161
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Second stage caesarean section at a tertiary hospital in South Africa

, &
Pages 1151-1155 | Received 03 Jul 2009, Accepted 05 Jan 2010, Published online: 17 Mar 2010

References

  • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The national Sentinel C/S Audit Report; 2001. www.rcog.org.uk/resources/public/pdf/nscs audit.pdf
  • Moodliar M, Moodley J. Complications following caesarean delivery at King Edward VIII Hospital, Durban, South Africa. Obstet Gynaecol Forum 2004;14:21–26.
  • World Health Organisation. Maternal mortality a global fact book. Geneva: WHO; 1991. pp 3–16.
  • World Health Organisation. Maternal mortality in 2000. Geneva: WHO; 2000.
  • DiMatteo MR, Morton SC, Lepper HS, Damush TM, Carney MF, Pearson M, Kahn KL. Cesarean childbirth and psychosocial outcomes: a meta-analysis. Health Psychology. NHS Centre Rev Dissemin 1996;15:303–314.
  • Nielson TF, Hokegard KH. C/S and intra-operative surgical complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984;63:103–108.
  • Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, Landon MB, Gilbert S, Spong GS, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, et al Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary caesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labour. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:917–921.
  • Allen VM, O'Connell CM, Baskett TF. Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;112:986–990.
  • Altman MR, Lyndon-Rochelle MT. Prolonged second stage of labour and risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. Birth 2006;33:4.
  • Cebekulu L, Buchmann EJ. Complications associated with C/S in the second stage of labour. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006;95:110–114.
  • Selo-Ojeme S, Sathiyathasan S, Faygaz M. Caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation versus caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour: comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008;278:245–249.
  • Bofill JA, Rust OA, Perry KG, Roberts WE, Martin RW, Morrison JC. Operative vaginal delivery: a survey of fellows of ACOG. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:1007–1010.
  • Fasubaa OB, Ezechi OC, Orji EO, Ogunniyi SO, Akidele ST, Loto OM, Okogbo FO. Delivery of the impacted head of the fetus at C/S after prolonged obstructed labour: a randomised comparative study of two methods. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;22:375–378.
  • Singh M, Varma R. Reducing complications associated with a deeply engaged head at C/S: a simple instrument. New Dev 2008;1038–1041. www.rcog.org.uk/togonline

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.