Scholar
• Reed SD, Newton KM, Thompson LB, McCrummen BA, Warolin AK. The incidence of repeat uterine surgery following myomectomy. J Women's Health. 2006;15:1046–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington-Kirsch R, Spies JB, Myers ER, Mulgund J, Mauro M, Pron G, et al. The Fibroid Registry for outcomes data (FIBROID) for uterine embolization: short-term outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:52–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLucas B. Pregnancy following uterine artery embolization: An update. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2013;22:39–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pron G, Mocarski E, Bennett J, Vilos G, Common A, Vanderburgh L, et al. Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: the Ontario multicenter trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:67–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter TT, Walker WJ. Pregnancy following uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic fibroids: a series of 26 completed pregnancies. BJOG. 2005;112:321–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananthakrishnan G, Murray L, Ritchie M, Murray G, Bryden F, Lassman S, et al. Randomized Comparison of uterine artery embolization (UAE) with surgical treatment in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids (REST Trial): subanalysis of 5-Year MRI findings. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012;1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid S, Khaund A, Murray LS, Moss JG, Cooper K, Lyons D, et al. The effects of uterine artery embolisation and surgical treatment on ovarian function in women with uterine fibroids. BJOG. 2010;117:985–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker WJ, Barton-Smith P. Long-term follow up of uterine artery embolisation—an effective alternative in the treatment of fibroids. BJOG. 2006;113:464–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar