Participation and service access rights for people with intellectual disability: A role for law?

References

• Adult Guardianship and Trusteeship Act (2008) (Alberta, Canada).
   Google Scholar
• Alberta. (2007). Legislative review of the Dependent Adults Act and the Personal Directives Act: Final report and recommendations. Calgary, Canada: Government of Alberta, Legislative Review.
   Google Scholar
• Alberta. (2009).Frequently asked questions: Adult Guardianship and Trusteeship Act. Retrieved 7 April 2012, from http://www.justice.gov.ab.ca/public_trustee/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Bach, M., & Kerzner, L. (2010). A new paradigm for protecting autonomy and the right to legal capacity. Retrieved July 27, 2011, from http://www.lco-cdo.org/en/disabilities-call-for-papers-bach-kerzner
   Google Scholar
• Banks, P., Jahoda, A., Dagnan, D., Kemp, J., & Williams, V. (2010). Supported employment for people with intellectual disability: The effects of job breakdown on psychological well-being. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 23, 344–354. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2009.00541.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, P. (2011, July). The CRPD and mental capacity in England: Thinking about the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Paper presented at the 32nd International Congress on Law and Mental Health, Humboldt University, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, K., Wilberforce, M., & Glendinning, C. (2011). Personal budgets and the workforce implications for social care providers: Expectations and early experiences. Social Policy and Society, 10, 55–65. doi: 10.1017/S1474746410000382
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C. (2010). A five-country comparative review of accommodation support policies for older people with intellectual disability. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 7, 3–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-1130.2010.00242.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., & Tait, S. (2004). Evaluation of the independent review of a major life decision affecting people who have an intellectual disability. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 11, 202–213. doi: 10.1375/pplt.2004.11.2.202
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Webber, R., & Bowers, B. (2012). Relationships in later life between group home residents with intellectual disability, their siblings and staff. In Bigby C. & Fyffe C. (Eds.), Services and families working together to support adults with intellectual disability: Proceedings of the Sixth Roundtable on Intellectual Disability Policy(p. 23–32). Bundoora, Australia: La Trobe University.
   Google Scholar
• Burningham, S. (2009). Developments in Canadian Adult Guardianship and Co-decision-making Law. Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies, 18, 119–156.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, F.K. (2005). Legislating disability: Negative ontologies and the government of legal identities. In Tremain S. (Ed.), Foucault and the government of disability. (pp. 108–132). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, A.C. (2009). On the margins of citizenship: Intellectual disability and civil rights in twentieth-century America. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, T. (1989). The limits and the social legacy of guardianship in Australia. Federal Law Review, 18, 231–266.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, T. (2001). Re-mixing ‘access’, ‘advocacy’, ‘empowerment’ and ‘protection’? A case for a specialised division of labour in guardianship, mental health and disability services adjudication?Newcastle Law Review,5, 43–64.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, T. (2012). Guardianship, “social” citizenship and theorising substitute decision-making law. In Doron I. & Soden A.M. (Eds.), Beyond elder law: New directions in law and aging (pp. 1–17). New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-25972-2_1
   Google Scholar
• Carney, T., & Akers, K. (1991). A coffee table chat or a formal hearing. Australian Dispute Resolution Journal, 2, 141–158.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, T., & Keyzer, P. (2007a). Planning for the future: Arrangements for the assistance of people planning for the future of people with impaired capacity. Queensland University of Technology Law and Justice Journal, 7, 255–278.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, T., & Keyzer, P. (2007b). Private trusts and succession planning for the severely disabled or cognitively impaired in Australia. Bond Law Review, 19(2), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Citizens Information Act 2007 (Ireland).
   Google Scholar
• Dependent Adults Act 1978 (Alberta, Canada).
   Google Scholar
• Dhanda, A. (2007). Legal capacity in the disability rights convention: Stranglehold of the past or lodestar for the future. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 34, 429–462.
   Google Scholar
• Disability Act 2006 (No. 23). (2006). Melbourne, Vic.: Victorian Department of Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, M.C., Clare, I.C.H., & Holland, A.J. (2010). Living ‘a life like ours’: Support workers’ accounts of substitute decision-making in residential care homes for adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54, 144–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01228.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, M., & Canobi, S. (2011). A long-term disability care and support scheme for Australia: Opportunities for disability sector reform. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 5, 138–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-1411.2011.00049.x
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, K.R., Gleeson, R., Edwards, R., Purcal, C., Sitek, T., Dinning, B., … Thompson, D. (2010). Effectiveness of individual funding approaches for disability support (Occasional Paper no. 29). Canberra, Australia: Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, E. (2010). A socio-legal analysis of advocacy for people with disabilities: Competing concepts of ‘best interests’ and empowerment in legislation and policy on statutory advocacy services. Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 32, 23–36. doi: 10.1080/09649061003675840
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, R.M. (2000). The emergence of assisted (supported) decision-making in the Canadian law of adult guardianship and substitute decision-making. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 23, 61–77. doi: 10.1016/S0160-2527(99)00034-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, E. (2010). Spaces of social inclusion and belonging for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54, 48–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01237.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, J., & Stuttaford, M.(Eds.). (2010). Global health and human rights: Legal and philosophical perspectives. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Joffe, K. (2010). Enforcing the rights of people with disabilities in Ontario's developmental services system. Retrieved July 27, 2011, from http://www.lco-cdo.org/disabilities/joffe.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H., Douglas, J., Bigby, C., & Iacono, T. (2010). The pearl in the middle: A case study of social interactions in an individual with a severe intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 35, 175–186. doi: 10.3109/13668250.2010.501026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laragy, C. (2010). Snapshot of flexible funding outcomes in four countries. Health and Social Care in the Community, 18, 129–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00880.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laragy, C., & Ottmann, G. (2011). Towards a framework for implementing individual funding based on an Australian case study. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 8, 18–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-1130.2011.00283.x
   Google Scholar
• Lutfiyya, Z. M., Updike, M.-A., Schwartz, K., & Mactavish, J. (2007). Report on the examination of the implementation and impact of the Vulnerable Persons Living with a Mental Disability Act (VPA) (Community Living – Manitoba, 2007). Retrieved November 16, 2011, from http://umanitoba.academia.edu/MaryAnnUpdike/Papers/1004398/Report_on_the_Examination_of_the_Implementation_and_Impact_of_The_Vulnerable_Persons_Living_with_a_Mental_Disability_Act_with_a_Mental_Disability_Act_VPA
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T.H. (1963). Sociology at the crossroads and other essays. London, UK: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• McConkey, R., & Collins, S. (2010). The role of support staff in promoting the social inclusion of persons with an intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54, 691–700. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01295.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Public Advocate South Australia (OPA[SA]). (2010). Submission to the Productivity Commission: Inquiry into Disability Care and Support (August 2010). Retrieved from http://www.opa.sa.gov.au/cgi-bin/wf.pl?pid=&mode=cd&file=../html/documents/09_Publications/Papers
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Public Advocate South Australia (OPA[SA]). (2011a). Developing a model of practice for supported decision making. Collinswood, South Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Public Advocate South Australia (OPA[SA]). (2011b). South Australian Supported Decision Making Project: August 2011 update. Retrieved from http://www.opa.sa.gov.au/cgi-bin/wf.pl?pid
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, R. (2011). Disabling or enabling: The extension of work-related conditionality to disabled people. Social Policy and Society, 10, 309–320. doi: 10.1017/S1474746411000042
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. (2011a). Disability care and support (Report no. 54). Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. (2011b). Disability care and support: Draft report. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Reindal, S.M. (1999). Independence, dependence, interdependence: Some reflections on the subject and personal autonomy. Disability & Society, 14, 353–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, G., & Genn, H. (2007). Tribunals in transition: Resolution or adjudication?Public Law, 2007(Spring), 116–141.
   Google Scholar
• Salzman, L. (2010). Rethinking guardianship (again): Substituted decision making as a violation of the integration mandate of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. University of Colorado Law Review,81, 157–245. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1523387
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. London, UK: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Servicesand Supports to Promote the Social Inclusion of Persons with Developmental Disabilities Act 2008 (Ontario, Canada).
   Google Scholar
• Šiška, J., & Beadle-Brown, J. (2011). Developments on deinstitutionalization and community living in the Czech Republic. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 8, 125–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-1130.2011.00298.x
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Government Department of Human Services. (2006). About the Disability Act 2006. Retrieved July 27, 2011, from http://www.dhs.vic.gov.au/disability/improving_supports/disability_act_2006
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Government Office of the Disability Services Commissioner. (2010). Annual report. Melbourne, Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Law Reform Commission (VLRC). (2011). Guardianship: Consultation paper 10. Melbourne, Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Law Reform Commission (VLRC). (2012). Guardianship: Final report. Melbourne, Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• The Vulnerable Persons Living with a Mental Disability Act 1993 (CCSM c V90; Manitoba, Canada).
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. (2012). Supported decision making for people with severe to profound intellectual disability: “We're all in this together, aren't we?”In Bigby C. & Fyffe C. (Eds.), Services and families working together to support adults with intellectual disability (Proceedings of the Sixth Roundtable on Intellectual Disability Policy, pp. 38–47). Bundoora, Australia: La Trobe University.
   Google Scholar