A process of decision-making support: Exploring supported decision-making practice in Canada

References

• Arstein-Kerslake, A. (2016). An empowering dependency: Exploring support for the exercise of legal capacity. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 18(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2014.941926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arstein-Kerslake, A. (2016). Legal capacity and supported decision-making: Respecting rights and empowering people. SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2818153
   Google Scholar
• Bach, M. (1998). Securing self-determination: Building the agenda in Canada. http://www.communitylivingbc.ca/what_we_do/innovation/pdf/Securing_the_Agenda_for_Self-Determination.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bach, M., & Kerzner, L. (2010). A new paradigm for protecting autonomy and the right to legal capacity (Report prepared for the Law Commission of Ontario) http://www.lco-cdo.org/en/disabilities-call-for-papers-bach-kerzner
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Douglas, J., Carney, T., Then, S., Wiesel, I., & Smith, E. (2017b). Delivering decision-making support to people with cognitive disability: What has been learned from pilot programs in Australia from 2010-2015. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 52(3), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Whiteside, M., & Douglas, J. (2019). Providing support for decision making to adults with intellectual disabilities: Perspectives of family members and workers in disability support services. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 44(4), 396–409. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2017.1378873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning, M. (2018). Developing an understanding of supported decision-making practice in Canada: The experiences of people with intellectual disabilities and their supporters [Doctoral dissertation]. La Trobe University.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, T. (2012). Guardianship, citizenship, and theorizing substitute-decision making law. In I. Doron, & A. Soden (Eds.), Beyond Elder Law: New Directions in Law and Ageing (pp. 1–17). Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, C. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, C. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2014). General Comment No 1 (2014) Article 12: Equal recognition before the law. Geneva. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G14/031/20/PDF/G1403120.pdf?OpenElement
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dhanda, A. (2007). Legal capacity in the disability rights convention: Stranglehold of the past or lodestar for the future? Syracuse Journal International Law and Commerce, 34, 429–462.
   Google Scholar
• DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinerstein, R. (2012). Implementing legal capacity under Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with disabilities: The difficult road from guardianship to supported decision-making. Human Rights Brief, 19(2), 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, M. (2019). Deciding in dementia: The possibilities and limits of supported decision-making. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 66, 101466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J., & Bigby, C. (2020). Development of an evidence-based practice framework to guide decision making support for people with cognitive impairment due to acquired brain injury or intellectual disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(3), 434–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1498546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dye, L., Hare, D. J., & Hendy, S. (2007). Capacity of people with intellectual disabilities to consent to take part in a research study. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 20(2), 168–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2006.00310.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetherstonhaugh, D., Tarzia, L., Bauer, M., Nay, R., & Beattie, E. (2016). “The red dress or the blue?” How do staff perceive that they support decision-making for people with dementia living in residential aged care facilities? Journal of Applied Gerontology, 35(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464814531089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. P., & Silvers, A. (2007). Liberalism and individually scripted ideas of the good: Meeting the challenge of dependent agency. Social Theory and Practice, 33(2), 311–334. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200733229
   Google Scholar
• Gooding, P. (2015). Navigating the ‘flashing amber lights’ of the right to legal capacity in the United Nations convention of the rights of persons with disabilities: Responding to major concerns. Human Rights Law Review, 15(1), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngu045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, R., & Taşciouğlu, E. (2018). Supported decision-making from theory to practice: Implementing the right to enjoy legal capacity. Societies, 8(2), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8020025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, W. (2008). Representation agreements in British Columbia: Who is using them and why? [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• James, K., & Watts, L. (2014). Understanding the lived experiences of supported decision-making in Canada: Legal capacity, decision-making and guardianship (Report commissioned by the Law Commission of Ontario). https://www.lco-cdo.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/capacity-guardianship-commissioned-paper-ccel.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H., Watson, J., Iacono, T., Bloomberg, K., & West, D. (2012). Assessing communication in people with severe-profound disabilities. Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language, 14(2), 64–68. http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30078913
   Google Scholar
• Knox, L. (2016c). The experience of being supported to participate in decision-making after severe traumatic brain injury [Doctoral dissertation]. La Trobe University.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, L., Douglas, J. M., & Bigby, C. (2015). ‘The biggest thing is trying to live for two people’: Spousal experiences of supporting decision-making participation for partners with TBI. Brain Injury, 29(6), 745–757. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2015.1004753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, L., Douglas, J. M., & Bigby, C. (2016a). Becoming a decision-making supporter for someone with acquired cognitive disability following traumatic brain injury. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 3(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23297018.2015.1077341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, L., Douglas, J. M., & Bigby, C. (2016b). “I won’t be around forever”: understanding the decision-making experiences of adults with severe TBI and their parents. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 26(2), 236–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2015.1019519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, O. (2010). The expressive, educational and proactive roles of human rights: An analysis of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with disabilities. In B. McSherry, & P. Weller (Eds.), Rethinking rights-based mental health laws (pp. 97–128). Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Malette, P. (2002). Lifestyle quality and person centred support. Jeff, Janet, Stephanie and the microboard project. In S. Holburn, & P. M. Vietze (Eds.), Person centred planning research practice and future directions (pp. 151–179). Paul H Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Pujalte, A. (2019). Legal capacity and supported decision-making: Lessons from some recent legal reforms. Laws, 8(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws8010004
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2012). A realist approach for qualitative research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, J., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. (2006). Adopting a constructivist approach to grounded theory: Implications for research design. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 12(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2006.00543.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (2007). Sampling in grounded theory. In A. Bryant, & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of grounded theory (pp. 229–244). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nidus Personal Planning and Resource Centre. (2010). A study of personal planning in British Columbia: Representation agreements with standard powers. http://www.nidus.ca/?page_id=234
   Google Scholar
• Nunnelley, S. (2015). Personal support networks in practice and theory: Assessing the implications for supported decision-making law (Report commissioned by the Law Commission of Ontario). https://www.lco-cdo.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/capacity-guardianship-commissioned-paper-nunnelley.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pedlar, A., Haworth, L., Hutchison, P., Taylor, A., & Dunn, P. (1999). A textured life: Empowerment and adults with developmental disabilities. Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, H., & Bromley, J. (2012). Interviewing people with intellectual disabilities. In E. Emerson, C. Hatton, K. Dickson, A. Caine, & J. Bromley (Eds.), Clinical Psychology and people with intellectual disabilities (2nd ed.) (pp. 107–120). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, G. (2010). Personhood and legal capacity: Perspectives on the paradigm shift of article 12 CRPD [Presentation to HPOD Conference Harvard Law School]. http://www.nuigalway.ie/cdlp/documents/publications/Harvard Legal Capacity gq draft 2.doc
   Google Scholar
• Rathner, G. (1998). A plea against compulsory treatment of anorexia nervosa patients. In W. Vandereycken, & P. Beumont (Eds.), Treating eating Disorders: Ethical, legal and personal issues (Vol 1) (pp. 179–215). Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutman, D., & Taylor, J. (2009). Experiences of adults living with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder and their personal supporters in making and using a representation agreement: An analysis of representation agreements as a tool for supported decision-making for adults with FASD. http://www.nidus.ca/PDFs/Nidus_Research_RA_FASD_Project.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Salzman, L. (2010). Rethinking guardianship (again): Substituted decision-making as a violation of the integration mandate of title II of the Americans with disabilities Act. Cardozo legal studies research paper No 282. University of Colorado Law Review, 81, 157–245. http://lawreview.colorado.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/10Salzman-FINAL_s.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Savani, K., Markus, H. R., & Conner, A. L. (2008). Let your preference be your guide? Preferences and choices are more tightly linked for North Americans than for Indians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 861–876. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0011618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118–138). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Series, L. (2015). Relationships, autonomy and legal capacity: Mental capacity and support paradigms. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 40(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.04.010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shogren, K. A., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2015). A framework for research and intervention design in supported decision-making. Inclusion, 3(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-3.1.17
   Google Scholar
• Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Lassman, H., & Forber-Pratt, A. J. (2017). Supported decision making: A synthesis of the literature across intellectual disability, mental health and ageing. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52(2), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.2307/26420386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvers, A., & Francis, L. P. (2009). Thinking about the good: Reconfiguring liberal metaphysics (or not) for people with cognitive disabilities. Metaphilosophy, 40(3-4), 475–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01602.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, C., Gersbach, K., Hogan, M., Bucks, R. S., Auret, K. A., Clayton, J. M., Agar, M., & Kurrle, S. (2018). How couples with dementia experience healthcare, lifestyle, and everyday decision-making. International Psychogeriatrics, 30(11), 1639–1647. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610218000741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skowron, P. (2019). Giving substance to ‘the best interpretation of will and preferences’. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 62, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stainton, T. (2016). Supported decision-making in Canada: Principles, policy and practice. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/23297018.2015.1063447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szmukler, G. (2019). “Capacity”, “best interests”, “will and preferences” and the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. World Psychiatry, 18(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative methods: A guidebook and resource (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Then, S., Carney, T., Bigby, C., & Douglas, J. (2018). Supporting decision-making of adults with cognitive disabilities: The role of law reform agencies: Recommendations, rationales and influence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 61, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN Enable. (2006). Chapter Six: From provisions to practice: implementing the convention. Legal capacity and supported decision making. http://www.un.org/disabilities/ default.asp?id = 242 on 9 January 2013
   Google Scholar
• United Nations [UNCRPD]. (2006). The Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Vela Microboard Association. (1997). Microboards [brochure]. http://www.microboard.org/PDF/principles%20and%20functions.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. (2016). Assumptions of decision-making capacity: The role supporter attitudes play in the realisation of Article 12 for people with severe or profound intellectual disability. Laws, 5(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws5010006
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J., Voss, H., & Bloomer, M. J. (2019). Placing the preferences of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities at the center of end-of-life decision making through storytelling. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44(4), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919879701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E., & Hsee, C. (2000). Culture and individual judgment and decision making. Applied Psychology, 49(1), 32–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Women’s Research Centre. (1994). Microboards review: A report to Vela Housing Society. https://www.library.ubc.ca/archives/u_arch/womens.pdf
   Google Scholar