Is your andrology service up to scratch?

References

• Badenoch, D. F., Evans, J. W., & McCloskey, D. J. (1989). Sperm density measurement: should this be abandoned? British Journal of Urology, 64, 521–523.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bailey, E., Fenning, N. R., Chamberlain, S., Devlin, L., Hopkisson, H., & Tomlinson, M. J. (2007). Validation of sperm counting methods using Limits of Agreement. Journal of Andrology, 28, 364–373.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barratt, C. L. R., Tomlinson, M. J., & Cooke, I. D. (1992). Prognostic significance of computerized motility analysis for in vivo fertility. Fertility & Sterility, 60, 520–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg., U., Brucker, C., & Berg, F. D. (1997). Effect of motile sperm count after swim up on outcome of intrauterine insemination. Fertility & Sterility, 67, 747–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonini, P., Plebani, M., Ceriotti, F., & Rubboli, F. (2002). Errors in laboratory medicine. Clinical Chemistry, 48, 691–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Society for Human Genetics. (2007). Professional guidelines for clinical cytogenetics and clinical molecular genetics. QF-PCR for the diagnosis of aneuploidy best practice guidelines v2.01.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, G. N. (1997). A simple monthly means chart system for monitoring sperm concentration. Human Reproduction, 12, 2710–2712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey, R. P., Pyrzak, R., Lu, P. Y., Taylor, S. N., & Rye, P. H. (1999). Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organisation threshold values for normal sperm. Fertility & Sterility, 71, 684–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, C. (2004). Human error and systems failure caused IVF mix up. Clare Dyer BMJ, 328, 1518.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, W. C., Ponting, F. A., McLaughlin, E. A., Rees, J. M., & Hull, M.G. (1992). Controlling the swimming speed of human sperm by varying the incubation temperature and its effect on cervical mucus penetration. International Journal of Andrology, 15, 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Francavilla, F., Romano, R., Santucci, R., & Poccia, G. (1990). Effect of sperm morphology and motile sperm count on outcome of IUI in oligozoospermia and/or asthenozoospermia. Fertility & Sterility, 53, 892–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, C., Liu, D. Y., Clarke, G. N., Rushford, D. D., & Baker, H. W. (2003). Automated semen analysis: ‘zona pellucida preferred’ sperm morphometry and straight-line velocity are related to pregnancy rate in subfertile couples. Human Reproduction, 18, 1643–1649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzick, D. S., Overstreet, J. W., Factor-Litvak, P., Brazil, C. K., Nakajima, S. T., Coutifaris, C., et al. (2001). Sperm morphology, motility and concentration in fertile and infertile men. New England Journal of Medicine, 345, 1388–1393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. (2002). Witnessing of clinical and laboratory procedures HFEA Chairs letter CH(02)01 – 29/08/2002. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/2680.html
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. (2009). HFEA code of practice. 8th ed.
   Google Scholar
• Keegan, B. R., Barton, S., Sanchez, X., Berkeley, A. S., Krey, L. C., & Grifo, J. (2007). Isolated teratozoospermia does not affect in vitro fertilization outcome and is not an indication for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertility & Sterility, 88, 1583–1588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keel, B. A., Quinn, P., Schmidt, C. F., Serafy, N. T. Jr., Serafy, N.T. Sr., & Schalue, T. K. (2000). Results of the American association of bioanalysts national proficiency testing programme in andrology. Human Reproduction, 15, 680–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keel, B. A., Stembridge, T. W., Pineda, G., & Serafy, N. T. Sr. (2002). Lack of standardization in performance of the semen analysis among laboratories in the United States. Fertility & Sterility, 78, 603–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kini, S., Morrell, D., Thong, K. J., Kopakaki, A., Hillier, S. & Irvine, D. S. (2010). Lack of impact of semen quality on fertilization in assisted conception. Scottish Medical Journal, 55, 20–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, T. F., Acosta, A. A., Simmons, K. F., Swanson, R. J., Matta, J. F., & Oehninger, S. (1988). Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertility & Sterility, 49, 112–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, L., Scheike, T., Jensen, T. K., Bonde, J. P., Ernst, E., Hjollund, N. H., et al. (2000). Computer-assisted semen analysis parameters as predictors for fertility of men from the general population. The Danish First Pregnancy Planner Study Team. Human Reproduction, 15, 1562–1567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matson, P. (1995). External quality assessment for semen analysis and sperm antibody detection: results of a pilot scheme. Human Reproduction, 10, 620–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer, D. (2000). Sperm preparation methods. Journal of Andrology, 21, 357–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naella, K. P., Sharma, R. K., Aziz, N., & Agarwal, A. (2006). Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility. Fertility & Sterility, 85, 629–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niles, R. (2006). Internet. http://www.robertniles.com/stats/margin.shtml . Last accessed 22 October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Toft, B. (2004). Internet. Independent review of the circumstances surrounding four adverse events that occurred in the Reproductive Medicine Units at The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, West Yorkshire. Department of Health, http://www.dh. gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4084358.pdf . Last accessed 22 October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, M. J., Kessopoulou, E., & Barratt, C. L. R. (1999). The diagnostic and prognostic value of traditional semen parameters. Journal of Andrology, 20, 588–593.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomlinson, M. J., Moffatt, O., Manicardi, G., Bizarro, D., Afnan, M., & Sakkas, D. (2001a). Interrelationships between seminal parameters and sperm nuclear DNA damage before and after density gradient centrifugation: implications for assisted conception. Human Reproduction, 16, 2160–2165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, M. J., Powell, G., Turner, J., & Sakkas, D. (2001b). One step disposable chambers for sperm concentration and motility assessment: how do they compare with the World Health Organization's recommended methods? Human Reproduction, 16, 121–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (1987). WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and semen-cervical mucus interaction, 2nd ed.Press syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (1992). WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and semen-cervical mucus interaction, 3rd edPress syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (1999). WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and semen-cervical mucus interaction, 4th ed.Press syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, 5th edWorld Health Organization Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yavas, Y., & Selub, M.R. (2004). Intrauterine insemination (IUI) pregnancy outcome is enhanced by shorter intervals from semen collection to sperm wash, from sperm wash to IUI time, and from semen collection to IUI time. Fertility & Sterility, 82, 1638–1647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinaman, M. J., Brown, C. C., Selevan, S. G., & Clegg, E. D. (2000). Semen quality and human fertility: a prospective study with healthy couples. Journal of Andrology, 21, 145–153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar