Encounter as a dimension of social inclusion for people with intellectual disability: Beyond and between community presence and participation

References

• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006). General Social Survey: Summary results (Cat. No. 4159.0). Canberra, ACT: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2008). Disability in Australia: Intellectual disability (Bulletin No. 67, Cat. No. AUS 110).Canberra, ACT: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, M. (1986). Take it to the streets: Conflict and community in public space. Dissent, 33, 476–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., & Clement, T. (2010). Social inclusion of people with more severe intellectual disability relocated to the community between 1999–2009: Problems of dedifferentiated policy? In. C. Bigby & C. Fyffe More than community presence: Social inclusion for people with intellectual disability. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Roundtable on Intellectual Disability Policy (pp. 30–40). Bundoora, Australia: La Trobe University.
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Clement, T., Mansell, J., & Beadle-Brown, J. (2009). ‘It's pretty hard with our ones, they can't talk, the more able bodied can participate’: Staff attitudes about the applicability of disability policies to people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53, 363–376. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01154.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, J. (2010). Introduction to Counterpoint. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54 (Suppl. 1), 1–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01244.x
   Google Scholar
• Clement, T., & Bigby, C. (2009). Breaking out of a distinct social space: Reflections on supporting community participation for people with severe and profound intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disability, 22, 264–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2008.00458.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, T., & Bigby, C. (2010) .Group homes for people with intellectual disabilities: Encouraging inclusion and participation. London, UK: Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Human Services. (2002). Victorian State Disability Plan 2002–2012. Melbourne, Australia: Disability Services Division.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, E., Malam, S., Davies, I., & Spencer, K. (2005). Adults with learning difficulties in England 2003/4. London, UK: NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Felce, D., Lowe, K., & Jones, E. (2002). Association between the provision of characteristics and operation of supported housing services and resident outcomes. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 15, 404–418. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-3148.2002.00131.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., & Iveson, K. (2008). Planning and diversity in the city: Redistribution, recognition and encounter. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester-Jones, R., Carpenter, J., Coolen-Schrijner, P., Cambridge, P., Tate, A., Beecham, J., … Wooff, D. (2006). The social networks of people with intellectual disability living in the community 12 years after resettlement from long-stay hospitals. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 19, 285–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2006.00263.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B. (2004). Deprogramming planning: Collaboration and inclusion in new urban development. Urban Policy and Research, 22, 315–322. doi: 10.1080/0811114042000269326
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin University Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2005). Disability in Australia: Exposing a social apartheid. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. (2010). Spaces of social inclusion and belonging for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54 (Suppl. 1), 48–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01237.x
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H., Douglas, J., Bigby, C., & Iacono, T. (Forthcoming). Social interaction with adults who have limited communication skills: Having fun and hanging out. Journal of Applied Intellectual Disability Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kozma, A., Mansell, J., & Beadle-Brown, J. (2009). Outcomes in different residential settings for people with intellectual disability: A systematic review. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 114, 193–222. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-114.3.193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laurier, E., Whyte, A., & Buckner, K. (2002). Neighbouring as an occasioned activity: “Finding a lost cat”. Space and Culture, 5, 346–367. doi: 10.1177/1206331202005004003
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, J., Beadle-Brown, J., Whelton, B., Beckett, C., & Hutchinson, A. (2008). Effect of service structure and organization on staff care practices in small community homes for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 21, 398–413. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2007.00410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, J., & Lyle, C. (1987). A framework for accomplishment. Decatur, GA: Responsive Systems Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Pentland, D., Cincotta, K., & Annisson, J. (1995). Doug's story: The struggle for a fair go. Burwood, Victoria: School of Studies in Disability, Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, J., & Emerson, E. (2007). Review of evaluative research on case management for people with intellectual disabilities. In Bigby C., Fyffe C., & Ozanne E. (Eds.), Planning and support for people with intellectual disabilities: Issues for case managers and other professionals (pp. 280–299). London, UK: Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. (1994). Flesh and stone: The body and the city in Western civilization. London, UK: Faber and Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Tajbakhsh, K. (2001). The promise of the city: Space, identity, and politics in contemporary social thought. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2006).Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Retrieved August 20, 2007, from http://www.un.org/disabilities
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 323–337. doi: 10.1177/0309133308089372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdonschot, M. M. L., de Witte, L. P., Reichrath, E., Buntinx, W. H. E., & Curfs, L. M. G. (2009). Community participation of people with an intellectual disability: A review of empirical findings. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53, 303–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01144.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinson, T. (2009). A compendium of social inclusion indicators. How's Australia faring? A compilation of comparative data undertaken by the Australian Social Inclusion Board to inform its advisory work. Canberra, ACT: Australian Social Inclusion Board—Indicators Working Group.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, P. (1995). Community based is not community: The social geography of disability. In Taylor S. J., Bogdan R. & Lutfiyya Z. M. (Eds.), The variety of community experience: Qualitative studies of family and community life (pp. 175–192). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar