OPCAB surgery is cost-effective for elderly patients

References

• Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics–2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125:e2–e220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk D, Spoor M, Hijman R, Nathoe HM, Borst C, Jansen EW, et al. Cognitive and cardiac outcomes 5 years after off-pump vs on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 2007;297:701–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelini GD, Taylor FC, Reeves BC. Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2002;359:1194–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czerny M, Baumer H, Kilo J, Zuckermann A, Grubhofer G, Chevtchik O, et al. Complete Revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:165–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Légaré J-F, Buth KJ, King S, Wood J, Sullivan JA, Hancock Friesen C, et al. Coronary bypass surgery performed off pump does not result in lower in-hospital morbidity than coronary artery bypass grafting performed on pump. Circulation. 2004;109:887–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingaas PS, Hol PK, Lundblad R, Rein KA, Vatne K, Smith HJ, et al. Clinical and angiographic outcome of coronary surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective randomized trial. Heart Surg Forum. 2004;7:37–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, Huber PR, Block PC, Duke PG, et al. Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1 year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes. A randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;291:1841–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straka Z, Widimsky P, Jirasek K, Stros P, Votava J, Vanek T, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary surgery: final results from a prospective randomized study PRAGUE-4. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:789–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, Collins JF, McDonald GO, Kozora E, et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1827–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlind K, Kjeldsen BJ, Madsen SN, Rasmussen BS, Holme SJ, Nielsen PH, et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in elderly patients. Results from the Danish on-pump vs. off-pump randomization study (DOORS). Circulation. 2012;125:2431–9.
   Google Scholar
• Møller CH, Perko MJ, Lund JT, Andersen LW, Kelbaek H, Madsen JK, et al. No major differences in 30-day outcomes in high-risk patients randomized to off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery. The best bypass surgery trial. Circulation. 2010;121:498–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathoe HM, Dijk D, Jansen EWL, Suyker WJ, Diephuis JC, van Boven WJ, et al. A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:394–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Ruzzeh S, Epstein D, George S, Bustami M, Ilsley C, Sculpher M, et al. Economic evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass: cost-effectiveness and quality-adjusted life years in a randomized controlled trial. Artif Organs. 2008;32:891–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ascoine R, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, Lotto AA, Pitsis AA, Angelini GD. Economic outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:2237–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JD, Lee SJ, Tsushima WT, Yamauchi H, Lau W, Popper J, et al. Benefits of off-pump bypass on neurologic and clinical morbidity: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:18–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlind K, Kjeldsen BJ, Madsen SN, Rasmussen BS, Holme SJ, Schmidt TA, et al. The impact of avoiding cardiopulmonary by-pass during coronary artery bypass surgery in elderly patients: the Danish On-pump Off-pump Randomisation Study (DOORS). Trials. 2009;10:47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ankjaer-Jensen A, Rosling P, Bilde L. Variable prospective financing in the Danish hospital sector and the development of a Danish case-mix system. Health Care Manag Sci. 2006;9:259–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wittrup-Jensen K, Lauridsen JT, Gudex C, Pedersen KM. Generation of a Danish TTO value set for EQ-5D health states. Scand J Public Health. 2009;37:459–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond MF, Schulper MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien B, Stoddart GL. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Manca A, Hawkins N, Schulper MJ. Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility. Health Econ. 2005;14:487–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin N, Parkin D. Does nice have a cost effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? Health Econ. 2004;13:437–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja SG, Haider Z, Ahmad M. Predictors of gastrointestinal complications after conventional and beating heart coronary surgery. Surgeon. 2003;1:221–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng DC, Bainbridge D, Martin JE, Novick RJ. The evidence-based perioperative clinical outcomes research group. Does Off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with conventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:188–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar