Developing attributes for discrete choice experiments in health: a systematic literature review and case study of alcohol misuse interventions

References

• Bell, R. A., Paterniti, D. A., Azari, R., Duberstein, P. R., Epstein, R. M., Rochlen, A. B., Johnson, M. D., Orrange, S. E., Slee, C., & Kravitz, R. L. (2010). Encouraging patients with depressive symptoms to seek care: A mixed methods approach to message development. Patient Education and Counselling, 78(2), 198–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges, J. F. P., Hauber, A. B., Marshall, D., Lloyd, A., Prosser, L. A., Regier, D. A., Johnson, R., & Mauskopf, J. (2011). Conjoint analysis applications in health—A checklist: A report of the ISPOR good research practices for conjoint analysis task force. Value in Health, 14(4), 403–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burge, P., Devlin, N., Appleby, J., Rohr, C., & Grant, J. (2004). Do patients always prefer quicker treatment?: A discrete choice analysis of patients’ stated preferences in the London patient choice project. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 3(4), 183–194.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coast, J., Al-Janabi, H., Sutton, E. J., Horrocks, S. A., Vosper, A. J., Swancutt, D. R., & Flynn, T. N. (2012). Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: Issues and recommendations. Health Economics, 21(6), 730–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coast, J., & Horrocks, S. (2007). Developing attributes for discrete choice experiments: A case study using qualitative methods. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 12, 25–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheraghi-Sohi, S., Bower, P., Mead, N., McDonald, R., Whalley, D., & Roland, M. (2007). Making sense of patient priorities: Applying discrete choice methods in primary care using ‘think aloud’ technique. Family Practice, 24(3), 276–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essers, B. A., van Helvoort-Postulart, D., Prins, M. H., Neumann, M., & Dirksen, C. D. (2010). Does the inclusion of a cost attribute result in different preferences for the surgical treatment of primary basal cell carcinoma?: A comparison of two discrete-choice experiments. Pharmacoeconomics 28(6), 507–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, E., Coyle, D. E., Durieux-Smith, A., Graham, I. D., Angus, D. E., & Gaboury, I. (2007). Parents’ preferences for services for children with hearing loss: A conjoint analysis study. Ear and Hearing, 28(6), 842–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerard, K., Ryan, M., & Amaya-Amaya, M. (2008). Introduction. In M. Ryan, K. Gerard, & M. Amaya-Amaya (Eds.), Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care (pp. 1–10). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Grewal, I., Lewis, J., Flynn, T. N., Brown, J., Bond, J., & Coast, J. (2006). Developing attributes for a generic quality of life measure for older people: Preferences or capabilities? Social Science and Medicine, 62(8), 1891–1901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günther, O. H., Kürstein, B., Riedel-Heller, S.G., & König, H. H. (2010). The role of monetary and nonmonetary incentives on the choice of practice establishment: A stated preference study of young physicians in Germany. Health Services Research, 45(1), 212–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J., Kenny, P., King, M., Louviere, J., Viney, R., & Yeoh, A. (2002). Using stated preference discrete choice modelling to evaluate the introduction of varicella vaccination. Health Economics, 11, 457–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halme, M., Linden, K., & Kääriä, K. (2009). Patients’ preferences for generic and branded over-the-counter medicines: An adaptive conjoint analysis approach. Patient, 2(4), 243–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hundley, V., Ryan, M., Graham, W. (2001). Assessing women’s preferences for intrapartum care. Birth, 28(4), 254–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, F. R., Lancsar, E., Marshall, D., Kilambi, V., Muehlbacher, A., Regier, D. A., Bresnahan, D. W., Kanninen, B., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2013). Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: Report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force. Value in Health, 16(1), 3–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J. J., & Lancsar, E. (2009). Discrete choice experiments in health: The good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 4, 527–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J. (2008) Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: A user's guide. Pharmacoeconomics, 26(8), 661–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangham, L. J., Hanson, K., & McPake, B. (2009). How to do (or not to do) … Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. Health Policy and Planning, 24(2), 151–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, L., Cairns, J., & Osman, L. (2001). Symptom‐based outcome measures for asthma: The use of discrete choice methods to assess patient preferences. Health Policy, 57, 193–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moayyedi, P., Wardman, M., Toner, J., Ryan, M., & Duffett, S. (2002). Establishing patient preferences for gastroenterology clinic reorganization using conjoint analysis. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 14, 429–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, A., Shackley, P., Pickin, M., & Brazier, J. (2000). Quantifying patient preferences for out-of-hours primary care. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 5(4), 214–218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). (2009). Methods for the Development of NICE Public Health Guidance (2nd ed.). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Nieboer, A. P., Koolman, X., & Stolk, E. A. (2010). Preferences for long-term care services: Willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment. Social Science and Medicine, 70(9), 1317–1325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, J., & Longworth, L. (2002). Investigating the structural reliability of a discrete choice experiment within health technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 18(1), 139–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, J. (2000). Public preferences for the allocation of donor liver grafts for transplantation. Health Economics, 9, 137–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, J., & Buxton, M. (1999). Patients’ preferences regarding the process and outcomes of life-saving technology. An application of conjoint analysis to liver transplantation. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 15(2), 340–351.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. (1999). Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: An application to invitro fertilisation. Social Science and Medicine, 48(4), 535–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. (1996). Using Consumer Preferences in Health Care Decision Making. The Application of Conjoint Analysis. London: Office of Health Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., & Gerard, K. (2003). Use of discrete choice experiments in health economics: Moving forward. In T. Scott, A. Maynard, & B. Elliott (Eds.), Advances in Health Economics (pp. 2–40). New York: J. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., & Hughes, J. (1997). Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management. Health Economics, 6(3), 261–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampietro-Colom, L., Espallargues, M., Rodríguez, E., Comas, M., Alonso, J., Castells, X., & Pinto, J. L. (2008). Wide social participation in prioritizing patients on waiting lists for joint replacement: A conjoint analysis. Medical Decision Making, 28(4), 554–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A. (2002). Identifying and analysing dominant preferences in discrete choice experiments: An application in health care. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(3), 383–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swancutt, D. R., Greenfield, S. M., & Wilson, S. (2008). Women’s colposcopy experience and preferences: A mixed methods study. BMC Women’s Health, 8, 2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Helvoort-Postulart, D., Dellaert, B. G., van der Weijden, T., von Meyenfeldt, M. F., & Dirksen, C. D. (2009). Discrete choice experiments for complex health-care decisions: Does hierarchical information integration offer a solution? Health Economics, 18(8), 903–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston, A., & Fitzgerald, P. (2004). Discrete choice experiment to derive willingness to pay for methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy versus simple excision surgery in basal cell carcinoma. Pharmacoeconomics 22(18), 1195–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, J., Scott, A., & Osborne, R. H. (2009). Designing choice experiments with many attributes. An application to setting priorities for orthopaedic waiting lists. Health Economics, 18(6), 681–696.
   Google Scholar
• Youngkong, S., Baltussen, R., Tantivess, S., Koolman, X., & Teerawattananon, Y. (2010). Criteria for priority setting of HIV/AIDS interventions in Thailand: A discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Services Research, 10, 197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar