Ultrasound evaluation of the multifetal gestation

References

• Luke B. The changing pattern of multiple births in the United States: maternal and infant character- istics, 1973 and 1990. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:101–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebire NJ, Souka A, Skentou H, et al. First trimester diagnosis of monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Ultra- sound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:223–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitkara U, Berkowitz RL. Assessment of multiple pregnancies. In Chervenak FA, Isaacson GC, Camp- bell S, eds. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co., 1993:413–20
   Google Scholar
• Roberts WE, Morrison JC, Hamer C. The incidence of preterm labor and specific risk factors. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:85S–9S
   Google Scholar
• Devoe LD, Ware DJ. Antenatal assessment of twin gestation. Semin Perinatol 1995;19:413–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chasen ST, Chervenak FA. What is the relationship between the universal use of ultrasound, the rate of detection of twins, and outcome differences? Clin Obstet Gynecol 1998;41:66–77
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hendrix NW, Chauhan SP. Sonographic examina- tion of twins. From first trimester to delivery of second fetus. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1998;25:609–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ewigman BG, Crane JP, Frigoletto FD, et al. Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. N Engl J Med 1993;329:821–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson PH, Kullander S. Long-term experience of general ultrasound screening in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;146:942–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spellacy WN, Handler A, Ferre CD. A case–control study of 1253 twin pregnancies from a 1982–1987 perinatal data base. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:168–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey RP, Taylor SN, Lu PY, et al. Spontaneous reduction of multiple pregnancy: incidence and effect on outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:77–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson DE, Wilson LS, Kossoff G. Shadowing and enhancement in ultrasonic echograms by reflection and refraction. J Clin Ultrasound 1981;9:181–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce G, Golding RH, Cooperberg PL. The effects of tissue velocity changes on acoustical interfaces. J Ultrasound Med 1982;1:185–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttery B, Davison G. The ghost artifact. J Ultra- sound Med 1984;3:49–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGillivray I. Epidemiology of twin pregnancy. Semin Perinatal 1986;10:4–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bomsel-Helmreich O, Al Mufti W. The mechanism of monozygosity and double ovulation. In Keith LG, Papiernik E, Keith DM, et al., eds. Multiple Pregnancy. Carnforth, UK: Parthenon Publishing, 1995
   Google Scholar
• Hrubec Z, Robinette CD. The study of human twins in medical research. N Engl J Med 1984;310:435–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benirschke K, Kim CK. Multiple pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1973;288:1276–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milham S. Pituitary gonadotrophin and dizygotic twinning. Lancet 1964;14:566
   Google Scholar
• Wenstrom KD, Syrop CH, Hammitt DG, et al. Increased risk of monochorionic twinning associated with assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 1993;60:510– 14
   Google Scholar
• Callen PW. Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecol- ogy. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co., 2000
   Google Scholar
• Sepulveda W. Chorionicity determination in twin pregnancies: double trouble? Ultrasound Obstet Gy- necol 1997;10:79–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson SF, Driscoll SG. Twin placentation and its complications. Semin Perinatol 1986;10:9–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dub´e J, Dodds L, Armson BA. Does chorionicity or zygosity predict adverse perinatal outcomes in twins? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:579–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebire NJ, Snijders RJ, Hughes K, et al. The hidden mortality of monochorionic twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:1203–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sepulveda W, Sebire NJ, Hughes K, et al. The lambda sign at 10–14 weeks of gestation as a predictor of chorionicity in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;7:421–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll SG, Soothill PW, Abdel-Fattah SA, et al. Prediction of chorionicity in twin pregnancies at 10– 14 weeks of gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;109:182–6
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse E, Hardwick C, Maharaj S, et al. Chorionicity determination in twin pregnancies: how accurate are we? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:350–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Alton ME, Dudley DK. The ultrasonographic prediction of chorionicity in twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:557–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barss VA, Benacerraf BR, Frigoletto FD. Ultrasono- graphic determination of chorion type in twin gestation. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:779–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn HN, Gabrielli S, Reece EA, et al. Ultrasono- graphic criteria for the prenatal diagnosis of placental chorionicity in twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:1540–2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stagiannis KD, Sepulveda W, Southwell D, et al. Ultrasonographic measurement of the dividing membrane in twin pregnancy during the second and third trimesters: a reproducibility study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:1546–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finberg HJ. The ‘twin peak’ sign: reliable evidence of dichorionic twinning. J Ultrasound Med 1992;11:571–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahony BS, Filly RA, Callen PW. Amnionicity and chorionicity in twin pregnancies: prediction using ultrasound. Radiology 1985;155:205–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabin B, Laurini RN, van Eyck J. Early prenatal diagnosis of cord entanglement in monoamniotic multiple pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13:181–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rode ME, Jackson M. Sonographic considerations with multiple gestation. Semin Roentgenol 1999;34:29–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning FA, Hill LM, Platt LD. Qualitative amniotic fluid determination by ultrasound: ante- partum detection of intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;139:254–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain PF, Manning FA, Morrison I, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume I. The relationship of marginal and decreased amniotic fluid volumes to perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;150:245–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain PF, Manning FA, Morrison I, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume II. The relationship of increased amniotic fluid to perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;150:250–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson WJ, Harlass FE, Menard MK, et al. Sono- graphic assessment of amniotic fluid in normal twin pregnancy. Am J Perinatol 1995;12:122–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau AC, Kjos SL, Kovacs BW. Ultrasonographic measurement of amniotic fluid volume in normal diamniotic twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1003–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith AP, Ong S, Smith NC. A prospective long- itudinal study of growth velocity in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:485–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divon MY, Weiner Z. Ultrasound in twin preg- nancy. Semin Perinatol 1995;19:404–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan JF, Vintzileos AM, Turner G, et al. Correlation of uterine fundal height with ultrasonic measure- ments in twin gestations. J Matern Fetal Med 1994; 3:18–22
   Google Scholar
• Ong S, Lim MN, Fitzmaurice A. The creation of twin centile curves for size. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;109:753–8
   Google Scholar
• Senoo M, Okamura K, Murotsuki J, et al. Growth pattern of twins of different chorionicity evaluated by sonographic biometry. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:656–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissman A, Achiron R, Lipitz S, et al. The first- trimester growth-discordant twin: an ominous prenatal finding. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:110–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton EF, Platt RW, Morin L, et al. How small is too small in a twin pregnancy? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:682–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson JE, Evans SF. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes from the Australian and New Zealand twin–twin transfusion syndrome registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:706–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urig MA, Clewell WH, Elliott JP. Twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163:1522–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruner JP, Rosemond RL. Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: a subset of the twin oligohydramnios– polyhydramnios sequence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169:925–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson EG, Neer KJ. Placental injection studies in twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;147:170–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blickstein I. The twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:714–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danskin FH, Neilson JP. Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: what are appropriate diagnostic criteria? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:365–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nores J, Athanassiou A, Elkadry E, et al. Gender differences in twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:580–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahony BS, Petty CN, Nyberg DA, et al. The ‘stuck twin’ phenomenon: ultrasonographic findings, preg- nancy outcome, and management with serial amniocenteses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:1513–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor MJ, Denbow ML, Duncan KR, et al. Antenatal factors at diagnosis that predict outcome in twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1023–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone FD, D’Alton ME. Anomalies peculiar to multiple gestations. Clin Perinatol 2000;27:1033–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soernes T, Bakke T. The length of the human umbilical cord in twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157:1229–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Little J, Bryan E. Congenital anomalies in twins. Semin Perinatol 1986;10:50–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burn J. Twins and twinning. In Chervenak FA, Isaacson GC, Campbell S, eds. Ultrasound in Ob- stetrics and Gynecology. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co., 1993:783–94
   Google Scholar
• Aggarwal N, Suri V, Saxena S, et al. Acardiac acephalus twins: a case report and review of literature. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81:983–4
   Google Scholar
• Arias F, Sunderji S, Gimpelson R, et al. Treatment of acardiac twinning. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:818–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanson JW. Incidence of conjoined twinning. Lancet 1975;2:1257
   Google Scholar
• van den Brand SF, Nijhuis JG, van Dongen PW. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of conjoined twins. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1994;49:656–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecolo- gists. Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 27. Washington, DC: ACOG, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Spencer K. Screening for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancies in the first trimester: does chorionicity impact on maternal serum free beta-hCG or PAPP-A levels? Prenat Diagn 2001;21:715–17
   Google Scholar