Investigating the Interobserver Reliability of a Direct Observational Language Assessment Technique

References

• Bach K., Harnish R. H. Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, MA MIT Press. 1979
   Google Scholar
• Brinton B., Craig H. K., Skarakis-Doyle E. Peer commentary on clinical pragmatics: Expectations and realisations. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology 1990; 14: 7–12
   Google Scholar
• Brookshire R. H., Nicholas L. S., Krueger K. M., Redmond K. J. The clinical interaction analysis system: A system for observational recording of aphasia treatment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1978; 43: 437–447
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheng L.-R. L. The identification of communicative disorders in Asian-Pacific students. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders 1990; 13: 113–119
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham T. R., Tharp R. G. The influence of setting on accuracy and reliability of behavioural observation. Behavioural Assessment 1981; 3: 67–78
   Google Scholar
• Damico J. S. The effectiveness of direct observation as a language assessment technique. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque 1985a
   Google Scholar
• Damico J. S. Clinical discourse analysis: A functional language assessment technique. Communication skills and classroom success: Assessment of language learning disabled students, C. S. Simon. College-Hill Press, San Diego, CA 1985b; 165–204
   Google Scholar
• Damico J. S. Getting a fix on description. Best Practices in School Speech Language Pathology 1992a; 2: vii–viii
   Google Scholar
• Damico J. S. Systematic observation of communicative interaction: A valid and practical descriptive assessment technique. Best Practices in School Speech-Language Pathology 1992b; 2: 133–144
   Google Scholar
• Damico J. S. Establishing expertise in communicative disorders: Implications for the speech-language pathologist. Language Interaction in Clinical and Educational Settings, D. Kovarsky, M. Maxwell, J. Damico. ASH A Monographs 30, 1993a; 92–98
   Google Scholar
• Damico J. S. Language assessment in the adolescent student: Addressing critical concerns. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1993b; 24: 29–35
   Google Scholar
• Damico J. S., Oller J. W. Pragmatic versus morphological/syntactic criteria for language referrals. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1980; 11: 8594
   Google Scholar
• Damico J. S., Oller J. W., Jr. Spotting language problems. Los Amigos Research Associates, San Diego, CA 1985
   Google Scholar
• Damico J. S., Oller J. W., Storey M. E. The diagnosis of language disorders in bilingual children: Pragmatic and surface-oriented criteria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1983; 48: 285–294
   Google Scholar
• Damico J. S., Secord W. A., Wiig E. H. Descriptive language assessment at school: Characteristics and design. Best Practices in School Speech-Language Pathology 1992; 2: 1–9
   Google Scholar
• Egolf D. B., Chester S. L. Nonverbal communication and the disorders of speech and language. Asha 1973; 15: 511–518
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flanders N. A. Estimating reliability. Interaction analysis: Theory and research application, E. J. Amidon, J. B. Hough. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 1967; 76–83
   Google Scholar
• Foster S. L., Cone J. D. Current issues in direct observation. Behavioural Observation 1980; 2: 313–338
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann D. P. Considerations in the choice of interobserver reliability of interval data. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 1977; 10: 103–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins R. P. Who decided that was the problem? Two stages of responsibility for applied behaviour analysis. Issues in evaluating behaviour modification, W. S. Wood. Research Press, Champaign, IL 1975; 102–121
   Google Scholar
• Haynes S. N., Horn W. F. Reactivity in behavioural observation: A review. Behavioural Assessment 1982; 4: 369–385
   Google Scholar
• We D. E., Wiersma W., Jurs S. G. Applied statistics for the behavioural sciences. Houghton Mifflin, Boston 1979
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson T. A. What to look for in the technical manual: Twenty questions for users. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1996; 27: 109–121
   Google Scholar
• Kaderavek J. N., Sulzby E. Parent-child joint book reading: An observational protocol for young children. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1998; 7: 33–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovarsky D. Ethnography and language assessment: Toward the contextualised description and interpretation of communicative behaviour. Best Practices in School Speech-Language Pathology 1992; 2: 115–122
   Google Scholar
• Larson V., McKinley N. Language disorders in older students. Thinking Publications, Eau Claire, WI 1995
   Google Scholar
• Long M. H. Inside the “Black Box”: Methodological issues in classroom research on language learning. Language Learning 1980; 30: 1–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McTear M., Conti-Ramsden G. Pragmatic disability in children. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, CA 1992
   Google Scholar
• Mash E. J., McElwee J. D. Situational effects on observer accuracy: Behavioural predictability, prior experience, and complexity of coding categories. Child Development 1974; 45: 446–455
   Google Scholar
• Mash E. J., Terdal L. G. Behaviour therapy assessment: Diagnosis, design, and evaluation. Psychological Reports 1974; 35: 587–601
   Google Scholar
• Masling J., Stern G. Effect of the observer in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology 1969; 60: 351–354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson N. W. Childhood language disorders in context: Infancy through adolescence. Macmillan College Publishing, New York 1993
   Google Scholar
• Norris J. Expanding language norms for school-age children and adolescents: Is it pragmatic?. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 1995; 26: 342–352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oller J. W., Jr. Language tests at school: A pragmatic approach. Longman, London 1979
   Google Scholar
• Oller J. W., Jr. Language testing research Lessons applied to LEP students and programs. Proceedings of the Second National Research Symposium on Limited English Proficient Student Issues: Focus on evaluation and measurement. United States Department of Education, Washingon, DC 1992; 2: 43–123
   Google Scholar
• Paul R. Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: Assessment and intervention. Mosby-Year Book, St Louis, MO 1995
   Google Scholar
• Plante E. Observing and interpreting behaviours: An introduction to the clinical forum. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1996; 27: 99–101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pils L. Soon anofe you tout me: Evaluation in a first-grade whole language classroom. The Reading Teacher 1991; 45: 46–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice M. L., Sell M. A., Hadley P. A. The Social Interactive Coding System (SICS): An online, clinically relevant descriptive tool. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1990; 21: 2–14
   Google Scholar
• Rosenshine B., Furst N. The use of direct observation to study teaching. Second handbook of research on teaching, R. Travers. Rand, Chicago 1973; 43–79
   Google Scholar
• Rowley G. L. The reliability of observational measures. American Educational Research Journal 1976; 13: 51–59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secord W., Wiig E., Damico J., Goodwin G. Classroom communication assessment: Evaluating performance in context. Riverside Publishing Co., Chicago, IL 1994
   Google Scholar
• Seliger H. W. Testing authentic language: The problem of meaning. Language Testing 1982; 2: 60–73
   Google Scholar
• Semel E., Wiig E., Secord W. CELF Observational Rating Scales. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX 1996
   Google Scholar
• Shepard L. A. Why we need better assessments. Educational Leadership 1989; 46(6)49
   Google Scholar
• Silliman E. R., Wilkinson L. C. Observation is more than looking. Language learning disabilities in school-age children and adolescents: Some principles and applications, G. P. Wallach, K. G. Butler. Merrill Publishing, New York 1994; 145–174
   Google Scholar
• Starkweather C. W. Disorders of nonverbal communication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1977; 42: 535–546
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wahler R. G., Fox J. J. Setting events in applied behaviour analysis: Toward a conceptual and methodological expansion. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 1981; 14: 327–338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westby C., Erickson J. Prologue. Topics in Language Disorders 1992; 22(6)v–viii
   Google Scholar
• Westby C. E., Stevens-Dominguez M., Oetter P. A performance/competence model of observational assessment. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 1996; 27: 144–156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins G. P. Assessing student performance. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 1993
   Google Scholar
• Wiig E. H., Secord W. A. Measurement and assessment: Making sense of test results. Educom Associates Inc., Buffalo, NY 1992
   Google Scholar