995
Views
38
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Why women request cesarean section without medical indication?

, , , , &
Pages 1133-1137 | Received 07 Sep 2010, Accepted 27 Sep 2010, Published online: 13 Jun 2011

References

  • NIH Consensus and State-of-the-Science Statements on Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 2006;23:1–29.
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 386 November 2007: cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1209–1212.
  • Schenker JG, Cain JM. FIGO Committee Report: FIGO Committee for the ethical aspects of human reproduction and women's health. International federation of gynecology and obstetrics. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999;64:317–322.
  • Recommendations on Ethical Issues in Obstetrics and Gynecology by the FIGO Committee for Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health. London, UK: FIGO; 2003 Electronic Citation. http://www.figo.org/content/PDF/ethicsguidelines-text_2003.pdf . Last accessed 22 February 2006.
  • Wax JR, Cartin A, Pinette MG, Blackstone J. Patient choice cesarean: an evidence-based review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2004;59:601–616.
  • Coleman VH, Lawrence H, Schulkin J. Rising cesarean delivery rates the impact of cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2009;64:115–119.
  • Andrist LC. The implications of objectification theory for women's health: menstrual suppression and “Maternal Request” cesarean delivery. Health Care Women Int 2008;29:551–565.
  • Gossman GL, Joesch JM, Tanfer K. Trends in maternal request cesarean delivery from 1991 to 2004. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1506–1516.
  • Surgery and patient choice. In: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2004, ACOG Committee on Ethics. Committee Opinion No. 289. Surgery and patient choice: the ethics of decision making. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1101–1106.
  • Harer WB Jr. Elective cesarean: an option for primiparas? OBG Manag 2002;14:38–44.
  • Bettes BA, Coleman VH, Zinberg S, Spong CY, Portnoy B, DeVoto E, Schulkin J. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetrician-gynecologists' knowledge, perception, and practice patterns. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:57–66.
  • Gunnervik C, Sydsjö G, Sydsjö A, Selling KE, Josefsson A. Attitudes towards cesarean section in a nationwide sample of obstetricians and gynecologists. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87:438–444.
  • Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk NM. Survey of obstetricians' personal preference and discretionary practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997;73:1–4.
  • Wright JB, Wright AL, Simpson NA, Bryce FC. A survey of trainee obstetricians preferences for childbirth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;97:23–25.
  • Habiba M, Kaminski M, Da Fr柍, Marsal K, Bleker O, Librero J, Grandjean H, Gratia P, Guaschino S, Heyl W, Taylor D, Cuttini M. Caesarean section on request: a comparison of obstetricians attitudes in eight European countries. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2006;113:647–656.
  • Bergholt T, O'Østberg B, Legarth J, Weber T. Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective caesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83:262–266.
  • Backe B, Salversen KA, Sviggum O. Norwegian obstetricians prefer vaginal route of delivery. Lancet 2002;59:629.
  • Zhang J, Liu Y, Meikle S, Zheng J, Sun W, Li Z. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in Southeast China. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:1077–1082.
  • Mancuso A, De Vivo A, Fanara G, Albiero A, Priolo AM, Giacobbe A, Franchi M. Caesarean section on request: are there loco-regional factors influencing maternal choice? An Italian experience. J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;28:382–385.
  • Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF. Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology. Semin Perinatol 2006;30:235–241.
  • Thurman AR, Zoller JS, Swift SE. Non-pregnant patients' preference for delivery route. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2004;15:308–312.
  • Hildingsson I, Radestad I, Rubertsson C, Waldenstrom U. Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;109:618–623.
  • Chong ES, Mongelli M. Attitudes of Singapore women toward cesarean and vaginal deliveries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003;80:189–194.
  • Chigbu CO, Ezeome IV, Iloabachie GC. Cesarean section on request in a developing country. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2007;96:54–56.
  • Feldman GB, Freiman JA. Prophylactic cesarean at term? N Engl J Med 1985;312:1264–1267.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.