References
- Brownell H H, Potter H H, Bihrle A M, Gardner H. Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients. Brain Lang 1986; 27: 310–321
- Brådvik B, Dravins C, Hollås S, Rosán I, Ryding E, Ingvar D H. Disturbances of speech prosody following right hemisphere infarcts. Acta Neurol Scand 1991; 84: 114–126
- Foldi N S. Appreciation of pragmatic interpretations of indirect commands: Comparison of right and left hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain Lang 1987; 31: 88–108
- Kaplan J A, Brownell H H, Jacobs J R, Gardner H. The effects of right hemisphere damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks. Brain Lang 1990; 38: 315–333
- Oldfield R C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologja 1971; 9: 97–113
- Ross E D. The aprosodias. Functional-anatomic organization of affective components of language in the right hemisphere. Arch Neurol 1981; 38: 561–569
- Ross E D, Mesulam M M. Dominant language functions of the right hemisphere: prosody and emotional gesturing. Arch Neurol 1979; 36: 144–148
- Ross E D, Harney J H, deLacoste-Utamsing C, Purdy P D. How the brain integrates affective and propositional language into a unified behavioral function — Hypothesis based on clinicoanatomic evidence. Arch Neurol 1981; 38: 745–748
- Van Lancker D R, Kempler D. Comprehension of familiar phrases by left — but not by right hemisphere damaged patients. Brain Lang 1987; 32: 265–277
- Wapner W, Hamby S, Gardner H. The role of the right hemisphere in the apprehension of complex linguistic materials. Brain Lang 1981; 14: 15–33
- Winner E, Gardner H. The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients. Brain 1977; 100: 717–729