The effect of customized growth charts on the identification of large for gestational age newborns

References

• Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Cooper C, Thornburg KL. Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. N Engl J Med 2008;359:61–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oken E. Maternal and child obesity: the causal link. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2009;36:361–77, ix.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plagemann A, Harder T, Dudenhausen JW. Childhood obesity, other cardiovascular risk factors, and premature death. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1840–1; author reply 1841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:163–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González González NL, Goya M, Bellart J, Lopez J, Sancho MA, Mozas J, Medina V, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcome in women with twin pregnancy and gestational diabetes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:1084–1089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz R, Teramo KA. What is the significance of macrosomia? Diabetes Care 1999;22:1201–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner WE, Edelman DA, Hendricks CH. A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976;126:555–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardosi J, Chang A, Kalyan B, Sahota D, Symonds EM. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet 1992;339:283–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardosi J, Mongelli M, Wilcox M, Chang A. An adjustable fetal weight standard. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;6:168–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardosi J. Intrauterine growth restriction: new standards for assessing adverse outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009;23:741–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The investigation and management of the small for gestational age fetus. Guidelines N° 31, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, Grewal J, Neta G, Klebanoff M. Prenatal application of the individualized fetal growth reference. Am J Epidemiol 2011;173:539–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santamaría R, Verdú LI, Martín C, García G. Tablas españolas de pesos neonatales según edad gestacional. Lab. Menarini 1998. Spanish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology; www.sego.es.
   Google Scholar
• Figueras F, Meler E, Iraola A, Eixarch E, Coll O, Figueras J, Francis A, et al. Customized birthweight standards for a Spanish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;136:20–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin JC, Speer PD, Simhan HN. A customized standard of large size for gestational age to predict intrapartum morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:499.e1–499.10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukowski R, Uchida T, Smith GC, Malone FD, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, et al.; First and Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk (FASTER) Research Consortium. Individualized norms of optimal fetal growth: fetal growth potential. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:1065–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardosi J, Clausson B, Francis A. The value of customised centiles in assessing perinatal mortality risk associated with parity and maternal size. BJOG 2009;116:1356–1363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausson B, Gardosi J, Francis A, Cnattingius S. Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards. BJOG 2001;108:830–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCowan LM, Harding JE, Stewart AW. Customized birthweight centiles predict SGA pregnancies with perinatal morbidity. BJOG 2005;112:1026–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueras F, Figueras J, Meier E, Eixarch E, Coll O, Gratacos E. Customised birthweight percentiles accurately predict perinatal morbidity. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007;92:277–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardosi J, Francis A. Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:28.e1–28.e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ego A, Subtil D, Grange G, Thiebaugeorges O, Senat MV, Vayssiere C, Zeitlin J. Customized versus population-based birth weight standards for identifying growth restricted infants: a French multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:1042–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongelli M, Gardosi J. Reduction of false-positive diagnosis of fetal growth restriction by application of customized fetal growth standards. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:844–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narchi H, Skinner A. Infants of diabetic mothers with abnormal fetal growth missed by standard growth charts. J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;29:609–613.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCowan L, Stewart AW, Francis A, Gardosi J. A customised birthweight centile calculator developed for a New Zealand population. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;44:428–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongelli M, Figueras F, Francis A, Gardosi J. A customized birthweight centile calculator developed for an Australian population. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2007;47:128–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardosi J, Francis A. A customised standard to assess fetal growth in a US population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:e1–25.e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar