When ‘sperm’ becomes ‘donor’: Transitions in parents’ views of the sperm donor

References

• Adrian, S. (2010). Sperm stories: policies and practices of sperm banking in Denmark and Sweden. European Journal of Women's Studies, 17, 393–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G., Butler, A., & Nachtigall, R.D. (2005). Resemblance talk: a challenge for parents whose children were conceived with donor gametes in the US. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 1300–1309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belgian Act of 6 July 2007. Law on assisted reproduction and the use of surplus embryo's and gametes [Wet betreffende de medisch begeleide voortplanting en de bestemming van de overtallige embryo's en de gameten], B.S. 17 July 2007;38575.
   Google Scholar
• Belgian Federal Advisory Committee of Bio-Ethics. (2004). Recommendation n° 27 regarding sperm donation and oocyte donation. [pdf] Brussels: Belgian Advisory Committee of Bio-Ethics Available at: <http://www.health.belgium.be/eportal/Healthcare/Consultativebodies/Commitees/Bioethics/Opinions/index.htm> [accessed 29 May 2013]
   Google Scholar
• BELRAP, 2009-2013. Belgian Register for Assisted Procreation [online] Available at: http://www.belrap.be. [Accessed 29 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Belgian Royal Decree, 4 June 2003, BRD as amendment of the RD of 25 April 2002 on the determination and the settlement of the financial budgets of the hospitals [KB tot wijziging van het KB van 25 April 2002 betreffende de vaststelling en de vereffening van het budget van financiële middelen van de ziekenuizen], B.S. 16 June 2003;32127.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, E., Langridge, D., & Harris, R. (2010). Family building in donor conception: parents’ experiences of sharing information. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 28, 116–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, E. (2012). Genes r us? Making sense of genetic and non-genetic relationships following anonymous donor insemination. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 24, 719–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., Frith, L., & Jones, C. (2012). Donor-conceived people's views and experiences of their genetic origins: A critical analysis of the research evidence. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19, 769–789.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brewaeys, A., de Bruyn, J.K., Louwe, L.A., & Helmerhorst, F.M. (2005). Anonymous or identity-registered sperm donors? A study of Dutch recipients’ choices. Human Reproduction, 20, 820–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr, J. (2009). Fear, fascination and the sperm donor as “abjection” in interviews with heterosexual recipients of donor insemination. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31, 705–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London, Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (1990). “Discovering” chronic illness: using grounded theory. Social Science & Medicine, 30, 1161–1172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M., Blyth, E., & Daniels, K. (2007). Past semen donors’ views about the use of a voluntary contact register. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 14, 411–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, K., Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., & Curson, R. (2005). Previous semen donors and their views regarding the sharing of information with offspring. Human Reproduction, 20, 1670–1675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, K.R., Kramer, W., & Perez-y-Perez, M.V. (2012). Semen donors who are open to contact with their offspring: Issues and implications for them and their families. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 25, 670–677.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2009). Gamete donation: parents’ experiences of searching for their child's donor sibling and donor. Human Reproduction, 24, 505–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace, V. & Daniels, K. (2007). The irrelevance of genetics: engendering parallel worlds of procreation and reproduction. Sociology of Health & Illness, 29, 692–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace, V.M. (2008). The psychosocial politics of paternity in the case of male donated gametes. Women's Studies International Forum, 31, 257–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace, V., Daniels, K., & Gillett, W. (2008). The donor, the father, and the imaginary constitution of the family: Parents’ constructions in the case of donor insemination. Social Science & Medicine, 66, 301–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, K. (2006). Constructing families and kinship through donor insemination. Sociology of Health & Illness, 28, 261–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershberger, P., Klock, S.C., & Barnes, R.B. (2007). Disclosure decisions among pregnant women who received donor oocytes: a phenomenological study. Fertility and Sterility, 87, 288–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, N., Culley, L., Rapport, F., Johnson, M., & Bharadwaj, A. (2009). ”Public” perceptions of gamete donation: a research review. Public Understanding of Science, 18, 61–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indekeu, A., D’Hooghe, T., De Sutter, P., Demyttenaere, K., Vanderschueren, D., Vanderschot, B., et al. (2012). Parenthood motives, well-being and disclosure among men from couples ready to start treatment with intrauterine insemination using their own sperm or donor sperm. Human Reproduction, 27, 159–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indekeu, A., Dierickx, K., Schotsmans, P., Daniels, K.R., Rober, P., & D’Hooghe, T. (2013). Factors contributing to parental decision-making in disclosing donor conception: a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 19, 714–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indekeu, A., D’Hooghe, T., Daniels, K.R., Dierickx, K., & Rober, P. (2014). ‘Of course he's our child’: Transitions in ‘social parenthood’ in donor sperm recipient families. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 28, 106–115.
   Google Scholar
• Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2011). Sperm and oocyte donors’ experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with their donor offspring. Human Reproduction, 26, 638–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkman, M. (2004). Saviours and satyrs: ambivalence in narrative meanings of sperm provision. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 6, 319–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klock, S.C. & Greenfeld, D.A. (2004). Parents’ knowledge about the donors and their attitudes toward disclosure in oocyte donation. Human Reproduction, 19, 1575–1579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. & Brinkmann, S. (2008). Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2007). Analysing qualitative longitudinal research in evaluations. Social Policy & Society, 6, 545–556.
   Google Scholar
• Nordqvist, P. (2010). Out of sight, out of mind: family resemblance in lesbian donor conception. Sociology, 44, 1128–1144.
   Google Scholar
• Nordqvist, P. (2012). Origins and originators: lesbian couples negotiating parental identities and sperm donor conception. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 14, 297–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peddie, V.L., Porter, M., Counsell, C., Caie, L., Pearson, D., & Bhattacharya, S. (2009). “Not taken in by media hype”: how potential donors, recipients and members of the general public perceive stem cell research. Human Reproduction, 24, 1106–1113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, M. & Bhattacharya, S. (2008). Helping themselves to get pregnant: a qualitative longitudinal study on the information-seeking behavior of infertile couples. Human Reproduction, 23, 567–572.
   Google Scholar
• Rodino, I.S., Burton, P.J., & Sanders, K.A. (2011). Donor information considered important to donors, recipients and offspring: an Australian perspective. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 22, 303–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart-Smith, S.J., Smith, J.A., & Scott, E.J. (2012). To know or not to know? Dilemmas for women receiving unknown oocyte donation. Human Reproduction, 27, 2067–2075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, U., Vandermeeren, M., Vanderschueren, D., Enzlin, P., Demyttenaere, K., D’Hooghe, T. (2013). A systematic review of sperm donors: demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation. Human Reproduction Update, 19, 37–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar