7
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Cardiac Pathology After Isolated Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in Relation to Preoperative Patient Status: Early and Late Autopsy Findings

&
Pages 263-270 | Accepted 18 Jan 1989, Published online: 12 Jul 2009

References

  • Anversa P, Ricci R. Quantitative structural analysis of the myocardium during physiologic growth and induced cardiac hypertrophy: a review. J Am Col Cardiol 1986; 7: 140–149
  • Bretschneider H J, Hübern G, Knoll D, Lohr B, Nordbeck H, Spieckermann P G. Myocardial resistance and tolerance to ischemia: physiological and biochemical basis. J Cardiovasc Surg 1975; 16: 241–260
  • Buckberg G, Eber L, Herman M, Gorlin R. Ischemia in aortic stenosis: hemodynamic prediction. Am J Cardiol 1975; 35: 778–784
  • Casale P N, Devereux R B, Alonso D R, Campo E, Kligfield P. Improved sex-specific criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy for clinical computer interpretation of electrocardiograms: validation with autopsy findings. Circulation 1987; 75: 565–572
  • BMDP statistical software, W J Dixon, M B Brown, L Engelman, et al. University of California Press, Berkeley 1983
  • Gaasch W H. Left ventricular radius to wall thickness ratio. Am J Cardiol 1979; 43: 1189–1194
  • Lund O. Determinants of long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a 10–17 year follow-up. Tex Heart Inst J 1987; 14: 144–153
  • Lund O. Prediction of long-term complications associated with aortic valve prostheses: a 10–17 year follow-up. Scand J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 1988; 22: 35–41
  • Lund O, Jensen F T. Functional status and left ventricular performance late after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Relation to preoperative data. Eur Heart J 1988; 9: 1234–1243
  • Lund O, Véth M. Prediction of late results following valve replacement in aortic valve stenosis. Seventeen years of follow-up examined with the Cox regression analysis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surgeon 1987; 35: 295–303
  • Maron B J, Ferrans V J, Roberts W C. Myocardial ultrastructure in patients with chronic aortic valve disease. Am J Cardiol 1975; 35: 725–739
  • Olsen E GJ. The pathology of the heart2nd ed. The Macmillan Press, London 1980
  • Pantely G, Morton M, Rahimtoola S H. Effects of successful, uncomplicated valve replacement on ventricular hypertrophy, volume, and performance in aortic stenosis and in aortic incompetence. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1978; 75: 383–391
  • Pyle R B, Mayer J E, Lindsay W G, Jorgensen C R, Wang Y, Nicoloff D M. Hemodynamic evaluation of Lillehei-Kaster and Starr-Edwards prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 1978; 26: 336–343
  • Rackley C E, Edwards J E, Wallace R B, Katz N M. Aortic valve disease. The heart, arteries, and veins6th ed., J W Hurst, R B Logue, C E Rackley, et al. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York 1986; 729–754
  • Reichenbach D D, Kennedy J W, Yang J PS, Benditt E P. Correlation of a histological evaluation of myocardial fibrosis with left ventricular function. Circulation 1967; 35/36(suppl II)219
  • Roberts W C, Bulkley B H, Morrow A G. Pathologic anatomy of cardiac valve replacement. Progr Cardiovasc Dis 1973; 15: 539–587
  • Romhilt D W, Estes E H. A point-score system for the ECG diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J 1968; 75: 752–758
  • Schaper J, Scheld H H, Schmidt U, Hehrlein F. Ultrastructural study comparing the efficacy of five different methods of intraoperative myocardial protection in the human heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986; 92: 47–55
  • Schnabel P A, Gebhard M M, Pomykaj T, et al. Myocardial protection: left ventricular ultrastructure after different forms of cardiac arrest. Thorac Cardiovasc Surgeon 1987; 35: 148–156
  • Vincent W R, Buckberg G D, Hoffman I E. Left ventricular subendocardial ischemia in severe valvar and supravalvar aortic stenosis: a common mechanism. Circulation 1974; 44: 326–333
  • Wigle E D. Myocardial fibrosis and calcareous emboli in valvular heart disease. Br Heart J 1957; 19: 539–549
  • Wikman-Coffelt J, Parmley W W, Mason D T. The cardiac hypertrophy process. Analysis of factors determining pathological vs. physiological development. Circ Res 1979; 4: 697–707

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.