References
- Boersma, P., Weenink, D., 2004, PRAAT [Computer Software]. Amsterdam: Institute of Phonetics.
- Booth, J. R., Harasaki, Y., Burman, D. D.. 2006. Development of lexical and sentence level context effects for dominant and subordinate word meanings of homonyms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 35, 531–554.
- Catts, H. W.. 1993. The relationship between speech–language impairments and reading disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 36, 948–958.
- Colangelo, A., Buchanan, L.. 2005. Semantic ambiguity and the failure of inhibition hypothesis as an explanation for reading errors in deep dyslexia. Brain and Cognition. 57, 39–42.
- Eggen, T. J. H. M., Sanders, P. F., 1993, Psychometrie in de praktijk Arnhem: Cito.
- Elston-Güttler, K. E., Friederici, A. D.. 2005. Native and L2 processing of homonyms in sentential context. Journal of Memory and Language. 52, 256–283.
- Forster, K. I., Bednall, E. S.. 1976. Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access. Memory and Cognition. 4, 53–61.
- Hino, Y., Lupker, S. J.. 1996. Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22, 1331–1356.
- Jastrzembski, J. E.. 1981. Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology. 13, 278–305.
- Johnson, C. J., Ionson, M. E., Torreiter, S. M.. 1997. Assessing children's knowledge of multiple meaning words. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology. 1, 77–86.
- Klein, D. E., Murphy, G. L.. 2001. The representation of polysemous words. Journal of Memory and Language. 45, 259–282.
- Klepousniotou, E.. 2002. The processing of lexical ambiguity: homonymy and polysemy in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language. 81, 205–223.
- Klepousniotou, E., Baum, S. R.. 2005. Unilateral brain damage effects on processing homonymous and polysemous words. Brain and Language. 93, 308–326.
- Mason, J. M., Kniseley, E., Kendall, J.. 1979. Effects of polysemous words on sentence comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly. 1, 49–65.
- Menyuk, P., Chesnick, M., Weis Liebergott, J., Korngold, B., D'Agostino, R., Belanger, A.. 1991. Predicting reading problems in at risk children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 34, 893–903.
- Miller, G. A.. 1999. On knowing a word. Annual Review of Psychology. 50, 1–19.
- Nelson, J. R., Stage, S. A.. 2007. Fostering the development of vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension through contextually-based multiple meaning vocabulary instruction. Education and Treatment of Children. 30, 1–22.
- Nippold, M. A., Taylor, C. L.. 1995. Idiom understanding in youth: further examination of familiarity and transparency. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 38, 426–433.
- Nippold, M. A., Cuyler, J. C., Braunbeck-Price, R.. 1988. Explanation of Ambiguous Advertisements: A Developmental Study with Children and Adolescents. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 31, 466–474.
- Norbury, C. F.. 2005. Barking up the wrong tree? Lexical ambiguity resolution in children with language impairments and autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 90, 142–171.
- Petten, C., 2002, Lexical ambiguity resolutionEncyclopedia of Cognitive Science London: Macmillan867–872.
- Spector, C. C.. 1990. Linguistic humour comprehension of normal and language-impaired adolescents. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 55, 533–541.
- Sutter, J. C., Johnson, C. J.. 1990. School-age children's metalinguistic awareness of grammaticality in verb form. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 33, 84–95.
- Tranel, D., Martin, D., Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Hichwa, R.. 2005. Effects of noun–verb homonymy on the neural correlates of naming concrete entities and actions. Brain and Language. 92, 288–299.
- Wulfeck, B. B.. 1993. A reaction time study of grammaticality judgments in children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 36, 1208–1215.