Predictors of successful external cephalic version and assessment of success for vaginal delivery

References

• Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000;356;1375–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collea JV, Chein C, Quilligan EJ. The randomized management of term frank breech presentation: a study of 208 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;137:235–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimovsky ML, Wallace RL, Schifrin BS, Paul RH. Randomized management of the nonfrank breech presentation at term: a preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;146:34–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah ME. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(3):CD000166
   Google Scholar
• Su M, McLeod L, Ross S, et al. Term breech trial collaborative group: factors associated with adverse perinatal outcome in the Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:740–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340. Mode of term singleton breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:235–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rietberg CC, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Visser GH. The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants. BJOG 2005;112:205–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartnack Tharin JE, Rasmussen S, Krebs L. Consequences of the Term Breech Trial in Denmark. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90:767–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control. Births: Final data for 2001. National vital statistics reports 2002;51:77
   Google Scholar
• Hutton EK, Hannah ME, Barrett J. Use of external cephalic version for breech pregnancy and mode of delivery for breech and twin pregnancy: a survey of Canadian practitioners. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2002;24:804–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yogev Y, Horowitz E, Ben-Haroush A, et al. Changing attitudes toward mode of delivery and external cephalic version in breech presentations. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002;79:221–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. External cephalic version. ACOG Practice Bulletin 13. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Chan LY, Leung TY, Fok WY, et al. High incidence of obstetric interventions after successful external cephalic version. BJOG 2002;109:627–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Haroush A, Perri T, Bar J, et al. Mode of delivery following successful external cephalic version. Am J Perinatol 2002;19:355–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan LY, Tang JL, Tsoi KF, et al. Intrapartum cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:155–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau TK, Lo KW, Rogers M. Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:218–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vézina Y, Bujold E, Varin J, et al. Cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version of breech presentation at term: a comparative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:763–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clock C, Kurtzman J, White J, Chung JH. Cesarean risk after successful external cephalic version: a matched, retrospective analysis. J Perinatol 2009;29:96–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;10:CD000083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocks V, Philipsen T, Secher NJ. A randomized trial of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984;91:653–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kasule J, Chimbira TH, Brown IM. Controlled trial of external cephalic version. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:14–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ, Sadan O, Myer IG, et al. External cephalic version and spontaneous version rates: ethnic and other determinants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986;93:13–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robertson AW, Kopelman JN, Read JA, et al. External cephalic version at term: is a tocolytic necessary? Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:896–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahomed K, Seeras R, Coulson R. External cephalic version at term. A randomized controlled trial using tocolysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98:8–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goh JT, Johnson CM, Gregora MG. External cephalic version at term. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;33:364–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook HA. Experience with external cephalic version and selective vaginal breech delivery in private practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:1886–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauldin JG, Mauldin PD, Feng TI, et al. Determining the clinical efficacy and cost savings of successful external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1639–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau TK, Lo KW, Wan D, Rogers MS. Predictors of successful external cephalic version at term: a prospective study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:798–802
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams J, Bjornsson S, Cameron AD, et al. Prospective study of external cephalic version in Glasgow: patient selection, outcome and factors associated with outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;19:598–601
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guyer CH, Heard MJ. A prospective audit of external cephalic version at term: are ultrasound parameters predictive of outcome? J Obstet Gynaecol 2001;21:580–2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skupski DW, Harrison-Restelli C, Dupont RB. External cephalic version: an approach with few complications. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2003;56:83–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, et al. Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:76–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinovici J, Barkai G, Shalev J, et al. Impact of a protocol for external cephalic version under tocolysis at term. Isr J Med Sci 1986;22:34–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ben-Meir A, Erez Y, Sela HY, et al. Prognostic parameters for successful external cephalic version. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;21:660–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkinen P, Ylöstalo P. Ultrasonic examination before external version of breech presentation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1982;13:90–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fortunato SJ, Mercer LJ, Guzick DS. External cephalic version with tocolysis: factors associated with success. Obstet Gynecol 1988;72:59–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald WL, Barton JJ. Ultrasonography and external cephalic version at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:1542–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westgren LM, Ingemarsson I. Breech delivery and mental handicap. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1988;2:187–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielian P, Wang J, Hall M. Long-term outcome by method of delivery of fetuses in breech presentation at term: population based follow up. BMJ 1996;312:1451–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen H, Steffensen F, Olsen J, et al. Long-term follow-up of cognitive outcome after breech presentation at birth. Epidemiology 1999;10:554–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suzuki S, Yamamuro T. Fetal movement and fetal presentation. Early Hum Dev 1985;11:255–63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kean LH, Suwanrath C, Gargari SS, et al. A comparison of fetal behaviour in breech and cephalic presentations at term. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106:1209–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Dalaker K, Irgens L. Reproductive career after breech presentation: subsequent pregnancy rates, interpregnancy interval, and recurrence. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:345–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabiri D, Elram T, Aboo-dia M, et al. Timing of delivery after external cephalic version and the risk for cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:209–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar