Labor induction with prostaglandin E2: characteristics of response and prediction of failure

References

• Humphrey T, Tucker JS. Rising rates of obstetric interventions: exploring the determinants of induction of labour. J Public Health (Oxf) 2009;31:88–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rayburn WF, Zhang J. Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:164–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly AJ, Malik S, Smith L, Kavanagh J, Thomas J. Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:CD003101.
   Google Scholar
• Güngördük K, Asicioglu O, Besimoglu B, Güngördük OC, Yildirm G, Ark C, Sahbaz A. Labor induction in term premature rupture of membranes: comparison between oxytocin and dinoprostone followed 6 hours later by oxytocin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:60.e1–60.e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triglia MT, Palamara F, Lojacono A, Prefumo F, Frusca T. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010;89:651–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper LM, Caughey AB, Odibo AO, Roehl KA, Zhao Q, Cahill AG. Normal progress of induced labor. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:1113–1118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesewetter B, Lehner R. Maternal outcome monitoring: induction of labor versus spontaneous onset of labor—a retrospective data analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;286:37–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petrou S, Taher S, Abangma G, Eddama O, Bennett P. Cost-effectiveness analysis of prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labour at term. BJOG 2011;118:726–734.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crane JM. Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:573–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonen R, Degani S, Ron A. Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score. Eur J Ultrasound 1998;7:183–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reis FM, Gervasi MT, Florio P, Bracalente G, Fadalti M, Severi FM, Petraglia F. Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1361–1367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrix NW, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC, Magann EF, Martin JN Jr, Devoe LD. Bishop score: a poor diagnostic test to predict failed induction versus vaginal delivery. South Med J 1998;91:248–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan PC, Suguna S, Vallikkannu N, Hassan J. Ultrasound and clinical predictors for Caesarean delivery after labour induction at term. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2006;46:505–509.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bertossa P, Novakov Mikic A, Stupar ZT, Milatovic S, Boulvain M, Irion O, de Tejada BM. Validity of clinical and ultrasound variables to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:53–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira C, Lunet N, Rodrigues T, Barros H. The Bishop Score as a determinant of labour induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;286:739–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon F, Wijesiriwardana A, Jonker L. Maternal and prenatal factors influencing the outcome of prostaglandin E2 induced labour. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;31:220–223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bortolus R. Determinants of response to intracervical prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening. Gruppo di Studio sull’Induzione del Travaglio di Parto. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999;87:137–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane JM, Delaney T, Butt KD, Bennett KA, Hutchens D, Young DC. Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;15:319–323.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peregrine E, O’Brien P, Omar R, Jauniaux E. Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:227–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabiru W, Raynor BD. Obstetric outcomes associated with increase in BMI category during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:928–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pevzner L, Rayburn WF, Rumney P, Wing DA. Factors predicting successful labor induction with dinoprostone and misoprostol vaginal inserts. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:261–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyar Y, Erbay G, Demir BC, Baytur Y. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009;280:357–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam WH, Tai SM, Rogers MS. Prediction of cervical response to prostaglandin E2 using fetal fibronectin. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:861–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuutila M, Hiilesmaa V, Kärkkäinen T, Ylikorkala O, Rutanen EM. Phosphorylated isoforms of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in the cervix as a predictor of cervical ripeness. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:243–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra S, Crane JM, Hutchens D, Young DC. Transvaginal ultrasound and digital examination in predicting successful labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:2–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston TA, Greer IA, Kelly RW, Calder AA. Plasma prostaglandin metabolite concentrations in normal and dysfunctional labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:483–488.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Roos C, Arabin B, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GH. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:213–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitarello PD, Tadashi Yoshizaki C, Ruano R, Zugaib M. Prediction of successful labor induction using transvaginal sonographic cervical measurements. J Clin Ultrasound 2012 Apr 25. doi: 10.1002/jcu.21929. [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 22532400.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung CW, Leung TY, Sahota DS, Chan OK, Chan LW, Fung TY, Lau TK. Outcome of induction of labour using maternal characteristics, ultrasound assessment and biochemical state of the cervix. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;23:1406–1412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar