References
- Ahmed, S., Bryant, L., & Hewison, J. (2007). ‘Balance’ is in the eye of the beholder: Providing information to support informed choices in antenatal screening via Antenatal Screening Web Resource. Health Expectations, 10, 309–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00455.x
- Ahmed, S., Hewison, J., Green, J. M., Cuckle, H. S., Hirst, J., & Thornton, J. G. (2008). Decisions about testing and termination of pregnancy for different fetal conditions: A qualitative study of European white and Pakistani mothers of affected children. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17, 560–572. doi: 10.1007/s10897-008-9176-x
- Asch, A. (1999). Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: A challenge to practice and policy. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1649–1657. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.89.11.1649
- Bijma, H. H., van der Heide, A., & Wildschut, H. I. J. (2008). Decision-making after ultrasound diagnosis of fetal abnormality. Reproductive Health Matters, 16, 82–89. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(08)31372-X
- Boyd, P. A., DeVigan, C., Khoshnood, B., Loane, M., Garne, E., Dolk H., & the EUROCAT Working Group. (2008). Survey of prenatal screening policies in Europe for structural malformations and chromosome anomalies, and their impact on detection and termination rates for neural tube defects and Down's syndrome. BJOG, 115, 689–696. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01700.x
- Britt, D. W., Risinger, S. T., Miller, V., Mans, M. K., Krivchenia, E.L., & Evans, M.I. (2000). Determinants of parental decisions after the prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: Bringing in context. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 93, 410–416.
- Bundesdatenschutzgesetz, § 3 and § 4 (1990). Retrieved from http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/index.html
- Code de la Santé Publique, art. L 1122-1 (2004). Retrieved from http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr
- Code Pénal, art. L 223-15-2 (2000). Retrieved from http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Drugan, A., Greb, A., Johnson, M. P., Krivchenia, E. L., Uhlmann, W. R., Moghissi, K. S., & Evans, M. I. (1990). Determinants of parental decisions to abort for chromosome abnormalities. Prenatal Diagnosis, 10, 483–490. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970100802
- Durand, M.-A., Stiel, M., Boivin, J., & Elwyn, G. (2010). Information and decision support needs of parents considering amniocentesis: Interviews with pregnant women and health professionals. Health Expectations, 13, 125–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00544.x
- Etchegary, H., Potter, B., Howley, H., Cappelli, M., Coyle, D., Graham, I., … & Wilson, B. (2008). The influence of experiential knowledge on prenatal screening and testing decisions. Genetic Testing, 12, 115–124. doi: 10.1089/gte.2007.0057
- France, E. F., Wyke, S., Ziebland, S., Entwistle, V. A., & Hunt, K. (2011). How personal experiences feature in women's accounts of use of information for decisions about antenatal diagnostic testing for foetal abnormality. Social Science & Medicine, 72, 755–762. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.031
- Hewison, J., Green, J. M., Ahmed, S., Cuckle, H. S., Hirst, J., Hucknall, C., & Thornton, J. G. (2007). Attitudes to prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality: A comparison of white and Pakistani women in the UK. Prenatal Diagnosis, 27, 419–430. doi: 10.1002/pd.1701
- Hsieh, Y., & Brennan, P. F. (2005). What are pregnant women's information needs and information seeking behaviors prior to their prenatal genetic counseling? AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings Archive, 2005, 355–359.
- Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Korenromp, M. J., Page-Christiaens, G. C. M. L., van den Bout, J., Mulder, E. J. H., & Visser, G. H. A. (2007). Maternal decision to terminate pregnancy in case of Down syndrome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 196, 149.e1–149e. 11.
- Kramer, R. L., Jarve, R. K., Yaron, Y., Johnson, M. P., Lampinen, J., Kasperski, S. B., & Evans, M. I. (1998). Determinants of parental decisions after the prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 79, 172–174.
- Levy, V. (1999). Maintaining equilibrium: A grounded theory study of the processes involved when women make informed choices during pregnancy. Midwifery, 15, 109–119. doi: 10.1016/S0266-6138(99)90007-4
- Parens, E., & Asch, A. (2003). Disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: Reflections and recommendations. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 9, 40–47. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.10056
- Roberts, C. D., Stough, L. M., & Parrish, L. H. (2002). The role of genetic counseling in the elective termination of pregnancies involving fetuses with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 36, 48–55. doi: 10.1177/00224669020360010501
- St-Jacques, S., Grenier, S., Charland, M., Forest, J.-C., Rousseau, F., & Légaré, F. (2008). Decisional needs assessment regarding Down syndrome prenatal testing: A systematic review of the perceptions of women, their partners and health professionals. Prenatal Diagnosis, 28, 1183–1203. doi: 10.1002/pd.2059
- Strafgesetzbuch, § 291 (1997). Retrieved from http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/index.html
- Ville, I. (2011). Disability policies and perinatal medicine: The difficult conciliation of two fields of intervention on disability. Alter, 5, 16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.alter.2010.11.002
- Zlotogora, J. (2002). Parental decisions to abort or continue a pregnancy with an abnormal finding after an invasive prenatal test. Prenatal Diagnosis, 22, 1102–1106. doi: 10.1002/pd.472