References
- Björk V O. A new tilting disc valve prothesis. Scand J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 1969; 3: 1–10
- Björk V O, Henze A, Rodriquez L. Left ventricular rupture as a complication of mitral valve replacement: Surgical experience with eight cases and a review of the literature. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1977; 73: 14–22
- Björk V O, Henze A. Isolated mitral valve replacement with the Björk–Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis. Scand J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 1977; 11: 181–185
- Böök K. Mitral valve replacement with the Björk–Shiley tilting disc valve. Scand J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 1974, Suppl 12
- Cohn L H, Allred E N, Cohn L A, Austin J C, Sabik J, DiSesa V J, Shemin R J, Collins J J. Early and late risk of mitral valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 90: 872–881
- Davila J C, Magilligan D J, Lewis J W. Is the Hancock porcine valve the best cardiac valve substitute today. Ann Thorac Surg 1978; 26: 303–316
- Egloff L, Rothlin M, Turina M, Krayenbühl C H, Kugelmeier J, Senning Å. Isolated mitral valve replacement with the Björk–Shiley tilting disc prosthesis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surgeon 1979; 27: 223–226
- Gallo J I, Ruiz B, Carrion M F, Gutierrez J A, Vega J L, Duran C MG. Heart valve replacement with the Hancock bioprosthesis: A 6-year review. Ann Thorac Surg 1981; 31: 444–449
- Gosalbez F, de Linera F A, Cofiño J L, Naya J L, Rodriquez J, Ortuña A. Isolated mitral valve replacement and ventricular rupture: Presentation of 6 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1981; 31: 105–110
- Harjula A, Mattila S, Maamies T, Mattila I, Mattila P, Skyttä J, Tala P. Long-term follow-up of Björk–Shiley mitral valve replacement: 10 year's experience. Scand J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 1986; 20: 79–84
- Horskotte D, Haerten K, Seipel L, Körfer R, Budde T, Bircks W, Loogen F. Central hemodynamics at rest and during exercise after mitral valve replacement with different prostheses. Circulation 1983; 68(Suppl II)161–168
- Horskotte D, Körfer R, Seipel L, Bircks W, Loogen F. Late complications in patients with Björk–Shiley and St. Jude Medical heart valve replacement. Circulation 1983; 68(Suppl II)175–184
- Karp R B, Cyrus R J, Blackstone E H, Kirklin J W, Kouchoukos N T, Pacifico A D. The Björk–Shiley valve: Intermediate-term follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981; 81: 602–614
- Katske G, Golding L, Tubbs R, Loop F D. Posterior midventricular rupture after mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1979; 27: 130–132
- Lepley D, Jr, Flemma R J, Mullen D C, Motl M, Anderson A J, Weirauch E. Long-term follow-up of the Björk–Shiley prosthetic valve used in the mitral position. Ann Thorac Surg 1980; 30: 164–172
- Miller D C, Oyer P E, Stinson E B, Reitz B A, Jamieson S W, Baumgartner W A, Mitchell R S, Shumway N E. Ten to fifteen year reassessment of the performance characteristics of the Starr-Edwards Model 6120 mitral valve prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983; 85: 1–20
- Miller D W, Jr, Johnson D W, Ivey T D. Does preservation of the posterior chordae tendineae enhance survival during mitral valve replacement?. Ann Thorac Surg 1979; 28: 22–27
- Montero C G, Tellez G, Burgos R, Rufilanchas J J, Agosti J, Juffe A, Figuera D. Dysfunction of the Björk–Shiley prosthesis: Report of 32 cases. Scand J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 16: 9–15
- Morgan R J, Davis J T, Fraker T D. Current status of valve prostheses. Surg Clin N A 1985; 65: 699–720
- Murphy D A, Levine F H, Buckley M J, Swinski L, Dagget W M, Akins C W, Austen W G. Mechanical valves: A comparative analysis of the Starr-Edwards and Björk–Shiley prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 86: 746–752
- Perier P, Deloche A, Chauvaud S, Fabiani J N, Rossant P, Bessou J P, Relland J, Bourezak H, Gomez F, Blondeau P, D'Allaines C, Carpentier A. Comparative evaluation of mitral valve repair and replacement with Starr, Björk and porcine valve prostheses. Circulation 1984; 70(Suppl I)187–192
- Stinson E B, Griepp R B, Oyer P E, Shumway N E. Long-term experience with porcine aortic valve xenografts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1977; 73: 54–63