The current place of tubal surgery in the management of subfertility

References

• Akande, V. A., Cahill, D. J., Wardle, P. G., Rutherford, A. J., & Jenkins J. M. (2004). The predictive value of the “Hull & Rutherford” classification for tubal damage. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 111, 1236–1241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2008). Salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilization. Fertility & sterility, 90, S66–S68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, A. N., Yue, Z., Meng, F. J., & Petersen K (1994). Low implantation rate after in vitro fertilization in patients with hydrosalpinges diagnosed by ultrasonography. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 9, 1935–1938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boer-Meisel, M. E., te Velde, E. R., Habbema, J. D., & Kardaun J. W. (1986). Predicting the pregnancy outcome in patients treated for hydrosalpinx: a prospective study. Fertility and sterility, 45, 23–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S., Bourne, T. H., Tan, S. L., & Collins W. P. (1994). Hysterosalpingo contrast sonography (HyCoSy) and its future role within the investigation of infertility in Europe. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the international society of ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology, 4, 245–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camus, E., Poncelet, C., Goffinet, F., Wainer, B., Merlet, F., Nisand, I., et al. (1999). Pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx: a meta-analysis of published comparative studies. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 14, 1243–1249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conaghan, J., Handyside, A. H., Winston, R. M., & Leese H. J. (1993). Effects of pyruvate and glucose on the development of human preimplantation embryos in vitro. Journal of reproduction and fertility, 99, 87–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Csemiczky, G., Landgren, B. M., Fried, G., & Wramsby H (1996). High tubal damage grade is associated with low pregnancy rate in women undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 11, 2438–2440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. D., Yang, J. H., Lin, K. C., Chao, K. H., Ho, H. N., & Yang Y. S. (2002). The significance of cytokines, chemical composition, and murine embryo development in hydrosalpinx fluid for predicting the IVF outcome in women with hydrosalpinx. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 17, 128–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Déchaud, H., Daurès, J. P., Arnal, F., Humeau, C., & Hédon, B. (1998). Does previous salpingectomy improve implantation and pregnancy rates in patients with severe tubal factor infertility who are undergoing in vitro fertilization? A pilot prospective randomized study. Fertility and sterility, 69, 1020–1025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Déchaud, H., Reyftmann, R., Faidherbe, J., & Hamamah, S., Hedon B (2004). Evidence based reproductive surgery: tubal infertility. International congress series, 1266, 96–106.
   Google Scholar
• Dubuisson, J. B., Chapron, C., Ansquer, Y., & Vacher-Lavenu M. C. (1997). Proximal tubal occlusion: is there an alternative to microsurgery? Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 12, 692–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducarme, G., Uzan, M., Hugues, J. N., Cedrin-Durnerin, I., & Poncelet C (2006). Management of hydrosalpinx before or during in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a national postal survey in France. Fertility and sterility, 86, 1013–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eytan, O., Azem, F., Gull, I., Wolman, I., Elad, D., & Jaffa A. J. (2001). The mechanism of hydrosalpinx in embryo implantation. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 16, 2662–2667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantzen, C. & Schlösser, H. W. (1982). Microsurgery and postinfectious tubal infertility. Fertility and sterility, 38, 397–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelbaya, T. A., Nardo, L. G., Fitzgerald, C. T., Horne, G., Brison, D. R., & Lieberman B. A. (2006). Ovarian response to gonadotropins after laparoscopic salpingectomy or the division of fallopian tubes for hydrosalpinges. Fertility and sterility, 85, 1464–1468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granot, I., Dekel, N., Segal, I., Fieldust, S., Shoham, Z., & Barash A (1998). Is hydrosalpinx fluid cytotoxic? Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 13, 1620–1624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammadieh, N., Afnan, M., Evans, J., Sharif, K., Amso, N., & Olufowobi O (2004). A postal survey of hydrosalpinx management prior to IVF in the United Kingdom. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 19, 1009–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammadieh, N., Coomarasamy, A., Ola, B., Papaioannou, S., Afnan, M., & Sharif K (2008). Ultrasound-guided hydrosalpinx aspiration during oocyte collection improves pregnancy outcome in IVF: a randomized controlled trial. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 23, 1113–1117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, H., Tekay, A., Volpi, E., Martikainen, H., & Jouppila P (1995). Transvaginal salpingosonography for the assessment of tubal patency in infertile women: methodological and clinical experiences. Fertility and sterility, 64, 293–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. A., McKenzie, R. M., & Fletcher H. M. (2011). The bcp gene in the bcp-recA-vimA-vimE-vimF operon is important in oxidative stress resistance in Porphyromonas gingivalis W83. Molecular oral microbiology, 26, 62–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassabji, M., Sims, J. A., Butler, L., & Muasher S. J. (1994). Reduced pregnancy outcome in patients with unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinx after in vitro fertilization. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 56, 129–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerin, J. F. & Cattanach, S. (2007). Successful pregnancy outcome with the use of in vitro fertilization after Essure hysteroscopic sterilization. Fertility and sterility, 87, 1212.e1–1212.e4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontoravdis, A., Makrakis, E., Pantos, K., Botsis, D., Deligeoroglou, E., & Creatsas G (2006). Proximal tubal occlusion and salpingectomy result in similar improvement in in vitro fertilization outcome in patients with hydrosalpinx. Fertility and sterility, 86, 1642–1649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land, J. A., Evers, J. L., & Goossens V. J. (1998). How to use Chlamydia antibody testing in subfertility patients. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 13, 1094–1098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lass, A., Ellenbogen, A., Croucher, C., Trew, G., Margara, R., Becattini, C., et al. (1998). Effect of salpingectomy on ovarian response to superovulation in an in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. Fertility and sterility, 70, 1035–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessey, B. A., Castelbaum, A. J., Buck, C. A., Lei, Y., Yowell, C. W., & Sun J (1994). Further characterization of endometrial integrins during the menstrual cycle and in pregnancy. Fertility and sterility, 62, 497–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansour, R. T., Aboulghar, M. A., Serour, G. I., & Riad R (1991). Fluid accumulation of the uterine cavity before embryo transfer: a possible hindrance for implantation. Journal of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: IVF, 8, 157–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McComb, P. F., Lee, N. H., & Stephenson M. D. (1991). Reproductive outcome after microsurgery for proximal and distal occlusions in the same fallopian tube. Fertility and sterility, 56, 134–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, W. R., Castelbaum, A. J., Somkuti, S., Sagoskin, A. W., Doyle, M., Harris, J. E., et al. (1997). Hydrosalpinges adversely affect markers of endometrial receptivity. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 12, 1393–1398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mijatovic, V., Veersema, S., Emanuel, M. H., Schats, R., & Hompes P. G. (2010). Essure hysteroscopic tubal occlusion device for the treatment of hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in patients with a contraindication for laparoscopy. Fertility and sterility, 93, 1338–1342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, B. W., Dijkman, B., Wertheim, P., Lijmer, J., van der Veen, F., & Bossuyt P. M. (1997). The accuracy of serum chlamydial antibodies in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: a meta-analysis. Fertility and sterility, 67, 1031–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshin, V., & Hotineanu A (2006). Reproductive outcome of the proximal tubal occlusion prior to IVF in patients with hydrosalpinx. Human reproduction, 21, i193–i194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, M. D., Acord, D. L., & Young S. W. (2006). Likelihood ratio of sonographic findings in discriminating hydrosalpinx from other adnexal masses. AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 186, 1033–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puttemans, P., Campo, R., Gordts, S., & Brosens I (2000). Hydrosalpinx and ART: hydrosalpinx-functional surgery or salpingectomy. Human reproduction, 9, 861–863.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, A. J. & Jenkins, J. M. (2002). Hull and Rutherford classification of infertility. Human Fertility, 5(1 suppl), S41–45.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, G. & Trew, G. (2004). Reconstruction, destruction and IVF: dilemmas in the art of tubal surgery. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 111, 1174–1181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagoskin, A. W., Lessey, B. A., Mottla, G. L., Richter, K. S., Chetkowski, R. J., Chang, A. S., et al. (2003). Salpingectomy or proximal tubal occlusion of unilateral hydrosalpinx increases the potential for spontaneous pregnancy. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 18, 2634–2637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steptoe, P. C. & Edwards, R. G. (1978). Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet, 2, 366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandell, A., Lindhard, A., Waldenström, U., Thorburn, J., Janson, P. O., & Hamberger L (1999). Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: a prospective, randomized multicentre trial in Scandinavia on salpingectomy prior to IVF. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 14, 2762–2769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandell, A. & Lindhard, A. (2000). Hydrosalpinx and ART. Salpingectomy prior to IVF can be recommended to a well-defined subgroup of patients. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 15, 2072–2074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandell, A., Lindhard, A., Waldenström, U., & Thorburn J (2001). Prophylactic salpingectomy does not impair the ovarian response in IVF treatment. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 16, 1135–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandell, A. & Lindhard, A. (2002). Why does hydrosalpinx reduce fertility? The importance of hydrosalpinx fluid. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 17, 1141–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandell, A., Sjögren, A., Bentin-Ley, U., Thorburn, J., Hamberger, L., & Brännström M. (1998). Hydrosalpinx fluid does not adversely affect the normal development of human embryos and implantation in vitro. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 13, 2921–2925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandell, A., Waldenström, U., Nilsson, L., & Hamberger L (1994). Hydrosalpinx reduces in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer pregnancy rates. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 9, 861–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swart, P., Mol, B. W., van der Veen, F., van Beurden, M., Redekop, W. K., & Bossuyt P. M. (1995). The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: a meta-analysis. Fertility and sterility, 64, 486–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurmond, A. S., Machan, L. S., Maubon, A. J., Rouanet, J. P., Hovsepian, D. M., Moore, A., et al. (2000). A review of selective salpingography and fallopian tube catheterization. Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 20, 1759–1768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay, J. I., Rutherford, A. J., Killick, S. R., Maguiness, S. D., Partridge, R. J., & Leese H. J. (1997). Human tubal fluid: production, nutrient composition and response to adrenergic agents. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 12, 2451–2456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandromme, J., Chasse, E., Lejeune, B., Van Rysselberge, M., Delvigne, A., & Leroy F (1995). Hydrosalpinges in in vitro fertilization: an unfavourable prognostic feature. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 10, 576–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasquez, G., Boeckx, W., & Brosens I (1995). No correlation between peritubal and mucosal adhesions in hydrosalpinges. Fertility and sterility, 64, 1032–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watrelot, A., Nisolle, M., Chelli, H., Hocke, C., Rongières, C., & Racinet C; International Group for Fertiloscopy Evaluation. (2003). Is laparoscopy still the gold standard in infertility assessment? A comparison of fertiloscopy versus laparoscopy in infertility. Results of an international multicentre prospective trial: the ‘FLY’ (Fertiloscopy-LaparoscopY) study. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 18, 834–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar