Ultrasonic measurements of the cervix and preterm labor

References

• McCormack MC. The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity. N Engl J Med 1985;312:82–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldenberg RL. The management of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:1020–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iams JD, Paraskos J, Landon MB, et al. Cervical sonography in preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:40–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paraskos J, Waxman M, Johnson F, et al. Ultrasound assessment of cervical length in preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:364
   Google Scholar
• To MS, Skentou C, Chan C, et al. Cervical assessment at the routine 23-week scan: standardiz- ing techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17:217–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen J, Yost N, Berghella V, et al. Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. J Am Med Assoc 2001;286:1340–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr DB, Smith K, Parsons L, et al. Ultrasonography for cervical length measurement: agreement be- tween transvaginal and translabial techniques. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:554–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicero S, Skentou C, Souka A, et al. Cervical length at 22–24 weeks of gestation: comparison of transva- ginal and transperineal–translabial ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17:335–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghella V, Kuhlman K, Weiner S, et al. Cervical funneling: sonographic criteria predictive of preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;10:161–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman ER, Walters C, Anath CV, et al. A comparison of sonographic cervical parameters in predicting spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singleton gestations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:204–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergelin I, Valentin L. Patterns of normal change in cervical length and width during pregnancy in nulliparous women: a prospective, longitudinal ultrasound study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18:217–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman ER, Vintzileos AM, McLean DA, et al. The natural history of a positive response to transfundal pressure in women at risk for cervical incompetence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:634–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald R, Smith P, Vyas S. Cervical incompe- tence: the use of transvaginal sonography to provide an objective diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:211–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabin B, Aardenburg R, van Eyck J. Maternal position and ultrasonic cervical assessment in multi- ple pregnancy. Preliminary observations. J Reprod Med 1997;42:719–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif LS, Shalan HM. Detection of pregnant women at risk of cervical incompetence by transva- ginal sonography during straining. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 1997;23:353–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bega G, Lev-Toaff A, Kuhlman K, et al. Three- dimensional multiplanar transvaginal ultrasound of the cervix in pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:351–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Heer I, Fuchshuber S, et al. Sonographic cervical volumetry in higher order multiple gesta- tion. Fetal Diagn Ther 2001;16:634–8
   Google Scholar
• Hoesli J, Surbek DV, Tercanli S, et al. Three dimensional volume measurement of the cervix during pregnancy compared to conventional 2D- sonography. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1999;64:115–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eganhouse DJ. A comparative study of variables differentiating false labor from early labor. J Perinatol 1991;11:249–57
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iams JD, Casal D, McGregor JA, et al. Fetal fibronectin improves the accuracy of diagnosis of preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:141–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakawa H, Utumi T, Hasagawa I, et al. Evalua- tion of threatened preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:829–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo G, Capponi A, Arduini D, et al. The value of fetal fibronectin in cervical and vaginal secretions and of ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix in predicting premature delivery for patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1146–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hincz P, Wilczynski J, Kozarzewski M, et al. Two- step test: the combined use of fetal fibronectin and sonographic examination of the uterine cervix for prediction of preterm delivery in symptomatic patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81:58–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Malagrida L, et al. Evaluat- ing the risk of preterm delivery: A comparison of fetal fibronectin and transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:196–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane JMG, Van den Hof F, Armson BA, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound in the prediction of pre- term delivery: singleton and twin gestations. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:357–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoi E, Akmal S, Rane S, et al. Ultrasound assessment of cervical length in threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:552–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekesin I, Hellmeyer L, Heller G, et al. Evaluation of quantitative ultrasound tissue characterization of the cervix and cervical length in the prediction of premature delivery for patients with sponta- neous preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189:532–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez R, Galasso M, Romero R, et al. Ultrasono- graphic examination of the uterine cervix is better than cervical digital examinations as predictor of the likelihood of preterm delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:956–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timor-Tritsch I, Boozarjomehri F, Masakowski Y, et al. Can a snapshot sagittal view of the cervix by transvaginal ultrasonography predict active preterm labor? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:990–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iams JD. Cervical ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;10:156–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berghella V, Kuhlman K, Weiner S, et al. Cervical funneling: sonographic criteria predictive of preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;10:161–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghella V, Tolosa JE, Kuhlman K, et al. Cervical ultrasonography compared with manual examina- tion as a predictor of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:723–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman ER, Pisatowski DM, Vintzileos AM, et al. A comparison of ultrasonographically detected cervical changes in responses to transfundal pressure, cough- ing, and standing in predicting cervical incompetence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:660–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrews WW, Copper R, Hauth JC, et al. Second trimester cervical ultrasound: association with increased risk for recurrent early spontaneous delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:222–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook CM, Ellwood DA. The cervix as a predictor of preterm delivery in ‘at risk’ women. Ultrasound Obstet Gyneco 2001;15:109–13
   Google Scholar
• Vendittelli F, Mamelle N, Munoz F, et al. Transva- ginal ultrasonography of the uterine cervix in hospitalized women with preterm labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001;72:117–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Obido AO, Berghella V, Reddy U, et al. Does transvaginal ultrasound of the cervix predict pre- term premature rupture of membranes in high-risk population? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:223–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guzman ER, Mellon C, Vintzileos AM, et al. Longitudinal assessment of endocervical canal length between 15 and 24 weeks’ gestation in women at risk for pregnancy loss or preterm birth: transfundal pressure, coughing, and standing in predicting cervical incompetence. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:31–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghella V, Talucci M, Desai A. Does transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length before 14 weeks predict preterm delivery in high-risk pregnancies? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:140–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen HF, Nugent CE, Wanty SD, et al. Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasono- graphic measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:859–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tongsong T, Kamprapanth P, Srisomboon J, et al. Single transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length early in the third trimester as a predictor of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:184–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med 1996;334:567–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath VCF, Southall TR, Souka AP, et al. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:312–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V. Sonographic measurement of uterine cervix at 18–22 weeks’ gestation and the risk of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:902– 7
   Google Scholar
• Hassan SS, Romero R, Berry SM, et al. Patients with an ultrasonographic cervical length 4 15 mm have nearly a 50% risk of early spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1458–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• To MS, Skentou C, Liao AW, et al. Cervical length and funneling at 23 weeks of gestation in the prediction of spontaneous early preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:200–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbard JU, Tart M, Moawad AH. Cervical length at 16–22 weeks’ gestation and risk for preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:972–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conoscenti G, Meir YJ, D’ Ottavio G, et al. Does cervical length at 13–15 weeks’ gestation predict preterm delivery in an unselected population? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:128–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho MHB, Bittar RE, Brizot ML, et al. Cervical length at 11–14 weeks’ and 22–24 weeks’ gestation evaluated by transvaginal sonography, and gesta- tional age at delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:135–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg RL, Iams JD, Miodovnik M, et al. The preterm prediction study: risk factors in twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1047–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imseis HM, Albert TA, Iams JD. Identifying twin gestations at low risk for preterm birth with a transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement at 24 to 26 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:1149–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman ER, Walters C, O’Reilly-Green C, et al. Use of cervical ultrasonography in prediction of sponta- neous preterm birth in twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1103–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JH, Kuhlman K, Daly S, et al. Prediction of preterm birth by second trimester cervical sonogra- phy in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:288–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skentou C, Souka AP, To MS, et al. Prediction of preterm delivery in twins by cervical assessment at 23 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17:7–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro JL, Kung R, Barrett JF. Cervical length as a predictor of pre-term birth in twin gestations. Twin Res 2000;3:213–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iams JD, Goldsmith LT, Weiss G. The preterm prediction study: maternal serum relaxin, sono- graphic cervical length, and spontaneous preterm birth in twins. J Soc Gynecol Invest 2001;8:39–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ong S, Smith A, Smith N, et al. Cervical length assessment in twin pregnancies using transvaginal ultrasound. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:851–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soriano D, Weisz B, Seidman DS, et al. The role of sonographic assessment of cervical length in the prediction of preterm birth in primigravidae with twin gestation conceived after infertility treatment. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81:39–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vayssiere C, Favre R, Audibert F, et al. Cervical length and funneling at 22 and 27 weeks to predict spontaneous birth before 32 weeks in twin preg- nancies: A French prospective multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:1596–604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramin KD, Ogburn PL, Mulholland TA, et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of cervical length in triplet pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:1442–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• To MS, Skentou C, Cicero S, et al. Cervical length at 23 weeks in triplets: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:515–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman ER, Walters C, O’Reilly-Green C, et al. Use of cervical ultrasonography in prediction of sponta- neous preterm birth in triplet gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1108–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maymon R, Herman A, Jauniaux E, et al. Transva- ginal sonographic assessment of cervical length changes during triplet gestation. Hum Reprod 2001;16:956–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlan SJ, Richmond LB, O’Brien WF. Randomized trial of endovaginal ultrasound in preterm prema- ture rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:458–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo G, Capponi E, Angelini A, et al. The value of transvaginal ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix in predicting preterm delivery in patients with preterm premature rupture of mem- branes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;11:23–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gire C, Faggianelli P, Nicaise C, et al. Ultrasono- graphic evaluation of cervical length in pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:565–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman ER, Rosenberg JC, Houlihan C, et al. A new method using vaginal ultrasound and tramsfundal pressure to evaluate the asymptomatic incompetent cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:248–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath VCF, Souka AP, Erasmus I, et al. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: the value of Shirodkar suture for the short cervix. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:318–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghella V, Daly SF, Tolosa JE, et al. Prediction of preterm delivery with transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix in patients with high-risk pregnancies: Does cerclage prevent prematurity? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:809–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbard JU, Snow J, Moawad AH. Short cervical length by ultrasound and cerclage. J Perinatol 2000;20:161–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasssan SS, Romero R, Maymon E, et al. Does cervical cerclage prevent preterm delivery in patients with a short cervix? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1325–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Connell MP, Lindow SW. Reversal of asympto- matic cervical length shortening with cervical cerclage: a preliminary study. Hum Reprod 2001;16:172–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dijkstra K, Funai EF, O’ Neil L, et al. Change in cervical length after cerclage as a predictor of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:346–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novy MJ, Gupta A, Wothe DD, et al. Cervical cerclage in the second trimester of pregnancy: a historical cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1447–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman RB, Krombach S, Myers MC, et al. Effect of cerclage on obstetrical outcome in twin gestations with a shortened cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:634–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust OA, Atlas RO, Jones KJ, et al. A randomized trial of cerclage versus no cerclage among patients with ultrasonographically detected second-trimester preterm dilatation of the internal os. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:830–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust OA, Atlas RO, Reed J, et al. Revisiting the short cervix detected by transvaginal ultrasound in the second trimester: Why cerclage therapy may not help. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1098–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, Hummel P, et al. Final results of the cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1106–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar