Effects of intentional delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 28 and 34 weeks of gestation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Lee T, Silver H. Etiology and epidemiology of preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Clin Perinatol 2001;28:721–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer BM. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:178–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aagaard-Tillery KM, Nuthalapaty FS, Ramsey PS, Ramin KD. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: perspectives surrounding controversies in management. Am J Perinatol 2005;22:287–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simhan HN, Canavan TP. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: diagnosis, evaluation and management strategies. BJOG 2005;112 Suppl 1:32–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Myhr TL, Wang EE, et al. Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM Study Group. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1005–1010.
   Google Scholar
• Shalev E, Peleg D, Eliyahu S, Nahum Z. Comparison of 12- and 72-hour expectant management of premature rupture of membranes in term pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:766–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natale R, Milne JK, Campbell MK, Potts PG, Webster K, Halinda E. Management of premature rupture of membranes at term: randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:936–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dare M, Middleton P, Crowther C, Flenady V, Varatharaju B. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;1:CD005302.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan SL, Crowther CA, Levett KM, Middleton P, Morris J. Planned early birth versus expectant management with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 week’s gestation for improving pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;3:CD004735.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey PS, Nuthalapaty FS, Lu G, Ramin S, Nuthalapaty ES, Ramin KD. Contemporary management of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM): a survey of maternal-fetal medicine providers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:1497–1502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy AJ, Veille JC, Sciscione A, McNutt LA, Dexter SC; Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine. The timing of elective delivery in preterm premature rupture of the membranes: a survey of members of the Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:1479–1481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan S, Crowther C, Morris J. Preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes: a survey of current practice. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;44:400–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Ham DP, Nijhuis JG, Mol BW, van Beek JJ, Opmeer BC, Bijlenga D, Groenewout M, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks (the PPROMEXIL-trial). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2007;7:11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naef RW 3rd, Allbert JR, Ross EL, Weber BM, Martin RW, Morrison JC. Premature rupture of membranes at 34 to 37 weeks’ gestation: aggressive versus conservative management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:126–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartling L, Chari R, Friesen C, Vandermeer B, Lacaze-Masmonteil T. A systematic review of intentional delivery in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006;19:177–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moretti M, Sibai BM. Maternal and perinatal outcome of expectant management of premature rupture of membranes in the midtrimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;159:390–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botet F, Cararach V, Sentis J. Premature rupture of membranes in early pregnancy. Neonatal prognosis. J Perinat Med 1994;22:45–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauleur C, Rochigneux S, Seffert P, Chene G, Billiemaz K, Collet F. Neonatal outcomes and four-year follow-up after spontaneous or iatrogenic preterm prelabor rupture of membranes before 24 weeks. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88:801–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermillion ST, Soper DE, Bland ML, Newman RB. Effectiveness of antenatal corticosteroid administration after preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:925–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattinson RC, Makin JD, Funk M, Delport SD, Macdonald AP, Norman K, Kirsten G, et al. The use of dexamethasone in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes–a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. Dexiprom Study Group. S Afr Med J 1999;89:865–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding JE, Pang J, Knight DB, Liggins GC. Do antenatal corticosteroids help in the setting of preterm rupture of membranes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:131–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 1999;354:1896–1900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson SG, Sharp SJ. Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods. Stat Med 1999;18:2693–2708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dear K, Begg C. An approach to assessing publication bias prior to performing a meta-analysis. Stat Sci 1992;7:237–245.
   Google Scholar
• Garite TJ, Freeman RK, Linzey EM, Braly PS, Dorchester WL. Prospective randomized study of corticosteroids in the management of premature rupture of the membranes and the premature gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;141:508–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iams JD, Talbert ML, Barrows H, Sachs L. Management of preterm prematurely ruptured membranes: a prospective randomized comparison of observation versus use of steroids and timed delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:32–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson LH, Meis PJ, Hatjis CG, Ernest JM, Dillard R, Schey HM. Premature rupture of membranes: a prospective, randomized evaluation of steroids, latent phase, and expectant management. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:55–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox SM, Leveno KJ. Intentional delivery versus expectant management with preterm ruptured membranes at 30-34 weeks’ gestation. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:875–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eroiz-Hernández J, Trejo-Acuña MA, Alvarez-Tarín MH. [Conservative management of premature membrane rupture in pregnancy of 28-34 weeks. Aleatory clinical trial]. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1997;65:43–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pasquier JC, Bujold E. A systematic review of intentional delivery in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007;20:567–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colditz GA, Miller JN, Mosteller F. How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. I: Medical. Stat Med 1989;8:441–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu YW, Escobar GJ, Grether JK, Croen LA, Greene JD, Newman TB. Chorioamnionitis and cerebral palsy in term and near-term infants. JAMA 2003;290:2677–2684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar