368
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Induction of labor and pain: a randomized trial between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix

, , , , &
Pages 728-731 | Received 01 Dec 2010, Accepted 17 Jan 2011, Published online: 25 Feb 2011

References

  • Coonrod DV, Bay RC, Kishi GY. The epidemiology of labor induction: Arizona 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;18: 1355–1362.
  • Bolnick JM, Velazquez MD, Gonzalez JL, Rappaport VJ, McIlwain-Dunivan G, Rayburn WF. Randomized trial between two active labor management protocols in the presence of an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:124–128.
  • Hofmeyr GJ. Induction of labour with an unfavourable cervix. Best Practice & Res Clin Obstet & Gynaecol 2003;17:777–794.
  • National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Induction of labour. 2008. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG070FullGuideline.pdf via the INTERNET [Accessed 29 January 2010].
  • Keirse MJNC. Natural prostaglandins for induction of labor and preinduction cervical ripening. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49: 609–626.
  • Lyrenäs S, Clason I, Ulmsten U. In vivo controlled release of PGE2 from a vaginal insert (0.8 mm, 10 mg) during induction of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001;108:169–178.
  • Tukey JW. Exploratory data analysis. MA,USA: Addison-Wesley.Reading; 1977.
  • Capogna G, Parpaglioni R, Lyons G, Columb M, Celleno D. Minimum analgesic dose of epidural sufentanil for first-stage labor analgesia. A comparison between spontaneous and prostaglandin-induced labors in nulliparous women. Anesthesiology 2001;94:740–744.
  • Smith CV, Rayburn WF, Miller AM. Intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and initiation of labor. Comparison of a multidose gel and single, controlled-release pessary. J Reprod Med 1994;39:381–384.
  • Denoual-Ziad C, Hors Y, Delande I. Comparaison de l'efficacitè entre dispositif intravaginal et gel vaginal de dinoprostone dans la maturation cervicale à terme en pratique quotidienne. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2005;34:62–68.
  • Marconi AM, Bozzetti P, Morabito A, Pardi G. Comparing two dinoprostone agents for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;138:135–140.
  • Kalkat RK, Mc Millan E, Cooper H, Palmer K. Comparison of dinoprostone slow release pessary (Propess) with gel (Prostin) for induction of labour at term-a randomised trial. J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;28:695–699.
  • El-Shawarby SA, Connell RJ. Induction of labour at term with vaginal prostaglandins preparations: a randomised controlled trial of Prostin vs Propess. J Obstet Gynaecol 2006;26:627–630.
  • Hughes EG, Kelly AJ, Kavanagh J. Dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:847–855.
  • Grignaffini A, Soncini E, Anfuso S, Ronzoni E. Dinoprostone: insert vaginale a lento rilascio (Propess) e gel intracervicale (Prepidil) nell'induzione del travaglio di parto con Bishop score sfavorevole. Minerva Ginecol 2004;56:413–418.
  • Ottinger WS, Menard MK, Brost BC. A randomized clinical trial of prostaglandin E2 intracervical gel and a slow release vaginal pessary for preinduction cervical ripening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:349–353.
  • Strobelt N, Meregalli V, Ratti M, Mariani S, Zani G, Morana S. Randomized study on removable PGE2 vaginal insert versus PGE2 cervical gel for cervical priming and labor induction in low-Bishop-score pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol 2006;85:302–305.
  • Arduini M, Giri C, Giannone L, Giannone E. “Prepidil versus Propess”: induzione farmacologica del travaglio di parto con dinoprostone. Minerva Ginecol 2008;60:127–133.
  • Triglia MT, Palamara F, Lojacono A, Prefumo F, Frusca T. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score ≤4. Acta Obstet Gynecol 2010;89:651–657.
  • Chyu JK, Strassner HT. Prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening: a randomized comparison of Cervidil versus Prepidil. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:606–611.
  • Vollebregt A, van't Hof DB, Exalto N. Prepidil ® compared to Propess ® for cervical ripening. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002;104:116–119.
  • Facchinetti F, Venturini P, Verocchi G, Volpe A. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005;119:189–193.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.