New technique for assessing fetal heart growth using three-dimensional ultrasonography: description of the technique and reference curves

References

• Moore KL, Persaud TV, Torchia MG. Before we are born: essentials of embryology and birth defects. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Pastore AR, Cerri GG. Ultrassonografia em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2nd ed. São Paulo: Revinter; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Williams RL, Creasy RK, Cunningham GC, et al. Fetal growth and perinatal viability in California. Obstet Gynecol 1982;59:624–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. Cardiac screening examination of the fetus: guidelines for performing the ‘basic’ and ‘extended basic’ cardiac scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:107–13
   Google Scholar
• Lee W, Allan L, Carvalho JS, et al. ISUOG consensus statement: what constitutes a fetal echocardiogram? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:239–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang FM, Hsu KF, Ko HC, et al. Fetal heart volume assessment by three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:42–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peralta CF, Cavoretto P, Csapo B, et al. Lung and heart volumes by three-dimensional ultrasound in normal fetuses at 12--32 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:128–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimarães Filho HA, da Costa LL, Araujo Júnior E, et al. XI VOCAL (eXtended Imaging VOCAL): a new modality for three-dimensional sonographic volume measurement. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007;276:95–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barreto EQ, Milani HJ, Haratz KK, et al. Reference intervals for fetal heart volume from 3-dimensional sonography using the extended imaging virtual organ computer-aided analysis method at gestational ages of 20 to 34 weeks. J Ultrasound Med 2012;31:673–8
   Google Scholar
• Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, et al. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements – a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:333–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman DG, Chitty LS. Charts of fetal size I: methodology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;101:29–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee W, Riggs T, Amula V, et al. Fetal echocardiography: z-score reference ranges for a large patient population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35:28–34
   Google Scholar
• Simioni C, Nardozza LM, Araujo Júnior E, et al. Heart stroke volume, cardiac output, and ejection fraction in 265 normal fetus in the second half of gestation assessed by 4D ultrasound using spatio-temporal image correlation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011;24:1159–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamill N, Yeo L, Romero R, et al. Fetal cardiac ventricular volume, cardiac output, and ejection fraction determined with 4-dimensional ultrasound using spatiotemporal image correlation and virtual organ computer-aided analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:76.e1–10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreto EQ, Milani HF, Araujo Júnior E, et al. Reproducibility of fetal heart volume by 3D-sonography using the XI VOCAL method. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2010;8:17
   Google Scholar
• Barreto EQ, Milani HJ, Araujo Júnior E, et al. Reliability and validity of in vitro volume calculations by 3-dimensional ultrasonography using the multiplanar, virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL), and extended imaging VOCAL methods. J Ultrasound Med 2010;29:767–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeggi ET, Fouron JC, Proulx F. Fetal cardiac performance in uncomplicated and well-controlled maternal type I diabetes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17:311–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampl M, Kuzawa CW, Jeanty P. Growth patterns of the heart and kidney suggest inter-organ collaboration in facultative fetal growth. Am J Hum Biol 2005;17:178–194
   Google Scholar
• Paladini D, Chita SK, Allan D. Prenatal measurement of cardiothoracic ratio in evaluation of heart disease. Arch Dis Child 1990;65:20–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guariglia L, Rosati P, Bartolozzi F. Cardiac circumference measurement: possible screening tool in early pregnancy for anomalous cardiac development. Fetal Diagn Ther 2006;21:134–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Espinoza J, Gotsch F, Kusanovic JP, et al. Changes in fetal cardiac geometry with gestation: implications for 3- and 4-dimensional fetal echocardiography. J Ultrasound Med 2007;26:437–43
   Google Scholar
• Awadh AM, Prefumo F, Bland JM, Carvalho JS. Assessment of the intraobserver variability in the measurement of fetal cardiothoracic ratio using ellipse and diameter methods. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28:53–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Messing B, Cohen SM, Valsky DV, et al. Fetal cardiac ventricle volumetry in the second half of gestation assessed by 4D ultrasound using STIC combined with inversion mode. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:142–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutschek B, Sahn DJ. Semi-automatic segmentation of fetal cardiac cavities: progress towards an automated fetal echocardiogram. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:176--80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo G, Capponi A, Pietrolucci ME, Arduini D. Role of sonographic automatic volume calculation in measuring fetal cardiac ventricular volumes using 4-dimensional sonography: comparison with virtual organ computer-aided analysis. J Ultrasound Med 2010;29:261–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar