The outcome of midwife-led labor in low-risk women within an obstetric referral unit

References

• Wei S, Wo BL, Qi H-P, et al. Early amniotomy and early oxytocin for prevention of, or therapy for, delay in first stage spontaneous labor compared with routine care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;4:1–63
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Branch DW, Ramirez MM, et al. Oxytocin regimen for labor augmentation, labor progression, and perinatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:249–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown HC, Paranjothy S, Dowswell T, Thomas J. Package of care for active management in labor for reducing caesarean section rates in low-risk women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;4:1–45
   Google Scholar
• Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, et al. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;8:1–107
   Google Scholar
• Begley C, Devane D, Clarke M, et al. Comparison of midwife-led and consultant-led care of healthy women at low risk of childbirth complications in the Republic of Ireland: a randomised trial. BMC Preg Childbirth 2011;11:85–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy SK, Hartz DL, Tracy MB, et al. Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care forwomen of any risk: M@NGO, a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2013;382:1723–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan HL, Forster DA, Davey MA, et al. Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2012;119:1483–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers ACC, Brouwers HAA, Hukkelhoven CWPM, et al. Perinatal mortality and severe morbidity in low and high risk term pregnancies in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2010;341:c5639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wax JR, Lucas FL, Lamont M, et al. Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs planned hospital births: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 2010;203:243.e1–e8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birthplace in England Collaborative Group. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ 2011;343:d7400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, Brent RL, et al. Clinical opinion. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 2013;208:31–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman JE. Primigravid labor: a graphicostastistical analysis. Obstetr Gynecol 1955;6:567–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Incerti M, Locatelli A, Ghidini A. Variability in rate of cervical dilation in nulliparous women at term. Birth 2011;38:30–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 2014;123:693–711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Driscoll K, Jackson RJ, Gallagher JT. Prevention of prolonged labour. BMJ 1969;2:477–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark SL, Simpson KR, Knox GE, Garite TJ. Oxytocin: new perspectives on an old drug. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 2009;200:35.e1–e6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johanson R, Newburn M, Macfarlane A. Has the medicalisation of childbirth gone too far? BMJ 2002;324:892–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis D, Baddock S, Pairman S, et al. Planned place of birth in New Zealand: does it affect mode of birth and intervention rates among low-risk women? Birth 2011;38:111–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee A. Intrapartum fetal rate heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:192–202
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amelink-Verburg MP, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Hakkenberg R, et al. Evaluation of 280 000 cases in Dutch midwifery practices: a descriptive study. BJOG 2007;115:570–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan DJ, Robson MS, Murphy M, O'Herlihy C. Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 2010;201:308.e1–e8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker KF, Cohen AL, Walker SH, et al. The dangers of the day of birth. BJOG 2014;121:714–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasi I, D'amico R, Fenu V, et al. Sonographic assessment of fetal spine and head position during the first and second stages of labor for the diagnosis of persistent occiput posterior position: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;35:210–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anim-Somuah M, Smyth R, Jomes L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour (Review). Cochrane Library 2011;12:1–124
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman E, Davidson K, Lee-Parritz A, Shearer E. Changes in fetal position during labor and their association with epidural analgesia. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:974–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biro MA, Waldenström U, Pannifex JH. Team midwifery care in a tertiary level obstetric service: a randomized controlled trial. Birth 2000;27:168–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oscarsson ME, Amer-Wåhlin I, Rydhstroem H, Källén K. Outcome in obstetric care related to oxytocin use. A population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:1094–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt J, Vold IN, Backe B, et al. Child births in a modified midwife managed unit: selection and transfer according to intended place of delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001;80:206–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaunitz AM, Spence C, Danielson TS, et al. Perinatal and maternal mortality in a religious group avoiding obstetric care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;150:826–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodnett ED, Downe S, Walsh D, Weston J. Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;9:1–53
   Google Scholar