Focusing on abuse, not use, in drug education

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, J. C., & Helzer, J. A. (1991). Syndromes of drug abuse and dependency. In L. N. Robins, & D. A. Regier (Eds.), Psychiatric disorders in America (pp. 116–154). New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, J. (1998). 100 years of “Just Say No” versus “Just Say Know”. Reevaluating drug education goals for the coming century. Evaluation Review, 22(1), 15–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. H., D’Emidio-Caston, M., & Benard, B. (2000). Resilience education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. H., & Kreft, I. G. G. (1998). Introduction to the special issue: Zero effects of drug prevention programs: Issues and solutions. Evaluation Review, 22(1), 3–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bukowski, W. J. (1986). School-based substance abuse prevention: A review of program research. Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 18(1–2), 95–115.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Paediatric Society. (2008). Harm reduction: An approach to reducing risky health behaviours in adolescents. Paediatric Child Health, 13(1), 53–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chng, C. L. (1981). The goal of abstinence: Implications for drug education. Journal of Drug Education, 11(1), 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2002a). Delta 1: Drug education learning and training activities for 11–14 year olds/key stage 3: A developmental drug education programme for use in schools, youth clubs and other settings. London: DrugScope.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2002b). Delta 2: Drug education learning and training activities for 14–18 year olds/key stages 4/5: A developmental drug education programme for use in schools, youth clubs and other settings. London: DrugScope.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Kay, J. (2004). The new primary school drugs education pack: The essential guide to developing an effective, whole-school approach to drug education. Liverpool: Healthwise.
   Google Scholar
• D’Emidio-Caston, M., & Brown, J. H. (1998). The other side of the story: Student narratives on the California drug, alcohol, and tobacco education programs. Evaluation Review, 22(1), 95–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, E. (1999). Drug prohibition and public health: 25 years of evidence. Public Health Reports, 114(1), 14–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drug Policy Alliance. (2011). Forty years of failure. Retrieved from http://www.drugpolicy.org/facts/new-solutions-drug-policy/forty-years-failure
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, D. F., & Gold, R. S. (1982). Drugs and the whole person. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, D. F., & Gold, R. S. (1983). Cultivating drug use: A strategy for the eighties. Bulletin of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2(3), 143–147.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, D. F., Nicholson, T., Clifford, P., Hawkins, W., & Petosa, R. (1994). Harm reduction: An emerging new paradigm for drug education. Journal of Drug Education, 24(4), 281–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Economist. (2011, September 17). Briefing: Profligacy is not the problem. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/21529087
   Google Scholar
• Ennett, S. T., Tobler, N. S., Ringwalt, C. L., & Flewelling, R. L. (1994). How effective is Drug Abuse Resistance Education? A meta-analysis of Project DARE outcome evaluations. American Journal of Public Health, 84(9), 1394–1401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glantz, M. (1992). A developmental psychotherapy model of drug abuse vulnerability. In M. Glantz, & R. Pickens (Eds.), Vulnerability to drug abuse (pp. 389–418). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Global Commission on Drug Policy. (2011). War on drugs: Report of the Global Commission on Drug Policy. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Edelstein. Retrieved from http://www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/Report
   Google Scholar
• Goodstadt, M. S. (1989). Drug education: The prevention issues. Journal of Drug Education, 19, 197–208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Home Office. (1984). Prevention: Report of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, S. (1991). Panel discussion on the topic, “Should public health adopt a harm reduction drug control strategy?” The annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• MacCoun, R., & Reuter, P. (1997). Interpreting Dutch cannabis policy: Reasoning by analogy in the legalization debate. Science, 278(5335), 47–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McBride, N., Farringdon, F., Midford, R., Meuleners, L., & Phillips, M. (2004). Harm minimization in school drug education: Final results of the School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project (SHAHRP). Addiction, 99, 278–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeal, R. B., & Hanson, W. B. (1995). An examination of strategies for gaining convergent validity in natural experiments: D.A.R.E. as an illustrative case study. Evaluation Review, 19, 141–158.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D., & Saunders, B. (1991). Youth drug use and the prevention of problems. International Journal on Drug Policy, 2(5), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Nadelmann, E. A. (1989). Drug prohibition in the United States: Costs, consequences, and alternatives. Science, 245(4921), 939–947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newport, F. (2011, October 11). Record-high 50% of Americans favor legalizing marijuana use. Gallup Daily News. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/150149/Record-High-Americans-Favor-Legalizing-Marijuana.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, T., White, J., & Duncan, D. F. (1999). A survey of adult recreational drug use via the World Wide Web: The DRUGNET study. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 31(4), 415–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normand, J., Lempert, R. O., & O’Brien, C. P. (Eds.) (1994). Under the influence? Drugs and the American work force. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, P., & Caulkins, J. P. (1995). Redefining the goals of a national drug policy: Recommendations of a working group. American Journal of Public Health, 85(8), 1050–1063.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, M. (1996). Kids, drugs, and drug education, a harm reduction approach. Hackensack, NJ: The National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, M. (2002). Safety first: A reality-based approach to teens, drugs, and drug education. San Francisco, CA: Drug Policy Alliance.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, D. (1999). Injection drug use and HIV/AIDS: An ethics commentary on priority issues. In Canadian HIV/AIDS legal network, injection drug use and HIV/AIDS: Legal and ethical issues. Background Papers. Montreal: Canadian HIV/AIDS Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufacturing and Commerce, Commission on Illegal Drugs, Communities and Public Policy. (2007). Drugs – Facing facts. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Steiker, L. H., Poku, D., & Poku, D. (2010). The dialogue: Non-abstinence based drug prevention for and by high school youth. Presented at Eighth National Harm Reduction Conference, Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2011). Results from the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Rockville, MD: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Trebach, A. S. (1987). The great drug war. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• West, S. L., & O’Neal, K. K. (2004). Project D.A.R.E. outcome effectiveness revisited. American Journal of Public Health, 94(6), 1027–1029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2006). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (10th Rev. ed.). Geneva: Author. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online/
   Google Scholar