233
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Prediction of the date of delivery based on first trimester ultrasound measurements: An independent method from estimated date of conception

, , , &
Pages 1-9 | Received 12 Apr 2009, Accepted 29 May 2009, Published online: 11 Dec 2009

References

  • Hollis B. Prolonged pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002;14:203–207.
  • Dobak WJ, Gardner MO. Late preterm gestation: physiology of labor and implications for delivery. Clin Perinatol 2006;33:765–776; abstract vii.
  • Saari-Kemppainen A, Karjalainen O, Ylostalo P, Heinonen OP. Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy. The Helsinki ultrasound trial. Lancet 1990;336:387–391.
  • Savitz DA, Terry JW Jr, Dole N Jr, Thorp JM, Siega-Riz AM, Herring AH. Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:1660–1666.
  • Gardosi J. Dating of pregnancy: time to forget the last menstrual period. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:367–368.
  • Tunon K, Eik-Nes SH, Grottum P, Von During V, Kahn JA. Gestational age in pregnancies conceived after in vitro fertilization: a comparison between age assessed from oocyte retrieval, crown-rump length and biparietal diameter. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:41–46.
  • Grange G, Pannier E, Goffinet F, Cabrol D, Zorn JR. Dating biometry during the first trimester: accuracy of an every-day practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000;88:61–64.
  • Daya S. Accuracy of gestational age estimation by means of fetal crown-rump length measurement. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168(Part 1):903–908.
  • Robinson HP. Sonar measurement of fetal crown-rump length as means of assessing maturity in first trimester of pregnancy. Br Med J 1973;4:28–31.
  • Robinson HP, Fleming JE. A critical evaluation of sonar “crown-rump length” measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975;82:702–710.
  • Wisser J, Dirschedl P, Krone S. Estimation of gestational age by transvaginal sonographic measurement of greatest embryonic length in dated human embryos. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994;4:457–462.
  • Gjessing HK, Grottum P, Eik-Nes SH. A direct method for ultrasound prediction of day of delivery: a new, population-based approach. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:19–27.
  • Salomon LJ, Pizzi C, Gasparrini A, Bernard JP, Ville Y. Predictions of the median interval in days between first trimester ultrasound examination and delivery. In: 17th World Congress on Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florence, Italy; 2007.
  • Yu K, Lu Z. Quantile regression: application and current research areas. The Statistician 2003;53:331–350.
  • Hastie T, Tibshitani R. Generalized additive models. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall Inc.; 1990.
  • Harrell F. Regression modeling strategies with applications to linear models, logistic regression and survival analysis. New-York: Springer-Verlag; 2001.
  • Chervenak FA, Skupski DW, Romero R, Myers MK, Smith-Levitin M, Rosenwaks Z, Thaler HT. How accurate is fetal biometry in the assessment of fetal age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:678–687.
  • Saltvedt S, Almstrom H, Kublickas M, Reilly M, Valentin L, Grunewald C. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 or 15-20 weeks of gestation? A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in a population of in-vitro fertilized pregnancies randomized to early or late dating scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;24:42–50.
  • Crowther CA, Kornman L, O'Callaghan S, George K, Furness M, Willson K. Is an ultrasound assessment of gestational age at the first antenatal visit of value? A randomised clinical trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106:1273–1279.
  • Snijders RJ, Johnson S, Sebire NJ, Noble PL, Nicolaides KH. First-trimester ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;7:216–226.
  • Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V. Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:189–194.
  • Altman DG, Chitty LS, Charts of fetal size: 1. Methodology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;101:29–34.
  • Bamberg C, Kalache KD. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;9:387–394.
  • Balcazar H, Haas J. Classification schemes of small-for-gestational age and type of intrauterine growth retardation and its implications to early neonatal mortality. Early Hum Dev 1990;24:219–230.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.