460
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Reports

Randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of a telehealth treatment for chronic stuttering: the Camperdown Program

, , , , &
Pages 108-120 | Received 28 Apr 2008, Accepted 16 Jan 2009, Published online: 10 Dec 2009

References

  • Block, S., Onslow, M., Packman, A., Dakakis, G.. 2006. Connecting stuttering measurement and management: IV. Nonbehavioural predictors of treatment outcomes. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders. 41, 395–406.
  • Block, S., Onslow, M., Packman, A., Gray, B., Dakakis, G.. 2005. Treatment of chronic stuttering: Outcomes from a student training clinic. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders. 40, 455–466.
  • Boberg, E., 1981, Maintenance of Fluency New York, NY: Elsevier.
  • Boberg, E., Kully, D., 1985, Comprehensive Stuttering Treatment Program San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
  • Brennan, D. M., Georgeadis, M. S., Baron, C. R., Barker, L. M.. 2004. The effects of videoconference-based telerehabilitation on story retelling performance by brain-injured subjects and its implications for remote speech–language therapy. Telemedicine Journal of e-Health. 10, 147–154.
  • Craig, A. R., Calver, P.. 1991. Following up on treated stutterers: studies of perceptions of fluency and job status. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 34, 279–284.
  • Craig, J. J., McConville, J. P., Patterson, V. H., Wootton, R.. 1999. Neurological examination is possible using telemedicine. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 5, 177–181.
  • Doolittle, G. C., Allen, A.. 1997. Practising oncology via telemedicine. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 3, 63–70.
  • Elford, R., White, H., Bowering, R., Ghandi, A., Maddiggan, B., St. John, K., House, M., Harnett, J., West, R., Battcock, A.. 2000. A randomized, controlled trial of child psychiatric assessments conducted using videoconferencing. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 6, 73–82.
  • Fitch, J. L., Cross, S. T.. 1983. Telecomputer treatment for aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 48, 335–336.
  • Georgeadis, A. C., Brennan, D. M., Barker, L. M., Baron, C. R.. 2004. Telerehabilitation and its effects on story retelling by adults with neurogenic communication disorders. Aphasiology. 18, 639–652.
  • Goldiamond, I., 1965, Stuttering and fluency as manipulatable operant response classes. In L. Krasner, L. Ullmann (eds), Research in Behavior Modification New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 106–156.
  • Harrison, E., Onslow, M., Andrews, C., Packman, A., Webber, M., 1998, Control of stuttering with prolonged speech: development of a one-day instatement program. In A. K. Cordes, R. J. E. Ingham (eds), Treatment Efficacy in Stuttering San Diego, CA: Singular, 191–212.
  • Hassall, S., Wootton, R., Guilfoyle, C.. 2003. The cost of allied health assessments delivered by videoconference to a residential facility for elderly people. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 9, 234–237.
  • Hill, A. J., Theodoros, D. G., Russell, T. G., Cahill, L. M., Ward, E. C., Clark, K. M.. 2006. An internet-based telerehabilitation system for the assessment of motor speech disorders: a pilot study. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology. 15, 45–56.
  • Howie, P. M., Tanner, S., Andrews, G.. 1981. Short-term and long-term outcome in an intensive treatment program for adult stutterers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 46, 104–109.
  • Ingham, R., Andrews, G.. 1973. An analysis of a token economy in stuttering therapy. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis. 6, 219–229.
  • Ingham, R. J., 1984, Stuttering and Behavior Therapy: Current Status and Experimental Foundations San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
  • Ingham, R. J., Kilgo, M., Ingham, J. C., Moglia, R., Belknap, H., Sanchez, T.. 2001. Evaluation of a stuttering treatment based on reduction of short phonation intervals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 44, 1229–1244.
  • Jones, B., Jarvis, P., Lewis, J. A., Ebbutt, A. F.. 1996. Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods. British Medical Journal. 313, 36–39.
  • Jones, M., Onslow, M., Packman, A., Gebski, V.. 2006. Guidelines for statistical analysis of percentage of syllables stuttered data. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research. 49, 867–878.
  • Krumm, S., Tan, M., Shelton, B.. 2004. Nursing challenges in developing a satellite cancer clinical research program within a different healthcare system. Oncology Nursing Forum. 31, 441–442.
  • Kully, D.. 2000. Telehealth in speech pathology: applications to the treatment of stuttering. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 6, S39–S41.
  • Lalor, E., Brown, M., Cranfield, E.. 2000. Telemedicine: its role in speech and language management for rural and remote patients. ACQuiring Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing. 2, 54–55.
  • Langevin, M., Boberg, E.. 1993. Results of an intensive stuttering therapy program. Journal of Speech–Language Pathology and Audiology. 17, 158–166.
  • Langevin, M., Huinck, W. J., Kully, D., Peters, H. F., Lomheim, H., Tellers, M.. 2006. A cross-cultural, long-term outcome evaluation of the ISTAR Comprehensive Stuttering Program across Dutch and Canadian adults who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 31, 229–256.
  • Martin, R. R., Haroldson, S. K., Triden, K. A.. 1984. Stuttering and speech naturalness. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 49, 53–58.
  • Mashima, P. A., Birkmire-Peters, D. P., Syms, M. J., Holtel, M. R., Burgess, L. P. A., Peters, L. J.. 2003. Telehealth: voice therapy using telecommunications technology. American Journal of Speech- Language Pathology. 12, 432–439.
  • O'Brian, S., Onslow, M., Cream, A., Packman, A.. 2003. The Camperdown Program: outcomes of a new prolonged-speech treatment model. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research. 46, 933–946.
  • O'Brian, S., Packman, A., Onslow, M.. 2008. Telehealth delivery of the Camperdown Program for adults who stutter. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research. 51, 184–195.
  • O'Brian, S., Packman, A., Onslow, M.. Self-rating of stuttering severity as a clinical tool. American Journal of Speech—Language Pathology. 2004a; 15, 219–226.
  • O'Brian, S., Packman, A., Onslow, M., O'Brian, N.. Measurement of stuttering in adults: comparison of stuttering rate and severity scaling methods. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2004b; 47, 1081–1087.
  • Onslow, M., Jones, M., O'Brian, S., Menzies, R., Packman, A.. 2008. Defining, identifying, and evaluating clinical trials of stuttering treatments: a tutorial. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology. 17, 401–415.
  • Onslow, M., O'Brian, S., Packman, A., Rousseau, I., 2004, Long term follow up of speech outcomes for a prolonged-speech treatment for stuttering: the effects of paradox on stuttering treatment research. In A. K. Bothe (ed.), Evidence-based Treatment of Stuttering: Empirical Issues and Clinical Implications Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 231–244.
  • Palsbo, S. E.. 2007. Equivalence of functional communication assessment in speech pathology using videoconferencing. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 13, 40–43.
  • Perkins, W. H., Rudas, J., Johnson, L., Michael, W. B., Curlee, R. F.. 1974. Replacement of stuttering with normal Speech. 3. Clinical effectiveness. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 39, 416–428.
  • Piaggio, G., Elbourne, D. R., Altman, D. G., Pocock, S. J., Evans, S. J. W.. 2006. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials. Journal of the American Medical Association. 295, 1152–1842.
  • Pickering, M., McAllister, L., Hagler, P., Whitehill, T. L., Penn, C., Robertson, S. J., McCready, V.. 1998. External factors influencing the profession in six societies. American Journal of Speech- Language Pathology. 7, 5–17.
  • Project for Rural Health Communications and Information Technology, 1996, Telehealth in Rural and Remote Australia Moe, VIC: Australian Rural Health Research Institute, Monash University.
  • Rousseau, I., Packman, A., Onslow, M., Dredge, R., Harrison, E.. 2002. Australian speech pathologists' use of the Lidcombe program of early stuttering intervention. ACQuiring Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing. 4, 67–71.
  • Schopp, L., Johnstone, B., Merrell, D.. 2000. Telehealth and neuropsychological assessment: new opportunities for psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 31, 179–183.
  • Silverman, F. H., Paynter, K. K.. 1990. Impact of stuttering on perception of occupational competence. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 15, 87–91.
  • Theodoros, D. G., Constantinescu, G., Russell, T. G., Ward, E. C., Wilson, S. J., Wootton, R.. 2006. Treating the speech disorder in Parkinson's disease online. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 12 Suppl. 3: S3,88–91.
  • Vickers, A. J., Altman, D. G.. 2001. Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. British Medical Journal. 323, 1123–1124.
  • Wertz, R. T., Dronkers, N. F., Bernstein-Ellis, E., Sterling, L. K., Shubitowski, Y., Elman, R., Shenaut, G. K., Knight, R. T., Deal, J. L.. 1992. Potential of telephonic and television technology for appraising and diagnosing neurogenic communication disorders in remote settings. Aphasiology. 6, 195–202.
  • Wiens, B. L., Zhao, W.. 2007. The role of intention to treat in analysis of noninferiority studies. Clinical Trials. 4, 286–291.
  • Wilkie, T., Beilby, J.. 1996. Post-treatment stuttering severity under different assessment conditions. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders. 24, 19–27.
  • Wilson, L., Lincoln, M., Onslow, M.. 2002. Availability, access, and quality of care: inequities in rural speech pathology services and a model for redress. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology. 4, 9–22.
  • Wilson, L., Onslow, M., Lincoln, M.. 2004. Telehealth adaptation of the Lidcombe program of early stuttering intervention: five case studies. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 13, 81–93.
  • Wootton, R., Bloomer, S. E., Corbett, R., Eedy, D. J., Hicks, N., Lotery, H. E., Mathews, C., Paisley, J., Steele, K., Loane, M. A.. 2000. Multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing real time teledermatology with conventional outpatient dermatological care: societal cost–benefit analysis. British Medical Journal. 320, 1252–1256.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.