Comparison of Digital and Conventional Mammography: A ROC Study of 270 Mammograms

References

• Kopans D. B., Mayer J. E., Sadowsky N. Breast imaging. New England Journal of Medicine 1984; 310: 960–967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland R., Hendriks J. H. C. L., Verbeek A. L. M., Mravunac M., Schuurmans Stekhoven J. H. Extent, distribution, and mammographic/histological correlations of breast ductal carcinoma. in situ. Lancet 1990; 335: 519–522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland R., Connolly J. L., Gelman R. The presence of extensive intraductal component following a limited excision correlates with prominent residual disease in the remainder of the breast. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1990; 8: 113–118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan H.-P., Doi K., Vybobny C. J., Lam K.-L., Schmidt R. A. Computer-aided detection of microcalcifications in mammograms Methodology and preliminary clincial study. Investigative Radiology 1988; 23: 664–671
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davies D. H., Dance D. R. Automatic computer detection of clustered calcification in digital mammograms. Physics and Medical Biology 1990; 35(8)1111–1118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Astley S. M., Taylor C. J. Combining cues for mammographic abnormalities. 1990; 253–258, Proceedings of the 1st British Machine Vision Conference
   Google Scholar
• Karssemeijer N. A statistical method for automatic detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Proceedings of the XIIth Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging. 1991; 227–238
   Google Scholar
• Templeton A. W., Dwyer S. J., Cox G. G., Johnson J. A., Anderson W. H., Cook L. T. Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) for radiology. Proceedings of CAR'85 1985; 697–715
   Google Scholar
• McMillan J. H., Huang H. K. B., Bramble J. M., Siegel E. L. Digital Radiography. Investigative Radiology 1989; 24: 735–741
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonoda M., Takano M., Miyahara J., Hisatoyo K. Computed Radiography utilizing scanning laser stumulated luminescence. Radiology 1983; 148: 833–838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giger M. L. Film digitization. W. W. Peppier, A. Alter. 1987; 92–100, Technical requirements Proceedings of the Chest Imaging Conference 1987. Madison WI Medical Physics Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Klessens P. L. M., Barneveld Binkhlysen F. H., Ottes F. P., Winter L. H. L., Willemse A. P. P., Valk J.-P. J. Diagnostic evaluation of PACS subsystem using mammograms. Medical Informatics 1988; 13(4)326–329, de (An ROC analysis
   Google Scholar
• Oestmann J. W., Kopans D., Hall D. A., McCarthy K. A., Rubens J. R., Greene R. A comparison of digitized storage phosphors and conventional mammography in the detection of malignant microcalcifications. Investagtive Radiology 1988; 23: 725–728
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimme-Smith C, Bassett L, Gold R. H. Digital mammography: a comparison of two digitization methods. Investigative Radiology 1989; 24: 869–875
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan H.-P., Vyborny C. J., MacMahon H., Metz C. E., Doi K., Sickles E. A. Digital mammography: ROC Studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications. Investigative Radiology 1987; 22: 581–589
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hillen W. U., Schiebel U., Zaengel T. Imaging performance of a digital storage phosphor system. Medical Physics 1987; 14: 5
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty D. P., Eamann S. B., Yester M. V., Soto B., Barnes G. T., Fraser R. G. Digital and conventional chest imaging: a modified ROC study of observer performance using simulated nodules. Radiology 1986; 158: 35–39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodmann L. R., Foley W. D., Wilson C. R., Rimm A. A., Lawson T. L. Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with film digital radiography system. Radiology 1986; 158: 27–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karssemeijer N., Van Erning L. J. T. O. Iso-precision scaling of digitized mammograms to facilitate image analysis. Proceedings Medical Imaging V Conference, SPIE.. 1989
   Google Scholar
• Erning L, Knots M. J. J., Guyt J. H. J. PACS in practice: from software link to on-line communications. 1989; 489–498, Van Proceedings of CAR' 89
   Google Scholar
• Van Erning L, Thijssen M. A. O. PACS in practice: the status of the PACS project at theKarsemeijer, N., and The Part A: Introduction and the picture system. Medical Informatics. St Radboud University Hospital, Nijmegen 1988; 13: 255–264
   Google Scholar
• Bouman H. D., Knots M. J. J., Van Erning L. J. Th. O. PACS in practice: the status of the PACS project. St Radboud University Hospital, NijmegenThe Netherlands 1988; 13: 265–278, and at the Part B: A digital image archive: information analysis and developmentMedical Informatics
   Google Scholar
• Metz C. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Investigative Radiology 1989; 24: 234–245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottes F. P., de Valk J. P. J., Kroon H. M., Seely G. W., Winter L. H. L., Schultze-Kool L. J. Diagnostic image quality evaluation chain: applications of the feasible package in practice. Proceedings of the Medical Imaging III Conference. SPIE, 1989; 1093: 2–9
   Google Scholar
• Hanley J. A., McNeil B. J. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1984; 148: 839–843
   Google Scholar
• Directory of the European Standardisation Requirements for Health Care Informatics and Programme for the Development of Standards, TC 251, version 1.40 (1992-01-01)1.
   Google Scholar