Dying at home or in the hospital? An observational study in German general practice

References

• Gomes B, Calanzani N, Gysels M, et al. Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: A systematic review. BMC Palliat Care. 2013;12:7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginson IJ, Sarmento VP, Calanzani N, et al. Dying at home—is it better: A narrative appraisal of the state of the science. Palliat Med. 2013;27:918–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang ST. When death is imminent: Where terminally ill patients with cancer prefer to die and why. Cancer Nurs. 2003;26:245–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar Pinzon LC, Claus M, Zepf KI, et al. Dying in Rhineland-Palatinate (Germany): Preferred and actual place of death. Gesundheitswesen. 2013;75:853–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Roo ML, Miccinesi G, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, et al. Actual and preferred place of death of home-dwelling patients in four European countries: Making sense of quality indicators. PLoS One. 2014;9:e93762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loucka M, Payne SA, Brearley SG. Place of death in the Czech Republic and Slovakia: A population based comparative study using death certificates data. BMC Palliat Care. 2014;13:13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Houttekier D, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, et al. Which patients with cancer die at home? A study of six European countries using death certificate data. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2267–2273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aabom B, Kragstrup J, Vondeling H, et al. Population-based study of place of death of patients with cancer: Implications for GPs. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55:684–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaraman J, Joseph K. Determinants of place of death: A population-based retrospective cohort study. BMC Palliat Care. 2013;12:19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rensbergen G, Nawrot TS, van Hecke E, et al. Where do the elderly die? The impact of nursing home utilisation on the place of death. Observations from a mortality cohort study in Flanders. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagyor I, Luthke A, Jansky M, et al. End of life care in general practice: Results of an observational survey with general practitioners. Schmerz. 2013;27:289–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider N, Mitchell GK, Murray SA. Palliative care in urgent need of recognition and development in general practice: The example of Germany. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busse R, Blümel M. Germany: Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2014;16:1–296, xxi.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Voigtländer S, Deiters T. Minimum standards for the spatial accessibility of primary care: A systematic review. Gesundheitswesen. 2015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WIdO [Internet]. Germany: Scientific institute of the German local health care fund [cited 2015 Jul 29]. Available from: http://www.wido.de/fileadmin/wido/downloads/pdf_ggw/wido_ggw_aufs2_1008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thonnes M, Jakoby NR. Where do people die?: On the question of dying in institutions. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;44:336–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessen SJ, Francke AL, Echteld MA, et al. GPs’ recognition of death in the foreseeable future and diagnosis of a fatal condition: A national survey. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesärztekammer. Empfehlungen der Bundesärztekammer und der Zentralen Ethikkommission bei der Bundesärztekammer Umgang mit Vorsorgevollmacht und Patientenverfügung in der ärztlichen Praxis. Dtsch Arztebl 2013;110:A1580–A1585.
   Google Scholar
• Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA. Karnofsky performance status revisited: Reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 1984;2:187–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abernethy AP, Shelby-James T, Fazekas BS, et al. The Australia-modified Karnofsky performance status (AKPS) scale: A revised scale for contemporary palliative care clinical practice ISRCTN81117481. BMC Palliat Care. 2005;4:7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peus D, Newcomb N, Hofer S. Appraisal of the Karnofsky performance status and proposal of a simple algorithmic system for its evaluation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnell S, Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, et al. The 1-year mortality of patients treated in a hip fracture program for elders. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2010;1:6–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stokes ME, Davis C, Koch G. Categorical data analysis using SAS. 3rd ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes B, Higginson IJ, Calanzani N, et al. Preferences for place of death if faced with advanced cancer: A population survey in England, Flanders, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2006–2015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura S, Kuzuya M, Funaki Y, et al. Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill cancer patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2010;10:154–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stajduhar KI, Davies B. Variations in and factors influencing family members’ decisions for palliative home care. Palliat Med. 2005;19:21–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratner E, Norlander L, McSteen K. Death at home following a targeted advance-care planning process at home: The kitchen table discussion. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:778–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel J, Pring A, Rich A, et al. The impact of advance care planning of place of death, a hospice retrospective cohortstudy. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2013;3:168–173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joyce BT, Berman R, Lau DT. Formal and informal support of family caregivers managing medications for patients who receive end-of-life care at home: A cross-sectional survey of caregivers. Palliat Med. 2014;28:1146–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candy B, Jones L, Drake R, et al. Interventions for supporting informal caregivers of patients in the terminal phase of a disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;CD007617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gesetz über die Pflegezeit (Pflegezeitgesetz-PflegeZG) [Internet]. Germany: PflegeZG; 2008 [cited 2015 Jul 29]. Available from: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bundesrecht/pflegezg/gesamt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bundesregierung [Internet]. Germay: Entwicklung und Inanspruchnahme der Pflegezeit nach dem Pflegezeitgesetz Anfrage; 2010 [cited 2015 Jul 29]. Available from: http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/17/041/1704135.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pleschberger S. Palliative care in nursing homes: Central issues and further research. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2006;39:376–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer S, Marckmann G, Pentzek M, et al. Advance directives in nursing homes: Prevalence, validity, significance, and nursing staff adherence. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109:577–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandervoort A, Van den Block L, van der Steen J T, et al. Advance directives and physicians’ orders in nursing home residents with dementia in Flanders, Belgium: Prevalence and associated outcomes. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24:1133–1143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egidi G, Abholz H, in der Schmitten J. Patientenverfügungen als IGeL-Leistung oder als Teil Hausärztlicher Versorgung? Z Allg Med. 2012;88:87–93.
   Google Scholar
• Spence D. The dying deserve better from GPs. Br Med J. 2013;347:f4595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanratty B, Lowson E, Holmes L, et al. A comparison of strategies to recruit older patients and carers to end-of-life research in primary care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummers-Pradier E, Scheidt-Nave C, Martin H, et al. Simply no time? Barriers to GPs’ participation in primary health care research. Fam Pract. 2008;25:105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar