A qualitative study exploring counselling for release of information to participants of a donor-assisted conception programme

References

• Adams, D. & Lorbach, C. (2012). Accessing donor conception information in Australia: a call for retrospective access. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19, 707–721.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allan, S. (2012a). A cross-jurisdictional study of regulatory requirements and practice regarding the recording of donor information and its release to donor conceived people. A report prepared for the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust of Australia. Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, S. (2012b). Donor conception, secrecy and the search for information. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19, 631–650.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ANZICA. (2012). Donor Linking Guidelines: [Available at: http://www.fertilitysociety.com.au/anzica/policy-documents/]. Accessed on 16th December 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government (2012). Government Response to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee Report: Donor Conception Practices in Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, R. & Paul, M. (2008). Family secrets and family functioning: The case of donor assistance. Family Processes, 47, 553–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., Frith, L., & Jones, C. (2012). Donor-conceived people's views and experiences of their genetic origins: a critical analysis of the research evidence. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19, 769–789.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blyth, E., & Frith, L. (2009). Donor-conceived people's access to genetic and biographical history: an analysis of provisions in different jurisdictions permitting disclosure of donor identity. International Journal of Law, Policy and Family, 23, 174–191.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Sage Publications, London.
   Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M., Gunter, C., Tidy, C., & Atherton, F. (2013). Working with previously anonymous gamete donors and donor-conceived adults: recent practice experiences of running the DNA-based voluntary information exchange and contact register, UK DonorLink. Human Fertility, 16, 26–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushing, A. (2010). ‘I just want more information about who I am’: The search experience of sperm-donor offspring, searching for information about their donors and genetic heritage. Information Research, 15, paper 428. [Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/15-2/paper428.html]. Accessed on 25th November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, K., & Taylor, K. (1993). Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Politics and the Life Sciences, 12, 155–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daniels, K.R., Kramer, W., & Perez-y-Perez, M.V. (2012). Semen donors who are open to contact with their offspring: issues and implications for them and their families. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 25, 670–677.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammarberg, K., Johnson, L., & Petrillo, T. (2011). Gamete and embryo donation and surrogacy in Australia: The social context and regulatory framework. International Journal of Fertility and Sterility, 4, 176–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammarberg, K., Johnson, L., Bourne, K., Fisher, J., & Kirkman, M. (2014). Proposed legislative change mandating retrospective release of identifying information: consultation with donors and government response. Human Reproduction, 29, 286–292.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hewitt, G. (2002). Missing links: Identity issues of donor conceived people. Journal of Fertility Counselling, 9, 14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act. (2004). New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Human Reproductive Technology Act (1991). Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• McWhinnie, A. (2001). Gamete donation and anonymity: should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents? Human Reproduction, 16, 807–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council. (2007). Ethical Guidelines on the use of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Clinical Practice and Research (National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, ACT) NHMRC Guidelines. [Available at https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/e78.pdf]. Accessed on 25th November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Reproductive Technology Accreditation Committee (RTAC) (2010). RTAC Code of Practice: [Available at: http://www.fertilitysociety.com.au/rtac/]. Accessed on 16th December 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rodino, I.S., Burton, P., & Sanders, K.A. (2011). Donor information considered important to donors, recipients, and offspring: an Australian perspective. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 22, 303–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodino, I.S., Burton, P., & Sanders, K.A. (2012). Who am I? Family formation with the help of a donor. Journal of the Western Australian Genealogical Society, 12, 90–93.
   Google Scholar
• Senate Report, (Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee). (2011). Inquiry into donor conception in Australia. Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A.J., & Coyle, A. (2000). What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Human Reproduction, 15, 2041–2051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar