Quantification of adipose volume reduction with a prospective study analyzing the application of external radiofrequency energy and high voltage ultrashort pulse duration electrical fields

References

• Ingargiola M, Motakef S, Chung MT, Vasconez HC, Sasaki GH. Cryolipolysis for Fat Reduction and Body Contouring: Safety and Efficacy of Current Treatment Paradigm. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:1581–1590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang SL, Huang YL, Lee MC, Chang CH, Chung WH, Wu EH, Hu S. Combination therapy of focused ultrasound and radio-frequency for noninvasive body contouring in Asians with MRI photographic documentation. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29(1):165–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell ML, Baxter RA, Cox SE, Donofrio LM, Dover JS, Glogau RG, et al. Randomized sham-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a high-intensity focused ultrasounddevice for noninvasive body sculpting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:253–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatemi A. High-intensity focused ultrasound effectively reduces adipose tissue. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2009;28(4):257–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barta RJ, Hillard C, Bernstein D, Betker MR, Heinrich CA. Radio Frequency Therapy (Vanquish) Noninvasive Body Sculpting for Reduction of Abdominal Fat. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 136(4 Suppl):130. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000472444.62861.68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss RA. Noninvasive radio frequency for skin tightening and body contouring Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2013;32(1):9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avci P, Nyame TT, Gupta GK, Sadasivam M, Hamblin MR. Low-level laser therapy for fat layer reduction: a comprehensive review. Lasers Surg Med. 2013;45(6):349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elm CM, Wallander ID, Endrizzi B, Zelickson BD. Efficacy of a multiple diode laser system for body contouring. Lasers Surg Med. 2011;43(2):114–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachary CB, Saedi N, Allison J. The geometric model and fat reduction. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013;12(1):27–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen SR, Weiss ET, Brightman LA, Geronemus RG, Locke KW, Maytom MC, Dobak JD. Quantitation of the results of abdominal liposuction. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32(5):593–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auh S, Alam M. Quantification of non-invasive fat reduction: a systematic review. http://www.aslms.org/annualconference/documents/abstract9.pdf accessed 10-25-15.
   Google Scholar
• Saedi N, Kaminer M. New waves for fat reduction: high-intensity focused ultrasound Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2013;32(1):26–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy J, Verne S, Griffith R, Falto-Aizpurua L, Nouri K. Non-invasive subcutaneous fat reduction: a review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(9):1679–1688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraro GA, De Francesco F, Cataldo C, Rossano F, Nicoletti G, D’Andrea F. Synergistic effects of cryolipolysis and shock waves for noninvasive body contouring. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36(3): 666–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson DM, Kaminer MS, Baumann L, Burns AJ, Brauer JA, Jewell M, et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound for the reduction of subcutaneous adipose tissue using multiple treatment techniques. Lasers Surg Med. 2012;44(2):125–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shek SY, Chan NP, Chan HH. Non-invasive cryolipolysis for body contouring in Chinese–a first commercial experience. Lasers Surg Med. 2012;44(2):125–130. Erratum in: Lasers Surg Med. 2012; 44(5):435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein EF, Bloom JD, Basilavecchio LD, Plugis JM. Non-invasive fat reduction of the flanks using a new cryolipolysis applicator and overlapping, two-cycle treatments. Lasers Surg Med. 2014;46(10): 731–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger N, Mai SV, Luebberding S, Sadick NS. Cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2014;7:201–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tonucci LB, Mourão DM, Ribeiro AQ, Bressan J. Noninvasive body contouring: biological and aesthetic effects of low-frequency, low-intensity ultrasound device. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014;38(5): 959–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lach E. Reduction of subcutaneous fat and improvement in cellulite appearance by dual-wavelength, low-level laser energy combined with vacuum and massage. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2008;10(4):202–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud ELdesoky MT, Mohamed Abutaleb EE, Mohamed Mousa GS. Ultrasound cavitation versus cryolipolysis for non-invasive body contouring. Australas J Dermatol. 2015 Aug 24. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12386. [Epub ahead of print]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dierickx CC, Mazer JM, Sand M, Koenig S, Arigon V. Safety, tolerance, and patient satisfaction with noninvasive cryolipolysis. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(8):1209–1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisnic S, Divaris M, Nelson AA, Gharavi NM, Lask GP. A clinical and biological evaluation of a novel, noninvasive radiofrequency device for the long-term reduction of adipose tissue. Lasers Surg Med. 2014;46(2):94–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassar AH, Dorizas AS, Shafai A, Sadick NS. A randomized, controlled clinical study to investigate the safety and efficacy of acoustic wave therapy in body contouring. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(3):366–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingargiola MJ, Motakef S, Chung MT, Vasconez HC, Sasaki GH. Cryolipolysis for fat reduction and body contouring: safety and efficacy of current treatment paradigms. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 135(6):1581–1590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boey GE1, Wasilenchuk JL. Fat reduction in the inner thigh using a prototype cryolipolysis applicator. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(9): 1004–1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adatto MA, Adatto-Neilson RM, Morren G. Reduction in adipose tissue volume using a new high-power radiofrequency technology combined with infrared light and mechanical manipulation for body contouring. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29(5):1627–1631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarvazyan A, Tatarinov A, Sarvazyan N. Ultrasonics. Ultrasonic assessment of tissue hydration status. 2005;43(8):661–671.
   Google Scholar
• Galanakis CG, Daskalakis M, Manios A, Xyda A, Karantanas AH, Melissas J. Computed tomography-based assessment of abdominal adiposity changes and their impact on metabolic alterations following bariatric surgery. World J Surg. 2015;39(2):417–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makrogiannis S, Caturegli G, Davatzikos C, Ferrucci L. Acad Radiol. Computer-aided assessment of regional abdominal fat with food residue removal in CT. 2013;20(11):1413–1421.
   Google Scholar
• Onuma T, Kamishima T, Sasaki T, Sakata M. Absolute reliability of adipose tissue volume measurement by computed tomography: application of low-dose scan and minimal detectable change–a phantom study. Radiol Phys Technol. 2015;8(2):312–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi A, Zoico E, Goodpaster BH, Sepe A, Di Francesco V, Fantin F, et al. Quantification of intermuscular adipose tissue in the erector spinae muscle by MRI: agreement with histological evaluation. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010;18(12):2379–2384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding X, Terzopoulos D, Diaz-Zamudio M, Berman DS, Slomka PJ, Dey D. Automated pericardium delineation and epicardial fat volume quantification from noncontrast CT. Med Phys. 2015;42(9): 5015–5026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y, Udupa JK, Torigian DA. Optimization of abdominal fat quantification on CT imaging through use of standardized anatomic space: a novel approach. Med Phys. 2014;41(6):063501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holstila M, Virtanen KA, Grönroos TJ, Laine J, Lepomäki V, Saunavaara J, et al. Measurement of brown adipose tissue mass using a novel dual-echo magnetic resonance imaging approach: a validation study. Metabolism. 2013;62(8):1189–1198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell ML, Baxter RA, Cox SE, Donofrio LM, Dover JS, Glogau RG, et al. Randomized sham-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a high-intensity focused ultrasounddevice for noninvasive body sculpting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(1): 253–262.
   Google Scholar
• Hu HH, Chen J, Shen W. Segmentation and quantification of adipose tissue by magnetic resonance imaging. MAGMA. 2015 Sep 4. [Epub ahead of print]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reeds DN, Mohammed BS, Klein S, Boswell CB, Young VL. Metabolic and structural effects of phosphatidylcholine and deoxycholate injections on subcutaneous fat: a randomized, controlled trial. Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33(3):400–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulick MI. Evaluation of a noninvasive, dual-wavelength laser-suction and massage device for the regional treatment of cellulite. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(6):1788–1796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki GH. Quantification of human abdominal tissue tightening and contraction after component treatments with 1064-nm/1320-nm laser-assisted lipolysis: clinical implications. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30(2):239–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiBernardo BE. Randomized, blinded split abdomen study evaluating skin shrinkage and skin tightening in laser-assisted liposuction versus liposuction control. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30(4):593–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan DI. Improving outcomes in upper arm liposuction: adding radiofrequency-assisted liposuction to induce skin contraction. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32(1):84–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson L, Stewart KJ. Psychological morbidity and facial volume in HIV lipodystrophy: quantification of treatment outcome. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(4):439–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garibyan L, Sipprell WH 3rd, Jalian HR, Sakamoto FH, Avram M, Anderson RR. Three-dimensional volumetric quantification of fat loss following cryolipolysis. Lasers Surg Med. 2014;46(2):75–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar