3,920
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Recent health data

eHealth in support for daily functioning of people with intellectual disability: Views of service users, relatives, and professionals on both its advantages and disadvantages and its facilitating and impeding factors

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Allen, D. (1999). Mediator analysis: An overview of recent research on carers supporting people with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 43, 325–339. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.1999.00209.x
  • Boot, F. H., Owuor, J., Dinsmore, J., & MacLachlan, M. (2018). Access to assistive technology for people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 62, 900–921. doi: 10.1111/jir.12532
  • Chalghoumi, H., Cobigo, V., Dignard, C., Gauthier-Beaupré, A., Jutai, J. W., Lachapelle, Y., … Perrin, M. (2017). Information privacy for technology users with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Why does it matter? Ethics & Behavior, 1–17.
  • Cho, J., Park, D., & Lee, H. E. (2014). Cognitive factors of using health apps: Systematic analysis of relationships among health consciousness, health information orientation, eHealth literacy, and health app use efficacy. Journal of Medical Internal Research, 16(5), e125.
  • Clifford Simplican, S., Shivers, C., Chen, J., & Leader, G. (2018). “With a Touch of a Button”: staff perceptions on integrating technology in an Irish service provider for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31, e130–e139. doi: 10.1111/jar.12350
  • Cooney, P., Jackman, C., Coyle, D., & O'Reilly, G. (2017). Computerised cognitive–behavioural therapy for adults with intellectual disability: Randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 211, 95–102. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.117.198630
  • Ekeland, A. G., Bowes, A., & Flottorp, S. (2010). Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79, 736–771. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.08.006
  • Eysenbach, G. (2001). What is e-health? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3(2).
  • Guion, L. A., Diehl, D. C., & McDonald, D. (2017). Triangulation: Establishing the validity of qualitative studies. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
  • Gutiérrez, P., & Martorell, A. (2011). People with intellectual disability and ICTs. Comunicar Scientific Journal of Media Literacy, 18, 173–180. doi: 10.3916/C36-2011-03-09
  • Hardiker, N. R., & Grant, M. J. (2011). Factors that influence public engagement with eHealth: A literature review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 80, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.10.017
  • Hutchesson, M. J., Rollo, M. E., Krukowski, R., Ells, L., Harvey, J., Morgan, P. J., … Collins, C. E. (2015). Ehealth interventions for the prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Obesity Reviews, 16, 376–392. doi: 10.1111/obr.12268
  • Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed). California: SAGE Publications.
  • Kitzinger, J., & Barbour, R. (1999). Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus groups. In R. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.). Developing focus group research. Politics, theory and practice (pp. 1–20). London, UK: Sage Publications.
  • Nieboer, M. E., van Hoof, J., van Hout, A. M., Aarts, S., & Wouters, E. J. M. (2014). Professional values, technology and future health care: The view of health care professionals in The Netherlands. Technology in Society, 39, 10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.05.003
  • Niemeijer, A. R., Frederiks, B. J., Riphagen, I. I., Legemaate, J., Eefsting, J. A., & Hertogh, C. M. (2010). Ethical and practical concerns of surveillance technologies in residential care for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities: An overview of the literature. International Psychogeriatrics, 22, 1129–1142. doi: 10.1017/S1041610210000037
  • van Oorsouw, W. M. W. J., Theeven, P. J. R., Leenders, A., Vermeulen, J., & Embregts, P. J. C. M. (2019). Agreement about the fulfillment of autonomy, relatedness, and competence? Perceptions of people with intellectual disabilities, support staff and family members. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Oosterveen, E., Tzelepis, F., Ashton, L., & Hutchesson, M. J. (2017). A systematic review of eHealth behavioral interventions targeting smoking, nutrition, alcohol, physical activity and/or obesity for young adults. Preventive Medicine, 99, 197–206. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.01.009
  • Ossebaard, H., & Idzardi, K. (2013). Omgaan met de risico's van eHealth [Dealing with the risks of eHealth]. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu.
  • Oudshoorn, C. E. M., Frielink, N., Nijs, S. L. P., & Embregts, P. J. C. M. (2020). eHealth for supporting people with mild intellectual disability in daily life: A systematic review. Manuscript resubmitted for publication.
  • Palmer, S., Wehmeyer, M., Davies, D., & Stock, S. (2012). Family members’ reports of the technology use of family members with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 402–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01489.x
  • Parsons, S., Daniels, H., Porter, J., & Robertson, C. (2008). Resources, staff beliefs and organizational culture: Factors in the use of information and communication technology for adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 21, 19–33.
  • Perry, J., Beyer, S., & Holm, S. (2009). Assistive technology, telecare and people with intellectual disabilities: Ethical considerations. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 81–86. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.024588
  • Ramsten, C., Martin, L., Dag, M., & Marmstål Hammar, L. (2019). A balance of social inclusion and risks: Staff perceptions of information and communication technology in the daily life of young adults with mild to moderate intellectual disability in a social care context. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 16, 171–179. doi: 10.1111/jppi.12278
  • Schalken, F. (2013). Handboek online hulpverlening: Met Internet zorg en welzijn verbeteren [Handbook online services: Improving care and well-being through the Internet]. Houten, The Netherlands: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.
  • Schnall, R., Travers, J., Rojas, M., & Carballo-Diéguez, A. (2014). Ehealth interventions for HIV prevention in high-risk men who have sex with men: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(5), e134. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3393
  • Scott, H. M., & Havercamp, S. M. (2018). Comparisons of self and proxy report on health-related factors in people with intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31, 927–936. doi: 10.1111/jar.12452
  • Spijkerman, M. P. J., Pots, W. T. M., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2016). Effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions in improving mental health: A review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clinical Psychology Review, 45, 102–114. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.03.009
  • Stancliffe, R. J., & Lakin, K. C. (2007). Independent living. In S. L. Odom, R. H. Horner, M. E. Snell, & J. Blacher (Eds.), Handbook of developmental disabilities (pp. 429–448). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Taber-Doughty, T., Shurr, J., Brewer, J., & Kubik, S. (2010). Standard care and telecare services: Comparing the effectiveness of two service systems with consumers with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54, 843–859. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01314.x
  • Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237–246. doi: 10.1177/1098214005283748
  • Thompson, J. R., Bradley, V. J., Buntinx, W. H., Schalock, R. L., Shogren, K. A., Snell, M. E., … Yeager, M. H. (2009). Conceptualizing supports and the support needs of people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 135–146. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-47.2.135
  • Timmer, S. (2014). Ehealth in de langdurige zorg [eHealth in long-term care]. Houten, The Netherlands: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.
  • Vereenooghe, L., Gega, L., & Langdon, P. E. (2017). Intellectual disability and computers in therapy: Views of service users and clinical psychologists. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11(1). doi: 10.5817/CP2017-1-11
  • Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 92–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x
  • Wennberg, B., & Kjellberg, A. (2010). Participation when using cognitive assistive devices–from the perspective of people with intellectual disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 17, 168–176. doi: 10.1002/oti.296
  • de Wit, J., Dozeman, E., Ruwaard, J., Alblas, J., & Riper, H. (2015). Web-based support for daily functioning of people with mild intellectual disabilities or chronic psychiatric disorders: A feasibility study in routine practice. Internet Interventions, 2, 161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2015.02.007
  • Zaagsma, M., Volkers, K. M., Schippers, A. P., Wilschut, J. A., & Van Hove, G. (2019). An exploratory study of the support needs in 24/7 online support for people with mild intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 16, 78–87. doi: 10.1111/jppi.12275