References
- Wennberg JE, Gittelsohn A. Health care delivery in Maine I: patterns of use of common surgical procedures. J Maine Med Assoc 1975;66:123–130, 149.
- Lewis S. Another day, another variation: when is enough enough? Can Med Assoc J 1998;158:61–62.
- Fisher ES. Medical care – is more always better? N Engl J Med 2003;349:1665–1667.
- Fisher ES, Welch HG. Avoiding the unintended consequences of growth in medical care: how might more be worse? J Am Med Assoc 1999;281:446–453.
- Glantz JC. Cesarean delivery risk adjustment for regional interhospital comparisons. Am J of Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:1425–1431.
- Glantz JC. Labor induction rate variation in upstate New York: what is the difference? Birth 2003;30:168–174.
- Glantz JC, Guzick DS. Can differences in labor induction rates be explained by case mix? J Reprod Med 2004;49:175–181.
- McKenzie L, Stephenson PA. Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State. Am J Public Health 1993;83:1109–1112.
- Centers for Disease Control. Births: final data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2009;57:1–104.
- Bailit JL, Garrett JM, Miller WC, McMahon MJ, Cefalo RC. Hospital primary cesarean delivery rates and the risk of poor neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:721–727.
- Mascarenhas L, Eliot BW, Mackenzie IZ. A comparison of perinatal outcome, antenatal and intrapartum care between England and Wales, and France. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:955–958.
- Nicholson JM, Parry S, Caughey AB, Rosen S, Keen A, Macones GA. The impact of the active management of risk in pregnancy at term on birth outcomes: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:511.e1–511.e15.
- Roohan PJ, Josberger RE, Acar J, Dabir P, Feder HM, Gagliano PJ. Validation of birth certificate data in New York State. J Commun Health 2003;28:335–346.
- Librero J, Peiro S, Calderon SM. Inter-hospital variations in caesarean sections. A risk adjusted comparison in the Valencia public hospitals. J Epidemiol Commun Health 2000;54:631–636.
- Glantz JC. Term labor induction compared with expectant management. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:70–76.
- Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL. Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:600–607.
- Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:698–704.
- Gulmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(4):CD004945.
- Laye MR, Dellinger EH. Timing of scheduled cesarean delivery in patients on a teaching versus private service: adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:577–582; discussion 582–574.
- Zdeb MS, Therriault GD, Logrillo VM. Cesarean sections in upstate New York, 1968–1978. Am J Epidemiol 1980;112:395–403.
- Srinivas SK, Fager C, Lorch SA. Evaluating risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rate as a measure of obstetric quality. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:1007–1013.
- Gould JB, Danielsen B, Korst LM, Phibbs R, Chance K, Main E, Wirtschafter DD, Stevenson DK, the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative. Cesarean delivery rates and neonatal morbidity in a low-risk population. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:11–19.
- Bailit JL, Gregory KD, Reddy UM, Gonzalez-Quintero VH, Hibbard JU, Ramirez MM, Branch DW, Burkman R, Haberman S, Hatjis GG, et al Maternal and neonatal outcomes by labor onset type and gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:245 e241–245 e212.