Late Thrombotic Malfunction of the Björk–Shiley Tilting Disc Valve in the Tricuspid Position. Principles for Recognition and Management

References

• Assad-Morell J. L., Tajik A. J., Anderson M. W., Tancredi R. G., Wallace R. B., Giuliani E. R. Malfunctioning tricuspid valve prosthesis. Mayo Clin Proc 1974; 49: 443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azpitarte J., de Vega N. G., Santalla A., Rábago P., Rábago G. Thrombotic obstruction of Björk–Shiley tricuspid valve prosthesis. Acta Cardio 1975; 30: 419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baille Y., Choffel J., Sicard M. P., Malmejac Cl., Metras D., Delaye A., Manuel C., Houel J. Traitement thrombolytique des thromboses de prothèse valvulaire. Nouv Press Med 1974; 3: 1233
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barnard C. N., Schrire V., Frater R. W. M., Goosen C. C. Further experience with the U.C.T. mitral, tricuspid and aortic prosthesis. Surgery 1965; 57: 211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björk V. O. The pyrolytic carbon occluder for the Björk–Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis. Scand J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 1972; 6: 109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Björk V. O. The improved Björk–Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis. Scand J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 1978; 12: 81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björk V. O., Henze A. Management of throm-bo-embolism after aortic valve replacement with the Björk–Shiley tilting disc valve. Scand J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 1975; 9: 183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björk V. O., Henze A., Hindmarsch T. Radiopaque marker in the tilting disc of the Björk–Shiley heart valve: Evaluation of in vivo prosthetic valve function by cineangiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1977; 73: 563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björk V. O., Henze A. Prosthetic heart valve replacement. Nine years' experience with the Björk–Shiley tilting disc valve. Tissue heart valves, M. I. Ionescu. Butterworths, London and Boston 1979; 1
   Google Scholar
• Bourdillon P. D. V., Sharatt G. P. Malfunction of Björk–Shiley valve prosthesis in tricuspid position. Brit Heart J 1976; 38: 1149
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calvo G., Veyrat C., Witchitz S. Dysfonction-nement d'une valve de Starr aortique. Guérison sous urokinase. Gaz Med Fr 1975; 82: 4187
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier A., Deloche A., Relland J., Fabiani J. N., Forman J., Camilleri J. P., Soyer R., Dubost Ch. Six-year follow up of glutaraldehyde-preserved heterografts. J Thorax Cardiovasc Surg 1974; 68: 771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischbacher W. Beitrag zur fibrinolytischen Therapie mit Streptokinase und Fibrinolysis. Thromb Diath Haemat 1961; 6: 457
   Google Scholar
• Florent J. M. J., Jaumin P., Piette F., Kremer R. Ouverture d'un foramen ovale secondaire au blocage d'une prothèse à disque en position tricus-pidienne. Arch Mal Coeur 1977; 70: 291
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forbes C. D., Prentice C. R. Thrombus formation and artificial furfaces. Brit Med Bull 1978; 34: 201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henze A., Carlsson S., Björk V. O. Mortality and pathology following aortic valve replacement with the Björk–Shiley tilting disc valve. Scand J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 1973; 7: 7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Inberg M. V., Havia T., Arstila M. Thrombolytic treatment for thrombotic complication of valve prosthesis after tricuspid valve replacement. Scand J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 1977; 11: 195
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landou C., Hindmarsh T. Radiological examination of the Björk–Shiley prosthesis. Paper read at the annual meeting of the Swedish Society of Medical Radiology. 1974
   Google Scholar
• Luluaga I. T., Carrera D., D'Oliviera C., Cantaluppi C. G., Santin H., Molteni L., Ferreira R., Zwolinski E., De Luluaga I. I. Successful thrombolytic therapy after acute tricuspid valve obstruction. Lancet 1971; 1: 1067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh C. L., Michaelis L. L., Morrow A. G., Itscoitz S. B., Redwood D. R., Epstein S. E. Atrioventricular valve replacement with the Hancock porcine endograft: A five year clinical experience. Surgery 1975; 78: 768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Cabral R. J., McNamara J. J., Mamiya R. T., Brainard S. C., Chung G. K. T. Acute thrombotic obstruction with Björk–Shiley valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1978; 75: 321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owren P. A. A new method for controling anticoagulant therapy. Lancet 1959; 2: 754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquet E., Blanchette J., Desaulniers D., Després J. P., Lemieux M. Value of a cinefluoroscopic assessment of the Lillehei-Kaster prosthetic heart valves. Cardiovasc Radiol 1978; 1: 229
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Péterffy A., Henze A., Johansson R., Björk V. O. Clinical evaluation of the Björk–Shiley tilting disc valve in the tricuspid position. Scand J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 1978; 13: 179
   Google Scholar
• Proctor R. R., Rapaport S. I. The partial thromboplastin time with kaolin. Amer J Clin Pathol 1961; 36: 212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raj M. V. J., Srinivas V., Evans D. W. Thrombotic jamming of a tricuspid prosthesis. Brit Heart J 1976; 38: 1355
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schoevaerdts J.-C., Jaumin P., Piret L., Kremer R., Ponlot R., Chalant Ch.-H. Tricuspid valve surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg 1977; 18: 397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwansirikul S., Glassman E., Raia F., Spencer F. C. Late thrombosis of Starr-Edwards tricuspid ball valve prosthesis. Amer J Cardiol 1974; 34: 737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Veer J. B., Rhyneer G. S., Hodam R. P., Kloster F. E. Obstruction of tricuspid ball-valve prostheses. Circulation 1971; 43–44(Suppl. 1)I–62
   Google Scholar
• Witchitz S., Veyrat C., Moisson P., Kalmanson D., Chiche P. Thromboses tardives des prothèses valvulaires mitrales et tricuspidiennes diagnostic phonomécanographique et traitement. Ann Cardiol Angéiol 1974; 23: 399
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoganathan A. P., Corcoran W. H., Harrison E. C., Carl J. R. The Björk–Shiley aortic prosthesis flow characteristics, thrombus formation and tissue overgrowth. Circulation 1978; 58: 70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åberg B., Henze A. Comparison between the in vitro flow dynamics of the standard and the convexo-concave Björk–Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1979; 13: 177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar