Publication Cover
Human Fertility
an international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice
Volume 18, 2015 - Issue 2
174
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A qualitative study exploring counselling for release of information to participants of a donor-assisted conception programme

, , &
Pages 134-140 | Received 10 Apr 2014, Accepted 29 Aug 2014, Published online: 16 Jan 2015

References

  • Adams, D. & Lorbach, C. (2012). Accessing donor conception information in Australia: a call for retrospective access. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19, 707–721.
  • Allan, S. (2012a). A cross-jurisdictional study of regulatory requirements and practice regarding the recording of donor information and its release to donor conceived people. A report prepared for the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust of Australia. Canberra.
  • Allan, S. (2012b). Donor conception, secrecy and the search for information. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19, 631–650.
  • ANZICA. (2012). Donor Linking Guidelines: [Available at: http://www.fertilitysociety.com.au/anzica/policy-documents/]. Accessed on 16th December 2013.
  • Australian Government (2012). Government Response to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee Report: Donor Conception Practices in Australia.
  • Berger, R. & Paul, M. (2008). Family secrets and family functioning: The case of donor assistance. Family Processes, 47, 553–566.
  • Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., Frith, L., & Jones, C. (2012). Donor-conceived people's views and experiences of their genetic origins: a critical analysis of the research evidence. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19, 769–789.
  • Blyth, E., & Frith, L. (2009). Donor-conceived people's access to genetic and biographical history: an analysis of provisions in different jurisdictions permitting disclosure of donor identity. International Journal of Law, Policy and Family, 23, 174–191.
  • Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Sage Publications, London.
  • Crawshaw, M., Gunter, C., Tidy, C., & Atherton, F. (2013). Working with previously anonymous gamete donors and donor-conceived adults: recent practice experiences of running the DNA-based voluntary information exchange and contact register, UK DonorLink. Human Fertility, 16, 26–30.
  • Cushing, A. (2010). ‘I just want more information about who I am’: The search experience of sperm-donor offspring, searching for information about their donors and genetic heritage. Information Research, 15, paper 428. [Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/15-2/paper428.html]. Accessed on 25th November 2013.
  • Daniels, K., & Taylor, K. (1993). Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Politics and the Life Sciences, 12, 155–170.
  • Daniels, K.R., Kramer, W., & Perez-y-Perez, M.V. (2012). Semen donors who are open to contact with their offspring: issues and implications for them and their families. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 25, 670–677.
  • Hammarberg, K., Johnson, L., & Petrillo, T. (2011). Gamete and embryo donation and surrogacy in Australia: The social context and regulatory framework. International Journal of Fertility and Sterility, 4, 176–183.
  • Hammarberg, K., Johnson, L., Bourne, K., Fisher, J., & Kirkman, M. (2014). Proposed legislative change mandating retrospective release of identifying information: consultation with donors and government response. Human Reproduction, 29, 286–292.
  • Hewitt, G. (2002). Missing links: Identity issues of donor conceived people. Journal of Fertility Counselling, 9, 14–20.
  • Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act. (2004). New Zealand.
  • Human Reproductive Technology Act (1991). Western Australia.
  • McWhinnie, A. (2001). Gamete donation and anonymity: should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents? Human Reproduction, 16, 807–817.
  • National Health and Medical Research Council. (2007). Ethical Guidelines on the use of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Clinical Practice and Research (National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, ACT) NHMRC Guidelines. [Available at https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/e78.pdf]. Accessed on 25th November 2013.
  • Reproductive Technology Accreditation Committee (RTAC) (2010). RTAC Code of Practice: [Available at: http://www.fertilitysociety.com.au/rtac/]. Accessed on 16th December 2013.
  • Rodino, I.S., Burton, P., & Sanders, K.A. (2011). Donor information considered important to donors, recipients, and offspring: an Australian perspective. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 22, 303–311.
  • Rodino, I.S., Burton, P., & Sanders, K.A. (2012). Who am I? Family formation with the help of a donor. Journal of the Western Australian Genealogical Society, 12, 90–93.
  • Senate Report, (Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee). (2011). Inquiry into donor conception in Australia. Canberra.
  • Turner, A.J., & Coyle, A. (2000). What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Human Reproduction, 15, 2041–2051.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.