The ultrasonic diagnosis and evaluation of intrauterine growth restriction

References

• Allen MC. Developmental outcome and follow-up of the small-for-gestational age infant. Semin Peri- natol 1984;8:123–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor DJ. Low birth weight and neurodevelop- mental handicap. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1984;11:525–31
   Google Scholar
• Edouard L, Alberman E. National trends in the identified causes of perinatal mortality, 1960–1978. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980;87:833–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones RAK, Roberton NRC. Problems of the small- for-dates baby. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1984;11:499–519
   Google Scholar
• Tejani N, Mann LI. Diagnosis and management of the small-for-gestational age fetus. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1977;20:943–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsieh HL, Lee KS, Khoshnood B, et al. Fetal death rate in the United States, 1979–1990: trend and racial disparity. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:33–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlenius I, Floberg J, Thomassen P. Sixty-six cases of intrauterine fetal death: a prospective study with an extensive test protocol. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1995;74:109–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cefalo RC. The hazards of labor and delivery for the intrauterine growth-retarded fetus. J Reprod Med 1978;21:300–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C, Moawad AH, Rosenow PJ, et al. Acid–base characteristics of fetuses with intrauterine growth retardation during labor and delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;137:353–61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neligan GA, Kolvin I, Scott D, et al. Born too soon or born too small. A follow-up study to seven years of age. In Spastic International Medical Publications. London: William Heinemann Medical Books, 1978:66
   Google Scholar
• Keirse MJNC. Epidemiology and aetiology of the growth-retarded baby. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1984;11:415–22
   Google Scholar
• Seeds JW. Impaired fetal growth: definition and clinical diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 1984;64:303–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma TR. Low birth weight babies. The small- for-gestational age. A review of current manage- ment. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1984;39:616–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ott WJ. Intrauterine growth retardation and pre- term delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:1710–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeye RL, Dixon JB. Distortions in fetal growth standards. Pediatr Res 1978;12:987–1008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott WJ. The diagnosis of altered fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 1988;15:237–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg AL, Cutter GR, Hoffman HJ, et al. Intrauterine growth retardation: standards for diag- nosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:271–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg RL, Nelson KG, Koski JF, et al. Low birth weight, intrauterine growth retardation, and pre- term delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;152:980–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott WJ. Reference curves. In Ott WJ, ed. Clinical Obstetrical Ultrasound. New York: Wiley-Less, 1999: 353–84
   Google Scholar
• Tamura RK, Sabbagha RE, Depp R, et al. Diminished growth in fetuses both preterm after spontaneous labor or rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;148:1105–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander G, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, et al. A United States National reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1997;87:163–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson GD, Blidner IN, McClemont S, et al. Determinants of size at birth in a Canadian popula- tion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;150:236–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoury MJ, Cohen BH. Genetic heterogeneity of prematurity and intrauterine growth restriction: clues from the Old Order Amish. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157:400–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller HC. Prenatal factors affecting intrauterine growth retardation. Clin Perinatol 1988;12:307–15
   Google Scholar
• Peters TJ, Golding J, Butler NR, et al. Predictors of birth weight in two national studies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983;90:107–12
   Google Scholar
• Raine T, Powell S, Krohn MA. The risk of repeating low birth weight and the role of prenatal care. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:485–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey CA, Cliver SP, McNeal SF, et al. Prenatal weight gain patterns and birth weight among non-obese black and white women. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:490–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittendorf R, Herschel M, Williams MA, et al. Reducing the frequency of low birth weight in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:1056–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakketeig LS, Hoffman HJ, Harley EE. The tendency to repeat gestational age and birth weight in successive births. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;135:1086–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones OW. Genetic factors in the determination of fetal size. J Reprod Med 1978;21:305–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik R. Maternal diseases associated with abnor- mal fetal growth. J Reprod Med 1978;21:315–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ounsted M, Moar VA, Scott A. Risk factors associ- ated with small-for-dates and large-for-dates infants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:226–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Visser GHA, Huisman A, Saathof PWF, et al. Early fetal growth retardation: obstetric background and recurrence rate. Obstet Gynecol 1986;67:40–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe HM, Gross TL, Sokol RJ. Recurrent small- for-gestational age birth. Perinatal risks and out- comes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157:288–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duverot JJ, Cheriex E, Pieters FAA, et al. Maternal volume homeostasis in early pregnancy in relation to fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:361–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salafia CM, Ernst LM, Pezzullo JC, et al. The very low-birthweight infant: maternal complications leading to preterm birth, placental lesions, and intrauterine growth. Am J Perinatol 1995;12:106–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson CB, Doubilet PM, Saltzman DH. Intrauterine growth retardation: predictive value of ultrasound criteria for antenatal diagnosis. Radiology 1986;160:415–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown HL, Miller JM, Gabert HA, et al. Ultrasonic recognition of the small-for-gestational age fetus. Obstet Gynecol 1987;69:631–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane JP, Lopta MM, Welt SI, et al. Abnormal fetal growth patterns: ultrasonic diagnosis and manage- ment. Obstet Gynecol 1977;50:205–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deter RL, Harrist RB, Hadlock FP, et al. The use of ultrasound in the detection of intrauterine growth retardation: a review. J Clin Ultrasound 1982;10:9–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deter RL, Hadlock FP, Harrist RB. Evaluation of normal fetal growth and the detection of intrauterine growth retardation. In Callen PW, ed. Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1983:113–40
   Google Scholar
• Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, et al. Sonographic detection of fetal intrauterine growth retardation. Perinatol Neonatol 1983;7:21–32
   Google Scholar
• Little D, Campbell S. Ultrasound evaluation of intrauterine growth retardation. Radiol Clin N Am 1982;20:335–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott WJ. Fetal femur length, neonatal crown–heel length and screening for IUGR. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65:460–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott WJ. The diagnosis of altered fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol CIin N Am 1988;15:237–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott WJ. Intrauterine growth restriction and Dopp- ler ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 2000;19:661–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJong CLD, Francis A, VanGeijn HP, Gardosi J. Customized fetal weight limits for antenatal detec- tion of fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:36–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GCS, Smith MFS, McNay MB, Fleming JEE. The relation between fetal abdominal circumfer- ence and birth weight: findings in 3512 pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:186–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dashe JS, McIntire DD, Lucas MJ, Leveno KJ. Effects of symmetric and asymmetric fetal growth on pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:321–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott WJ. Altered fetal growth. In Ott WJ, ed. Clinical Obstetrical Ultrasound. New York: Wiley-Less, 1999:229–62
   Google Scholar
• Soothill PW, Bobrow CS, Holmes RP. Small for gestational age is not a diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13:225–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craigo SD, Beach ML, Harvey-Wilkes KB, D’Alton ME. Ultrasound predictors of neonatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Perinatol 1996; 13:465–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, et al. Sono- graphic estimation of fetal weight. Radiology 1984;150:535–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott WJ, Doyle S, Flamm S, et al. Accurate ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight: prospective analysis of new ultrasonic formulae. Am J Perinatol 1986;3:307–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard MJ, Richards VA, Berkowitz RL, et al. An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;142:47–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favre R, Nisand G, Bettahar K, et al. Measurement of limb circumferences with three-dimensional ultra- sound for fetal weight estimation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993;3:176–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer RM, Medearis AL, Hirata GI, et al. The use of a neural network for the ultrasonographic estima- tion of fetal weight in the macrosomic fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:1467–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combs CA, Jaekle RK, Rosenn B, et al. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:365–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley NJ, Lamb MP, Copping C. A new method for fetal weight estimation using real-time ultrasound. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987;94:110–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abramowicz JS, Sherer DM, Bar-Tov E, et al. The cheek-to-cheek diameter in the ultrasonographic assessment of fetal growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:846–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill LM, Guzick D, Thomas ML, et al. Thigh circum- ference in the detection of intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Perinatol 1989;6:349–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalano PM, Tyzbir ED, Allen SR, et al. Evaluation of fetal growth by estimation of neonatal body composition. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:46–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumners JE, Findley GM, Ferguson KA. Evaluation methods for intrauterine growth using neonatal fat stores instead of birth weight as outcome measures: fetal and neonatal measurements correlated with neonatal skinfold thickness. J Clin Ultrasound 1990; 18:9–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berstein IM, Goran MI, Amini SB, et al. Differential growth of fetal tissues during the second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:28–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill IM, Guzick D, Doyles D, et al. Subcutaneous tissue thickness cannot be used to distinguish abnormalities of fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80:268–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardeil F, Greene R, Stuart B, et al. Subcutaneous fat in the fetal abdomen as a predictor of growth restric- tion. Obstet Gyencol 1999;94:209–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimondo P, Mirk P, LaBella A, et al. Sonographic estimation of fetal liver weight: an additional bio- metric parameter for assessment of fetal growth. J Ultrasound Med 1995;14:327–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senoh D, Hata T, Kitao M. Fetal liver length measurement does not provide a superior means for prediction of a small-for-gestational age fetus. Am J Perinatol 1994;11:344–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeye RL. Do placental weights have clinical signifi- cance? Hum Pathol 1987;18:387–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendricks CH. Patterns of fetal and placental growth: the second half of normal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1964;24:357–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf H, Oosting H, Treffers PE. Placental volume measurement by ultrasonography: evaluation of the method. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:1191–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geirsson RT, Ogston SA, Patel NB, et al. Growth of total intrauterine, intra-amniotic and placental volume in normal singleton pregnancy measured by ultrasound. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:46–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alfrevic Z, Neilson JP. Doppler ultrasonography in high-risk pregnancies: systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:1379–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divon MY. Randomized controlled trials of umbili- cal artery Doppler velocimetry: how many are too many? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;6:377–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divon MY. Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry: clinical utility in high-risk pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:10–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochelson B, Schulman H, Farmakides G, et al. The significance of absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery waveforms. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:1213–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divon MY, Girz BA, Lieblich R, et al. Clinical management of the fetus with markedly dimin- ished umbilical artery end diastolic flow. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:1523–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsdorp VHM, van Vugt JMG, van Geijn HP, et al. Clinical significance of absent or reverse end dia- stolic velocity waveforms in umbilical artery. Lancet 1994;344:1664–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valcomonico A, Danti L, Frusca T, et al. Absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery: risk of neonatal morbidity and brain damage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:796–801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs C, Macara LM, Leiser R, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction with absent end-diastolic flow velocity in the umbilical artery is associated with maldevelopment of the placental terminal villous tree. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1534–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles W, Ocallaghan S, Read M, et al. Placental nitric oxide synthase activity and abnormal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:49–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles W, Falconer J, Read M, et al. Ovine fetal umbili- cal artery Doppler systolic diastolic ratios and nitric oxide synthase. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:53–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLean M, Mathers A, Walker J, et al. The ultra- sonic assessment of discordant growth in twin preg- nancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992;2:30–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed K, Anderson C, Shenker L. Changes in intracardiac Doppler blood flow velocities in fetuses with absent umbilical artery diastolic flow. Am J Obstet Gynceol 1987;157:774–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandran R, Serra-Serra V, Sellers S, et al. Fetal cere- bral Doppler in the recognition of fetal compromise. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:139–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vyas S, Nicholaides K, Bower S, et al. Middle cerebral artery flow velocity waveforms in fetal hypoxemia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:797–803
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trudinger BJ, Giles WB, Cook CM, et al. Fetal umbili- cal artery flow velocity waveforms and placental resistance: clinical significance. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:23–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erskin RLA, Ritchie JWK. Umbilical artery blood flow characteristics in normal and growth-retarded fetuses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:605–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giles WB, Trudinger BJ, Baird PJ. Fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and placental resis- tance: pathological correlation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:31–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hitschold T, Weiss E, Beck T, et al. Low target birth weight or growth retardation? Umbilical Doppler flow velocity waveforms and histometric analysis of fetoplacental vascular tree. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:1260–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locci M, Nazzaro G, DePlacido G, et al. Correlation of Doppler and placental immunohistochemical features in normal and intrauterine growth- retarded fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993;3:240–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arduini D, Rizzo G, Romanini C, et al. Fetal blood flow velocity waveforms as predictors of growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:7–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischer A, Schulman H, Farmakides G, et al. Umbilical artery velocity waveforms and intra- uterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:502–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurin J, Lingman G, Marsal K, et al. Fetal blood flow in pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol 1987;69:895–902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCowan LM, Erskine LA, Ritchie K, et al. Umbili- cal artery Doppler blood flow studies in the preterm, small-for-gestational age fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:655–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wladimiroff JW, Wijngaard JAGW, Degani S, et al. Cerebral and umbilical arterial blood flow velocity waveforms in normal and growth-retarded preg- nancies. Obstet Gynecol 1987;69:705–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson CB, Doubilet PM. Doppler criteria for intrauterine growth retardation: predictive values. J Ultrasound Med 1988;7:655–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischer A, Guidetti D, Stuhlmuller P. Umbilical artery velocity waveforms in the intrauterine growth-retarded fetus. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1989; 32:660–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott WJ. Comparison of dynamic image and pulsed Doppler ultrasonography for the diagnosis of intra- uterine growth retardation. J Clin Ultrasound 1990; 18:3–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaziano EP, Knox H, Ferrera B, et al. Is it time to reassess the risk for the growth-retarded fetus with normal Doppler velocimetry of the umbilical artery? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:1734–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almstrom H, Axelsson O, Snattingius S, et al. Com- parison of umbilical artery velocimetry and cordiotocography for surveillance of small-for- gestational age fetuses. Lancet 1992;340:936–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devore GR. The effect of an abnormal umbilical artery Doppler on the management of fetal growth restriction: a survey of maternal–fetal medicine specialists who perform fetal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994;4:294–303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo JK, Liang ST, Chan FY. Middle cerebral artery Doppler flow velocity waveforms. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:613–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wladimiroff JW, Tonge HM, Sewart PA. Doppler ultrasound assessment of cerebral blood flow in the human fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986;93:471–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vyas S, Nicolaides KH, Bower S, et al. Middle cere- bral artery flow velocity waveforms in fetal hypoxemia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:797–803
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang SC, Chen CP, Chang FM, et al. Serial follow-up of abnormal flow velocity waveforms of dying fetus in case of chronic hypertension. J Clin Ultrasound 1993;21:537–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo G, Capponi A, Pietropolli LM, et al. Fetal cardiac and extracardiac flows preceding intra- uterine death. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994;4:139–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramellini D, Folli MC, Raboni S, et al Cerebral umbilical Doppler ratio as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:416–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon NV, Levisky JS, Shearer DM, et al. Predictive- ness of sonographic fetal weight estimation as a function of prior probability of intrauterine growth retardation. J Clin Ultrasound 1988;16:285–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warsof SL, Cooper DJ, Little D, et al. Routine ultra- sound screening for antenatal detection of intra- uterine growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 76:33–47
   Google Scholar
• Medearis A. The evaluation and interpretation of ultrasonic assessment of fetal growth. Semin Perinatol 1988;12:31–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell S, Bewley S, Cohen-Overbeek T. Investi- gation of the uteroplacental circulation by Doppler ultrasound. Semin Perinatol 1987;11:362–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott WJ. Value of fetal umbilical artery and carotid Doppler flow studies in the evaluation of suspected IUGR. J Matern Fetal Invest 1991;1:185–90
   Google Scholar
• Arias F. Accuracy of the middle cerebral-to-umbilical artery resistance index ratio in the prediction of neo- natal outcome in patients at high risk for fetal and neonatal complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171:1541–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akalin-Sel T, Nicolaides K, Peacock J, et al. Doppler dynamics and their complex interrelation with fetal oxygen pressure, carbon dioxide pressure, and pH in growth-retarded fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:439–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman E, Vintzileos A, Martins M. Relationship between middle cerebral artery velocimetry, com- puter fetal heart rate assessment and degree of acidemia at birth in intrauterine growth restricted fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:337
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo G, Arduini D, Romanini C. Doppler echo- cardiographic assessment of fetal cardiac function. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992;2:434–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVore G. The use of color Doppler imaging to examine the fetal heart: normal and pathologic anatomy. In Jaffe R, Warsof S, eds. Color Doppler Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc., 1991:121–54
   Google Scholar
• Wladimiroff J, Huisman T, Stewart P. Normal fetal arterial and venous flow-velocity waveforms in early and late gestation. In Jaffe R, Warsof S, eds. Color Doppler Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc., 1991:155–73
   Google Scholar
• Reed K. Venous flow velocities in the fetus. In Jaffe R, Warsof S, eds. Color Doppler Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc., 1991:175–81
   Google Scholar
• Appleton C, Hatle L, Popp R. Superior vena cava and hepatic vein Doppler echocardiography in healthy adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;10:1032–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuss M, Rudolph A, Dae M. Phasic blood flow patterns in the superior and inferior venae cavae and umbilical vein of fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;145:70–8
   Google Scholar
• Huisman T, van den Eijnde S, Stewart P, et al. Changes in inferior vena cava blood flow velocity and diameter during breathing movements in the human fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993;3:26–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed K, Appleton C, Anderson C, et al. Doppler studies of vena cava flows in human fetuses. Circula- tion 1990;81:498–505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indik J, Chen V, Reed K. Association of umbilical venous with inferior vena cava blood flow velo- cities. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:551–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo G, Capponi A, Talone PE, et al. Doppler indices from inferior vena cava and ductus venosus in predicting pH and oxygen tension in umbilical blood at cordocentesis in growth-retarded fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;7:401–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakai Y, Miyazaki Y, Masuoka Y. Pulsatile umbilical venous flow and its clinical significance. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:977–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitra SC. Umbilical venous Doppler waveform without fetal breathing: its significance. Am J Perinatol 1995;12:217–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed KL, Chaffin DG, Anderson CF. Umbilical venous Doppler velocity pulsations and inferior vena cava pressure elevations in fetal lambs. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:617–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington KF. Making best and appropriate use of fetal biophysical and Doppler ultrasound data in the management of the growth-restricted fetus. Ultra- sound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:399–401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogundipe EM, Wolfe CDA, Seed P, et al. Does the antenatal detection of small-for-gestational age babies influence their two-year outcomes? Am J Perinatol 2000;17:73–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar